Literature DB >> 26365762

The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research.

David K C Cooper1, Burcin Ekser2, Jagdeece Ramsoondar3, Carol Phelps3, David Ayares3.   

Abstract

There is a critical shortage in the number of deceased human organs that become available for the purposes of clinical transplantation. This problem might be resolved by the transplantation of organs from pigs genetically engineered to protect them from the human immune response. The pathobiological barriers to successful pig organ transplantation in primates include activation of the innate and adaptive immune systems, coagulation dysregulation and inflammation. Genetic engineering of the pig as an organ source has increased the survival of the transplanted pig heart, kidney, islet and corneal graft in non-human primates (NHPs) from minutes to months or occasionally years. Genetic engineering may also contribute to any physiological barriers that might be identified, as well as to reducing the risks of transfer of a potentially infectious micro-organism with the organ. There are now an estimated 40 or more genetic alterations that have been carried out in pigs, with some pigs expressing five or six manipulations. With the new technology now available, it will become increasingly common for a pig to express even more genetic manipulations, and these could be tested in the pig-to-NHP models to assess their efficacy and benefit. It is therefore likely that clinical trials of pig kidney, heart and islet transplantation will become feasible in the near future.
Copyright © 2015 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetically-engineered; islets; non-human primate; organs; pig; xenotransplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26365762      PMCID: PMC4689670          DOI: 10.1002/path.4635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  126 in total

1.  From ABO-incompatible human kidney transplantation to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Guy P J Alexandre
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.907

2.  Characterization of baboon NK cells and their xenogeneic activity.

Authors:  Sarah B Kennett; Cynthia M Porter; Judith A Horvath-Arcidiacono; Eda T Bloom
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes.

Authors:  Jose L Estrada; Greg Martens; Ping Li; Andrew Adams; Kenneth A Newell; Mandy L Ford; James R Butler; Richard Sidner; Matt Tector; Joseph Tector
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Reduced binding of human antibodies to cells from GGTA1/CMAH KO pigs.

Authors:  C Burlak; L L Paris; A J Lutz; R A Sidner; J Estrada; P Li; M Tector; A J Tector
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 5.  Controlling coagulation dysregulation in xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Peter J Cowan; Simon C Robson; Anthony J F d'Apice
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.640

6.  Human natural killer lymphocytes directly recognize evolutionarily conserved oligosaccharide ligands expressed by xenogeneic tissues.

Authors:  L Inverardi; B Clissi; A L Stolzer; J R Bender; M S Sandrin; R Pardi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Genetically-modified pig mesenchymal stromal cells: xenoantigenicity and effect on human T-cell xenoresponses.

Authors:  Mohamed Ezzelarab; Corin Ezzelarab; Tyler Wilhite; Goutham Kumar; Hidetaka Hara; David Ayares; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.907

8.  Specific intravenous carbohydrate therapy. A new concept in inhibiting antibody-mediated rejection--experience with ABO-incompatible cardiac allografting in the baboon.

Authors:  D K Cooper; Y Ye; M Niekrasz; M Kehoe; M Martin; F A Neethling; S Kosanke; L E DeBault; G Worsley; N Zuhdi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Alloantibody and xenoantibody cross-reactivity in transplantation.

Authors:  D K C Cooper; Y-L Tseng; S L Saidman
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Lack of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose expression on porcine endothelial cells prevents complement-induced lysis but not direct xenogeneic NK cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Bettina C Baumann; Pietro Forte; Robert J Hawley; Robert Rieben; Mårten K J Schneider; Jörg D Seebach
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing revolutionize the creation of genetically modified pigs for modeling human diseases.

Authors:  Jing Yao; Jiaojiao Huang; Jianguo Zhao
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  An Investigation of Extracellular Histones in Pig-To-Baboon Organ Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Tao Li; Whayoung Lee; Hidetaka Hara; Cassandra Long; Mohamed Ezzelarab; David Ayares; Hai Huang; Yi Wang; Charles T Esmon; David K C Cooper; Hayato Iwase
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Pig-to-Primate Islet Xenotransplantation: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Zhengzhao Liu; Wenbao Hu; Tian He; Yifan Dai; Hidetaka Hara; Rita Bottino; David K C Cooper; Zhiming Cai; Lisha Mou
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Corneal blindness and current major treatment concern-graft scarcity.

Authors:  Kah Hie Wong; Ka Wai Kam; Li Jia Chen; Alvin L Young
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.

Authors:  Nienke de Graeff; Karin R Jongsma; Josephine Johnston; Sarah Hartley; Annelien L Bredenoord
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Srijan Tandukar; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 7.  A review of pig liver xenotransplantation: Current problems and recent progress.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxu Yang; Kaishan Tao; Quancheng Wang; Bin Dai; Shibin Qu; Wei Peng; Hong Zhang; David K C Cooper; Kefeng Dou
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.907

8.  B cell phenotypes in baboons with pig artery patch grafts receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamamoto; Qi Li; Hidetaka Hara; Liaoran Wang; Hongmin Zhou; Juan Li; Devin E Eckhoff; A Joseph Tector; Edwin C Klein; Ray Lovingood; Mohamed Ezzelarab; David Ayares; Yi Wang; David K C Cooper; Hayato Iwase
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.708

9.  Interleukin-8 mediates neutrophil-endothelial interactions in pig-to-human xenogeneic models.

Authors:  Beth M French; Selin Sendil; Krishna Mohan Sepuru; Jolene Ranek; Lars Burdorf; Donald Harris; Emily Redding; Xiangfei Cheng; Christopher T Laird; Yuming Zhao; Benjamin Cerel; Krishna Rajarathnam; Richard N Pierson; Agnes M Azimzadeh
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 10.  Xenotransplantation: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Ping Li; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.