| Literature DB >> 25386393 |
Maryam Rezazad1, Farah Farokhi1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Present study investigated the effects of parsley extract on pregnant rat kidneys which have undergone clinical abortion using prostaglandins. The renal protective effect of parsley extract was evaluated in pregnant rats which had an abortion. Parsley was used due to its antioxidant properties.Entities:
Keywords: Abortion; Dysfunction; Kidney; Petroselinumcrispum
Year: 2014 PMID: 25386393 PMCID: PMC4224708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Effects of Petroselinum crispum seed ethanolic extract on body weights of normal and treated rats
| Group Treatment (n=6) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 150.24±0.08 | 166.11±5.10 | +15.87±5.09 |
| 1st DOP+Parsley | 169.30±3.02 | 163.36±5.29 | -5.93±2.27 |
| 2d DOP +Parsley | 166.26±6.71 | 164.21±6.18 | -2.05±1.96 |
| 3rd DOP +Parsley | 159.42±6.63 | 156.52±5.90 | -2.89±1.39 |
| Pregnant +Parsley | 172.91±6.40 | 143.70±5.73 | -29.21±2.43 |
| Non-pregnant +Parsley | 163.76±3.34 | 158.33±3.17 | -5.43±1.60 |
| Prostadin +pregnant | 173.90±4.19 | 167.03±4.15 | -6.86±0.51 |
| Prostadin +non-pregnant | 177.43±2.70 | 169.46±4.58 | -7.96±1.89 |
| Prostadin +parsley +pregnant | 178.73±2.55 | 155.93±6.71 | -22.80±8.95 |
p<0.05. Values are mean±SEM, n=6, when compared with control using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
Effects of Petroselinum crispum seed ethanolic extract on serum parameters of normal and treated rats
| Group Treatment (n=6) | Creatinine (mg/dl) | Urea (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.12±0.005 | 7.82±0.01 |
| 1st DOP +Parsley | 2.32±0.008 | 7.21±0.01 |
| 2d DOP +Parsley | 1.63±0.008 | 7.32±0.01 |
| 3rd DOP +Parsley | 1.83±0.01 | 7.21±0.00 |
| Pregnant +Parsley | 2.41±0.005 | 7.40±0.005 |
| Non-pregnant +Parsley | 1.94±2.43 | 8.32±0.01 |
| Prostadin +pregnant | 2.51±0.008 | 7.34±0.008 |
| Prostadin +non-pregnant | 2.25±0.01 | 7.94±0.005 |
| Prostadin +parsley +pregnant | 2.41±0.01 | 7.40±0.008 |
p<0.05+increase,
p<0.05+decrease. Values are mean±SEM, n=6, when compared with control using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
Figure 1Histopathological evaluation of kidney sections. ×400 magnifition, (A) shows control group, (B) DOP1, (C) DOP2, (D) DOP3, (E) pregnant parsley treatment, (F) parsley non-pregnant treatment, (G) prostadin-treated pregnant group, (H) prostadin-treated non-pregnant group, and (J) mixed treatment group.
Figure 2The accumulation of lymphocytes in mixed-treatment group (×400).
Effects of Petroselinum crispum seed ethanolic extract on MDA and TAS of treated rats
| Group Treatment (n=6) | MDA (µmol/L) | TAS (µmol/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.39±0.31 | 1.25±0.22 |
| 1st DOP +Parsley | 2.24±0.005 | 1.23±0.005 |
| 2d DOP +Parsley | 2.23±0.008 | 0.95±0.005 |
| 3rd DOP +Parsley | 2.20±0.008 | 0.92±0.008 |
| Pregnant +Parsley | 3.57±0.008 | 0.84±0.008 |
p<0.05+increase,
p<0.05+decrease. Values are mean±SEM, n=6, when compared with control using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.
Effects of Petroselinum crispum seed ethanolic extract on bowman and glomerular diameter and urinary space of normal and treated rats
| Group treatment (n=6) |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 395±32.84 | 343±37.00 | 52±10.05 | 533.33±51.63 |
| 1st DOP +Parsley | 351±43.39 | 298±40.47 | 53±11.28 | 666.66±51.63 |
| 2d DOP +Parsley | 428±53.86 | 364±51.33 | 64±6.80 | 533.33±51.63 |
| 3rd DOP +Parsley | 467±36.72 | 396±34.70 | 71±12.52 | 600±89.44 |
| Pregnant +Parsley | 377±41.05 | 329±45.98 | 48±17.04 | 733.33±51.63 |
| Non-pregnant +Parsley | 432±40.73 | 371±46.89 | 61±16.18 | 633.33±51.63 |
| Prostadin +pregnant | 395±49.04 | 345±41.61 | 50±13.76 | 333.33±51.63 |
| Prostadin +non-pregnant | 413±29.75 | 364±29.80 | 49±8.52 | 366.66±51.63 |
| Prostadin +parsley +pregnant | 434±43.33 | 384±43.09 | 50±9.17 | 500±89.44 |
p<0.05. Values are mean±SEM, n=6, when compared with control using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test.