Literature DB >> 10977561

Telementored laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study.

M A Sawyer1, R B Lim, S Y Wong, P T Cirangle, D Birkmire-Peters.   

Abstract

Few laparoscopic surgical experts exist relative to the number of surgeons needing training in laparoscopic surgical techniques. This study tested application of telemedicine technology in the mentoring of surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Our Surgical Telementoring Suite provided real-time audio and video telecommunication to the operating room. Data points for telementored laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC, n = 6) were compared to age and sex-matched controls having standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC, n = 6) with mentors physically present in the operating room. TLC data were also compared between cases performed with a staff surgeon and resident as mentorees (SRM, n = 3), versus two residents as mentorees (RRM, n = 3). Data were analyzed with chi-square testing. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. No major operative complications occurred in either group (p > 0.05). Total operative times were similar (92.2 +/- 18.4 minutes SLC vs. 94.7 +/- 25.3 minutes TLC, p > 0.05). Additional data compared between SRM and RRM groups included time to establishment of a pneumoperitoneum of 12-15 mm Hg (7.0 +/- 6.1 minutes SRM vs. 6.7 +/- 2.9 minutes RRM), time to placement of all four trocars (13.0 +/- 3.6 minutes SRM vs. 10.3 +/- 3.1 minutes RRM, time to isolation and proximal clipping of the cystic duct (38.0 +/- 12.1 minutes SRM vs. 55.7 +/- 29.0 minutes RRM), and time to removal of the gallbladder (77.3 +/- 25.4 minutes vs. 77.7 +/- 27.5 minutes RRM). For all data points, p > 0.05. We conclude that telementoring is a safe, effective method for teaching the techniques of LC. This is true for operating teams composed of surgical residents, with or without staff surgeons present.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10977561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  5 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of telementoring applications in laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Jan Franzen; Stefan Bollmann; Oliver O Koch; Rudolf Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Telementoring: an application whose time has come.

Authors:  James C Rosser; Steven M Young; Jonathan Klonsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Usability characteristics of self-administered computer-assisted interviewing in the emergency department: factors affecting ease of use, efficiency, and entry error.

Authors:  D B Herrick; A Nakhasi; B Nelson; S Rice; P A Abbott; A S Saber Tehrani; R E Rothman; H P Lehmann; D E Newman-Toker
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel H Shin; Leonard Dalag; Raed A Azhar; Michael Santomauro; Raj Satkunasivam; Charles Metcalfe; Matthew Dunn; Andre Berger; Hooman Djaladat; Mike Nguyen; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 5.  Overcoming the Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Mentorship: A Scoping Review of Long-distance Mentorship in Surgery.

Authors:  Layne N Raborn; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.891

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.