Literature DB >> 25377400

Patient and trauma center characteristics associated with helicopter emergency medical services transport for patients with minor injuries in the United States.

Brian H Cheung1, M Kit Delgado, Kristan L Staudenmayer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical services (EMS) transport is expensive, and previous work has shown that cost-effective use of this resource is dependent on the proportion of minor injuries flown. To understand how overtriage to helicopter EMS versus ground EMS can be reduced, it is important to understand factors associated with helicopter transport of patients with minor injuries.
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to characterize patient and hospital characteristics associated with helicopter transport of patients with minor injuries.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of adults ≥18 years who were transported by helicopter to Level I/II trauma centers from 2009 through 2010 as identified in the National Trauma Data Bank. Minor injuries were defined as all injuries scored at an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of <3. Patient and hospital characteristics associated of being flown with only minor injuries were compared in an unadjusted and adjusted fashion. Hierarchical, multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for patient demographics, mechanism of injury, presenting physiology, injury severity, urban-rural location of injury, total EMS time, hospital characteristics, and region.
RESULTS: A total of 24,812 records were identified, corresponding to 76,090 helicopter transports. The proportion of helicopter transports with only minor injuries was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 34% to 39%). Patient characteristics associated with being flown with minor injuries included being uninsured (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.26 to 1.47), injury by a fall (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.45), or other penetrating trauma (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 2.12 to 3.00). Being flown with minor injuries was more likely if the patient was transported to a trauma center that also received a high proportion of patients with minor injuries by ground EMS (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.26) or a high proportion of EMS traffic by helicopter (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.78). No significant association with urban-rural scene location or EMS transport time was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Better recognizing which patients with falls and penetrating trauma have serious injuries that could benefit from being flown may lead to the more cost-effective use of helicopter EMS. More research is needed to determine why patients without insurance, who are most at risk for high out-of-pocket expenses from helicopter EMS, are at higher risk for being flown when only having minor injuries. This suggests that interventions to optimize cost-effectiveness of helicopter transport will likely require an evaluation of helicopter triage guidelines in the context of regional and patient needs.
© 2014 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25377400      PMCID: PMC4329240          DOI: 10.1111/acem.12512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  27 in total

1.  The cost of overtriage: more than one-third of low-risk injured patients were taken to major trauma centers.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Kristan Staudenmayer; Renee Y Hsia; N Clay Mann; Eileen M Bulger; James F Holmes; Ross Fleischman; Kyle Gorman; Jason Haukoos; K John McConnell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Helicopters and the civilian trauma system: national utilization patterns demonstrate improved outcomes after traumatic injury.

Authors:  Joshua B Brown; Nicole A Stassen; Paul E Bankey; Ayodele T Sangosanya; Julius D Cheng; Mark L Gestring
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-11

3.  A critical analysis of on-scene helicopter transport on survival in a statewide trauma system.

Authors:  C E Brathwaite; M Rosko; R McDowell; J Gallagher; J Proenca; M A Spott
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-07

4.  The emergent problem of ambulance misuse.

Authors:  E Brown; J Sindelar
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Impact of statistical approaches for handling missing data on trauma center quality.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel; Wayne Meredith; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  A systematic review of the costs and benefits of helicopter emergency medical services.

Authors:  Colman B Taylor; Mark Stevenson; Stephen Jan; Paul M Middleton; Michael Fitzharris; John A Myburgh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  A multiple imputation model for imputing missing physiologic data in the national trauma data bank.

Authors:  Lynne Moore; James A Hanley; Alexis F Turgeon; André Lavoie; Marcel Emond
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Hospital-based rotorcraft aeromedical emergency care services and trauma mortality: a multicenter study.

Authors:  W G Baxt; P Moody; H C Cleveland; R P Fischer; F N Kyes; M J Leicht; F Rouch; P Wiest
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  The impact of advanced prehospital emergency care on the mortality of severely brain-injured patients.

Authors:  W G Baxt; P Moody
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-04

10.  Effects of London helicopter emergency medical service on survival after trauma.

Authors:  J P Nicholl; J E Brazier; H A Snooks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-22
View more
  5 in total

1.  Development and Validation of the Air Medical Prehospital Triage Score for Helicopter Transport of Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Joshua B Brown; Mark L Gestring; Francis X Guyette; Matthew R Rosengart; Nicole A Stassen; Raquel M Forsythe; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Geospatial assessment of helicopter emergency medical service overtriage.

Authors:  Andrew-Paul Deeb; Heather M Phelos; Andrew B Peitzman; Timothy R Billiar; Jason L Sperry; Joshua B Brown
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.697

3.  Current Status of helicopter emergency medical services in China: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Ding Xu; Peng Luo; Sheng Li; Roman Pfeifer; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Polish Medical Air Rescue Interventions Concerning Pregnant Women in Poland: A 10-year Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Ewa Rzońca; Agnieszka Bień; Arkadiusz Wejnarski; Joanna Gotlib; Robert Gałązkowski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-11-16

5.  Association of Interfacility Helicopter versus Ground Ambulance Transport and in-Hospital Mortality among Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Kenneth Stewart; Tabitha Garwe; Babawale Oluborode; Zoona Sarwar; Roxie M Albrecht
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.