Literature DB >> 25379768

Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns: implications for prenatal care delivery.

Elizabeth E Krans1, Matthew M Davis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In February 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced a 4-year initiative to test new approaches to prenatal care delivery to improve rates of preterm birth for women enrolled in Medicaid. The Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns initiative was designed to achieve this goal through two strategies: first, a public awareness campaign designed to reduce the rate of elective deliveries prior to 39-week gestation, and second, a funding opportunity to test the effectiveness of enhanced prenatal care models designed to reduce the incidence of low-birth-weight infants among pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries. This article reviews previous prenatal care expansion efforts and provides insights into the alternative prenatal care delivery models currently being tested for low-income patient populations at high risk for adverse birth outcomes. RECENT
FINDINGS: Alternative prenatal care models, such as prenatal home visitation and group prenatal care for patients at high risk for adverse birth outcomes, may provide more efficient and effective care than the traditional, predominantly medical model of prenatal care delivery.
SUMMARY: The authors discuss the relationship between prenatal care utilization and adverse birth outcomes, such as low birth weight, and current efforts to reinvent prenatal care content, structure and delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25379768      PMCID: PMC4247992          DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  25 in total

1.  CenteringPregnancy: an innovative approach to prenatal care delivery.

Authors:  Diana Garretto; Peter S Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Preventing Low Birthweight: 25 years, prenatal risk, and the failure to reinvent prenatal care.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Preventing preterm birth and increasing access to prenatal care: two important but distinct national goals.

Authors:  G R Alexander; E Howell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Medicaid: entering the third decade.

Authors:  C N Oberg; C L Polich
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Elizabeth Reed; Urania Magriples; Claire Westdahl; Sharon Schindler Rising; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-02

6.  Births: final data for 2012.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Sally C Curtin; T J Matthews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2013-12-30

7.  Infant mortality and low birth weight among black and white infants--United States, 1980-2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  The effect of providing health coverage to poor uninsured pregnant women in Massachusetts.

Authors:  J S Haas; I S Udvarhelyi; C N Morris; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-01-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight.

Authors:  G R Alexander; C C Korenbrot
Journal:  Future Child       Date:  1995

10.  Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States.

Authors:  Rebecca B Russell; Nancy S Green; Claudia A Steiner; Susan Meikle; Jennifer L Howse; Karalee Poschman; Todd Dias; Lisa Potetz; Michael J Davidoff; Karla Damus; Joann R Petrini
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  9 in total

1.  Insurance Differences in Preventive Care Use and Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Pregnant Women in a Medicaid Nonexpansion State: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yhenneko J Taylor; Tsai-Ling Liu; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Meeting Women Where They Are: Integration of Care As the Foundation of Treatment for At-Risk Pregnant and Postpartum Women.

Authors:  Melanie Thomas; Margaret Hutchison; Gloria Castro; Melissa Nau; Martha Shumway; Naomi Stotland; Anna Spielvogel
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-03

3.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11

Review 4.  Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ebony B Carter; Lorene A Temming; Jennifer Akin; Susan Fowler; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Anatomy of Good Prenatal Care: Perspectives of Low Income African-American Women on Barriers and Facilitators to Prenatal Care.

Authors:  Mary C Mazul; Trina C Salm Ward; Emmanuel M Ngui
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-01-28

6.  Development of Financial Support Program for High Risk Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Ihnsook Jeong; Jiyun Kim; Sook Bin Im
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2016-02-17

7.  Group versus traditional prenatal care in low-risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  E B Carter; K Barbier; R Sarabia; G A Macones; A G Cahill; M G Tuuli
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Evaluating adherence to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines at the first obstetric visit.

Authors:  Diane Christopher; Amy Markese; Shawna Tonick; Lauren Carpenter; Margo S Harrison
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

9.  Social-ecological considerations for the sleep health of rural mothers.

Authors:  Alexandra R Fischer; Sha-Rhonda M Green; Heather E Gunn
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.