Literature DB >> 25385199

The Management of Long-Term Sickness Absence in Large Public Sector Healthcare Organisations: A Realist Evaluation Using Mixed Methods.

Angela Higgins1, Peter O'Halloran, Sam Porter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The success of measures to reduce long-term sickness absence (LTSA) in public sector organisations is contingent on organisational context. This realist evaluation investigates how interventions interact with context to influence successful management of LTSA.
METHODS: Multi-method case study in three Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland comprising realist literature review, semi-structured interviews (61 participants), Process-Mapping and feedback meetings (59 participants), observation of training, analysis of documents.
RESULTS: Important activities included early intervention; workplace-based occupational rehabilitation; robust sickness absence policies with clear trigger points for action. Used appropriately, in a context of good interpersonal and interdepartmental communication and shared goals, these are able to increase the motivation of staff to return to work. Line managers are encouraged to take a proactive approach when senior managers provide support and accountability. Hindering factors: delayed intervention; inconsistent implementation of policy and procedure; lack of resources; organisational complexity; stakeholders misunderstanding each other's goals and motives.
CONCLUSIONS: Different mechanisms have the potential to encourage common motivations for earlier return from LTSA, such as employees feeling that they have the support of their line manager to return to work and having the confidence to do so. Line managers' proactively engage when they have confidence in the support of seniors and in their own ability to address LTSA. Fostering these motivations calls for a thoughtful, diagnostic process, taking into account the contextual factors (and whether they can be modified) and considering how a given intervention can be used to trigger the appropriate mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25385199     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9553-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  21 in total

1.  Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed.

Authors:  Cecilia Nordqvist; Christina Holmqvist; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

Review 2.  Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers--current models and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Glenn Pransky; William Shaw; Renee-Louise Franche; Andrew Clarke
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 3.  The use and limitation of realistic evaluation as a tool for evidence-based practice: a critical realist perspective.

Authors:  Sam Porter; Peter O'Halloran
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 2.393

Review 4.  Management of long term sickness absence: a systematic realist review.

Authors:  Angela Higgins; Peter O'Halloran; Sam Porter
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  Protocolized versus non-protocolized weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  Bronagh Blackwood; Fiona Alderdice; Karen Ea Burns; Chris R Cardwell; Gavin Lavery; Peter O'Halloran
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

6.  Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Julie Gervais; Marlène Falardeau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

7.  Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making.

Authors:  Trevor A Sheldon
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-07

Review 8.  Assembling the evidence jigsaw: insights from a systematic review of UK studies of individual-focused return to work initiatives for disabled and long-term ill people.

Authors:  Stephen Clayton; Clare Bambra; Rachael Gosling; Sue Povall; Kate Misso; Margaret Whitehead
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care.

Authors:  Jo Rycroft-Malone; Marina Fontenla; Debra Bick; Kate Seers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

Authors:  J Frank; S Sinclair; S Hogg-Johnson; H Shannon; C Bombardier; D Beaton; D Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Rogers; A De Brún; E McAuliffe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Advance Care Planning With Patients Who Have End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Realist Review.

Authors:  Peter O'Halloran; Helen Noble; Kelly Norwood; Peter Maxwell; Joanne Shields; Damian Fogarty; Fliss Murtagh; Rachael Morton; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  The usefulness and acceptability of a personal health record to children and young people living with a complex health condition: A realist review of the literature.

Authors:  Janet Diffin; Bronagh Byrne; Helen Kerr; Jayne Price; Aine Abbott; Dorry McLaughlin; Peter O'Halloran
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.508

4.  "Transition from children's to adult services for adolescents/young adults with life-limiting conditions: developing realist programme theory through an international comparison".

Authors:  Helen Kerr; Kimberley Widger; Geraldine Cullen-Dean; Jayne Price; Peter O'Halloran
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.