BACKGROUND: Xenotransplantation of porcine islets can reverse diabetes in non-human primates. The remaining hurdles for clinical application include safe and effective T-cell-directed immunosuppression, but protection against the innate immune system and coagulation dysfunction may be more difficult to achieve. Islet-targeted genetic manipulation of islet-source pigs represents a powerful tool to protect against graft loss. However, whether these genetic alterations would impair islet function is unknown. METHODS: On a background of α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO)/human (h)CD46, additional genes (hCD39, human tissue factor pathway inhibitor, porcine CTLA4-Ig) were inserted in different combinations under an insulin promoter to promote expression in islets (confirmed by immunofluorescence). Seven pigs were tested for baseline and glucose/arginine-challenged levels of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon. RESULTS: This preliminary study did not show definite evidence of β-cell deficiencies, even when three transgenes were expressed under the insulin promoter. Of seven animals, all were normoglycemic at fasting, and five of seven had normal glucose disposal rates after challenge. All animals exhibited insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon responses to both glucose and arginine challenge; however, significant interindividual variation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple islet-targeted transgenic expression was not associated with an overtly detrimental effect on islet function, suggesting that complex genetic constructs designed for islet protection warrants further testing in islet xenotransplantation models.
BACKGROUND: Xenotransplantation of porcine islets can reverse diabetes in non-human primates. The remaining hurdles for clinical application include safe and effective T-cell-directed immunosuppression, but protection against the innate immune system and coagulation dysfunction may be more difficult to achieve. Islet-targeted genetic manipulation of islet-source pigs represents a powerful tool to protect against graft loss. However, whether these genetic alterations would impair islet function is unknown. METHODS: On a background of α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO)/human (h)CD46, additional genes (hCD39, humantissue factor pathway inhibitor, porcineCTLA4-Ig) were inserted in different combinations under an insulin promoter to promote expression in islets (confirmed by immunofluorescence). Seven pigs were tested for baseline and glucose/arginine-challenged levels of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon. RESULTS: This preliminary study did not show definite evidence of β-cell deficiencies, even when three transgenes were expressed under the insulin promoter. Of seven animals, all were normoglycemic at fasting, and five of seven had normal glucose disposal rates after challenge. All animals exhibited insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon responses to both glucose and arginine challenge; however, significant interindividual variation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple islet-targeted transgenic expression was not associated with an overtly detrimental effect on islet function, suggesting that complex genetic constructs designed for islet protection warrants further testing in islet xenotransplantation models.
Authors: Anna Casu; Gabriel J Echeverri; Rita Bottino; Dirk J van der Windt; Jing He; Burcin Ekser; Suyapa Ball; David Ayares; David K C Cooper Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Tadatsura Koshika; Carol Phelps; Jason Fang; Seung Eun Lee; Minoru Fujita; David Ayares; David K C Cooper; Hidetaka Hara Journal: Immunology Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 7.397
Authors: Karen M Dwyer; Simon C Robson; Harshal H Nandurkar; Duncan J Campbell; Hilton Gock; Lisa J Murray-Segal; Nella Fisicaro; Tharun B Mysore; Elzbieta Kaczmarek; Peter J Cowan; Anthony J F d'Apice Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Bruce E Loveland; Julie Milland; Peter Kyriakou; Bruce R Thorley; Dale Christiansen; Marc B Lanteri; Mark Regensburg; Maureen Duffield; Andrew J French; Lindsay Williams; Louise Baker; Malcolm R Brandon; Pei-Xiang Xing; Del Kahn; Ian F C McKenzie Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: K Riesbeck; A Dorling; G Kemball-Cook; J H McVey; M Jones; E G Tuddenham; R I Lechler Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: W L Fodor; B L Williams; L A Matis; J A Madri; S A Rollins; J W Knight; W Velander; S P Squinto Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-11-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David K C Cooper; Shinichi Matsumoto; Adrian Abalovich; Takeshi Itoh; Nizar I Mourad; Pierre R Gianello; Eckhard Wolf; Emanuele Cozzi Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: H Iwase; B Ekser; V Satyananda; H Zhou; H Hara; P Bajona; M Wijkstrom; J K Bhama; C Long; M Veroux; Y Wang; Y Dai; C Phelps; D Ayares; M B Ezzelarab; D K C Cooper Journal: Transpl Immunol Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 1.708
Authors: R Bottino; M Wijkstrom; D J van der Windt; H Hara; M Ezzelarab; N Murase; S Bertera; J He; C Phelps; D Ayares; D K C Cooper; M Trucco Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 8.086