Literature DB >> 25384550

Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later.

David Lubinski1, Camilla P Benbow2, Harrison J Kell2.   

Abstract

Two cohorts of intellectually talented 13-year-olds were identified in the 1970s (1972-1974 and 1976-1978) as being in the top 1% of mathematical reasoning ability (1,037 males, 613 females). About four decades later, data on their careers, accomplishments, psychological well-being, families, and life preferences and priorities were collected. Their accomplishments far exceeded base-rate expectations: Across the two cohorts, 4.1% had earned tenure at a major research university, 2.3% were top executives at "name brand" or Fortune 500 companies, and 2.4% were attorneys at major firms or organizations; participants had published 85 books and 7,572 refereed articles, secured 681 patents, and amassed $358 million in grants. For both males and females, mathematical precocity early in life predicts later creative contributions and leadership in critical occupational roles. On average, males had incomes much greater than their spouses', whereas females had incomes slightly lower than their spouses'. Salient sex differences that paralleled the differential career outcomes of the male and female participants were found in lifestyle preferences and priorities and in time allocation.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  creativity; giftedness; individual differences; intelligence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25384550     DOI: 10.1177/0956797614551371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  12 in total

1.  How to raise a genius: lessons from a 45-year study of super-smart children.

Authors:  Tom Clynes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.

Authors:  Francesca Gino; Caroline Ashley Wilmuth; Alison Wood Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.

Authors:  Kira O McCabe; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2019-03-14

4.  Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Brian O Bernstein; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2020-07-02

5.  Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests.

Authors:  David Lubinski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Can lifestyle preferences help explain the persistent gender gap in academia? The "mothers work less" hypothesis supported for German but not for U.S. early career researchers.

Authors:  Monika Sieverding; Constanze Eib; Andreas B Neubauer; Thomas Stahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hypertension Development by Midlife and the Roles of Premorbid Cognitive Function, Sex, and Their Interaction.

Authors:  Drew M Altschul; Christina Wraw; Geoff Der; Catharine R Gale; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  A genome-wide analysis of putative functional and exonic variation associated with extremely high intelligence.

Authors:  S L Spain; I Pedroso; N Kadeva; M B Miller; W G Iacono; M McGue; E Stergiakouli; G Davey Smith; M Putallaz; D Lubinski; E L Meaburn; R Plomin; M A Simpson
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers?

Authors:  Sebastian Bergold; Linda Wirthwein; Detlef H Rost; Ricarda Steinmayr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-20

10.  A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality.

Authors:  Gijsbert Stoet; David C Geary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.