| Literature DB >> 25386562 |
Ze-Lin Sun1, Qi-Ying Xie1, Gong-Liang Guo2, Ke Ma3, Yuan-Yuan Huang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetuin-A (FA) suppresses arterial calcification, promotes insulin resistance, and appears to be elevated in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), but the data is still inconsistent. To clarify the correlation between serum FA levels and the presence and severity of CVDs, we performed this meta-analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25386562 PMCID: PMC4216691 DOI: 10.1155/2014/691540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Characteristics of included studies focused on serum levels of FA.
| First author | Year | Ethnicity | Sample size | Gender (M/F) | Age (years) | Disease | Method | Main finding | Mean value (ug/mL) | NOS score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | Case | Control | Case | Control | (Case versus control) | |||||||
| Kadoglou [ | 2014 | Caucasians | 95 | 35 | 68/27 | 28/7 | 67.1 ± 6.5 | 65.0 ± 9.5 | CAD | ELISA | ① | 222.00 versus 839 | 7 |
| Zhao [ | 2013 | Asians | 129 | 69 | 67/62 | 35/34 | 63.1 ± 8.9 | 62.9 ± 9.0 | CAD with T2DM | ELISA | ② | 451.14 versus 396.41 | 7 |
| 129 | 69 | 67/62 | 35/34 | 63.1 ± 8.9 | 62.9 ± 9.0 | CAD with T2DM | ELISA | 451.14 versus 308.3 | |||||
| Ballestri [ | 2013 | Caucasians | 46 | 24 | 35/11 | 13/11 | 67.6 ± 11.4 | 68.9 ± 13.6 | CAD | ELISA | ③ | 374 versus 445.8 | 6 |
| Voros [ | 2012 | Caucasians | 171 | 81 | 120/51 | 46/35 | 62.0 ± 6.0 | 60.0 ± 7.0 | MI | RIA | ④ | 673 versus 673 | 8 |
| Afsar [ | 2012 | Asians | 95 | 81 | 68/27 | 32/49 | 61.8 ± 12.1 | 48.3 ± 9.2 | ACS | ELISA | ⑤ | 760 versus 1100 | 7 |
| Basar [ | 2011 | Asians | 180 | 55 | 152/28 | 46/9 | 57.9 ± 9.4 | 56.7 ± 8.2 | STEMI | ELISA | ⑥ | 286.85 versus 359.8 | 8 |
| Bilgir [ | 2010 | Asians | 34 | 42 | — | — | 60.3 ± 11.8 | 59.6 ± 11.9 | MI | ELISA | ⑦ | 156 versus 179 | 5 |
| 59.4 ± 8.8 | 59.6 ± 11.9 | SA | ELISA | 167 versus 179 | |||||||||
| Weikert [ | 2008 | Caucasians | 227 | 2198 | 164/63 | 798/1400 | 57.5 ± 0.6 | 49.5 ± 0.2 | MI | ELISA | ⑧ | 253.6 versus 226.9 | 8 |
| Lim [ | 2007 | Caucasians | 284 | 34 | 233/51 | 20/14 | 60.0 ± 14.0 | 67.0 ± 14.0 | STEMI | ELISA | ⑨ | 188 versus 219 | 8 |
| Mathews [ | 2002 | Caucasians | 20 | 44 | 14/6 | 23/21 | 55 (43~69) | 48 (38~62) | AMI | ELISA | ⑩ | 281.3 versus 312.3 | 6 |
FA: fetuin-A; M: male; F: female; CAD: coronary artery disease; MI: myocardial infarction; ACS: acute coronary syndrome; STEMI: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; SA: stable angina; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; ①: derangements in serum levels of all vascular calcification inhibitors compared with those in healthy controls. Simvastatin treatment for 6 months significantly decreased serum fetuin-A, OPG, and OPN levels; ②: serum fetuin-A levels are independently correlated with the presence and severity of CAD in T2DM patients; ③: high fetuin-A levels are independently associated with NAFLD and a lower risk of chronographically diagnosed CAD; ④: ghrelin level is determined by elevated insulin and decreased adiponectin levels; ⑤: fetuin-A levels decrease in patients with acute coronary syndromes, independent of heart valve calcification; ⑥: low-admission fetuin-A levels are associated with impaired coronary flow in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention; ⑦: fetuin-A levels seem to be decreased in SA and MI patients; ⑧: high plasma fetuin-A levels are correlated with an increased risk of MI and IS; ⑨: fetuin-A is an important predictor of death at 6 months in STEMI patients independent of NT-proBNP, CRP, and CADILLAC risk score; ⑩: Plasmaa2-HSG concentrations start to decrease within a few hours after the onset of AMI and return to near normal concentrations during the recovery period (5–7 days after AMI).
Figure 1Flow chart shows study selection procedure. Thirteen case-control studies were included in this meta-analysis.
Figure 2The distribution of the amount of articles in electronic databases over the last decade.
Figure 3Forest plots on the difference of serum fetuin-A levels between cardiovascular disease patients and healthy subjects.
Figure 4Subgroup analyses on the difference of serum fetuin-A levels between cardiovascular disease patients and healthy subjects.
Figure 5Sensitivity analysis of the summary odds ratio coefficients on the difference of serum fetuin-A levels between cardiovascular disease patients and healthy subjects.
Figure 6Funnel plot of publication biases on the difference of serum fetuin-A levels between cardiovascular disease patients and healthy subjects.