| Literature DB >> 25375933 |
Takashi Nakamae1, Yuki Sakai1, Yoshinari Abe2, Seiji Nishida2, Kenji Fukui2, Kei Yamada3, Manabu Kubota4, Damiaan Denys5, Jin Narumoto1.
Abstract
Fronto-striatal circuits are hypothesized to be involved in the pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Within this circuitry, ventral frontal regions project fibers to the ventral striatum (VS) and dorsal frontal regions to the dorsal striatum. Resting state fMRI research has shown higher functional connectivity between the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the dorsal part of the VS in OCD patients compared to healthy controls (HC). Therefore, we hypothesized that in OCD the OFC predominantly project fibers to the more dorsal part of the VS, and that the structural connectivity between the OFC and VS is higher compared to HC. A total of 20 non-medicated OCD patients and 20 HC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging. Connectivity-based parcellation analyses were performed with the striatum as seed region and the OFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex as target regions. Obtained connectivity maps for each frontal region of interest (ROI) were normalized into standard space, and Z-component (dorsal-ventral) coordinate of center-of-gravity (COG) were compared between two groups. Probabilistic tractography was performed to investigate diffusion indices of fibers between the striatum and frontal ROIs. COG Z-component coordinates of connectivity maps for OFC ROI were located in the more dorsal part of the VS in OCD patients compared to HC. Fractional anisotropy of fibers between the OFC and the striatum was higher in OCD patients compared to HC. Part of the pathophysiology of OCD might be understood by altered topography and structural connectivity of fibers between the OFC and the striatum.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25375933 PMCID: PMC4222976 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Explanation of connectivity and topography.
| Modality | Index | Biological Implications | |
| Functional connectivity | resting state fMRI | Correlation coefficient of BOLD signalfluctuation | Synchronization of brain activities betweenseed and target regions |
| Structural connectivity | Probabilistic tractography on DWI | Fractional anisotropy and radialdiffusivity of reconstructed fibers | Degree of myelination and number of fibersbetween seed and target regions |
| Fiber topography | Connectivity-based parcellation on DWI | COG of connectivity map | Distribution of fibers’ projection fromseed to target regions |
BOLD: blood oxygen level-dependent, COG: center-of-gravity, DWI: diffusion weighted imaging.
*Note that fractional anisotropy does not exactly represent strength of structural connectivity because it is modulated not only by degree of myelination and number of fibers but also by membrane permeability and fiber orientation in each voxel.
Figure 1The striatum and 3 frontal ROIs (OFC, DLFPC, and dACC) in the left hemisphere.
Figure 2Mean images of connectivity maps and connectivity-based ROIs of the striatum for each frontal ROI (OFC, DLPFC, and dACC) are shown on the same sagittal section (X = 14) in MNI152 standard space.
Images of all subjects from both HC and OCD groups are averaged and only the voxels where at least 10 of 40 subjects’ data are overlapped are shown. The ventral striatum had high probabilities of connection to OFC, while dorsal striatum had high probable connection with DLPFC and dACC. Connectivity-based ROIs are created by thresholding connectivity maps at 25% and used as the target ROIs in following probabilistic tractography analysis.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects in the healthy control and patient groups.
| Characteristic | Healthy Controls (n = 20) | Patients with OCD (n = 20) |
|
| Age, years | 32.9±6.9 | 35.3±9.4 | .363 |
| Sex, male/female | 9/11 | 6/14 | .514 |
| Handedness, right/left | 19/1 | 18/2 | 1.000 |
| Education, years | 15.1±1.9 | 14.1±2.2 | .133 |
| Age of onset, years | NA | 25.0±9.5 | NA |
| Duration of illness, years | NA | 10.3±6.5 | NA |
| Psychotropic medication naïve/free patients | no medication | 5/15 | NA |
| Length of past medication, months | NA | 20.2±26.5 | NA |
| Total Y-BOCS score | NA | 22.8±5.8 | NA |
| HDRS score | NA | 3.8±3.1 | NA |
| HARS score | NA | 5.3±4.5 | NA |
Abbreviations: HARS, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HDRS, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; NA, not applicable; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; Y-BOCS, Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.
Values represent the mean ± SD. For all scales, high scores denote greater severity.
χ test.
Independent sample t test.
Figure 3Mean images of connectivity maps for OFC ROI in HC (red-yellow) and OCD (blue-light blue) are shown in MNI152 standard space.
Images of all subjects in each group are averaged and only the voxels where at least 5 of 20 subjects’ data are overlapped are shown. The ventral striatum showed high probabilities of connection with the OFC in both groups. However, the regions with high probabilities spread into more dorsal part of the striatum in OCD compared to HC group.
Z-component (dorsal-ventral) coordinates of center-of-gravity (COG) for each connectivity map in the MNI152 standard space.
|
| ||||
| Seed ROI | Target ROI | Healthy Controls (n = 20) | Patients with OCD (n = 20) |
|
| Left striatum | OFC | −6.21±1.71 | −5.08±1.71 | .043 |
| DLPFC | 1.86±2.78 | 1.48±2.16 | .649 | |
| dACC | 7.11±2.33 | 7.41±1.92 | .573 | |
| Right striatum | OFC | −6.20±1.67 | −5.21±1.78 | .056 |
| DLPFC | 3.14±2.64 | 3.25±3.01 | .659 | |
| dACC | 10.05±4.05 | 9.60±4.56 | .574 | |
Abbreviations: dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; ROI, region of interest.
Analysis of covariance controlling for age and gender effects.
*P<.05 (not corrected for multiple comparisons).
Figure 4Mean images of probabilistic tractography results (green) that delineate fibers between the each frontal (blue) and striatum (red) regions are shown in MNI152 standard space.
Images of all subjects from both HC and OCD groups are averaged and only the voxels where at least 10 of 40 subjects’ data are overlapped are shown.
Fractional anisotropy value of fibers between each frontal region and the striatum in two groups.
| FA value, Mean (SD) | |||
| Fiber | Healthy Controls (n = 20) | Patients with OCD (n = 20) |
|
| L OFC-Striatum | 0.32±0.03 | 0.34±0.03 | .025 |
| L DLPFC-Striatum | 0.32±0.02 | 0.34±0.02 | .091 |
| L dACC-Striatum | 0.37±0.04 | 0.38±0.04 | .353 |
| R OFC-Striatum | 0.32±0.02 | 0.34±0.03 | .062 |
| R DLPFC-Striatum | 0.33±0.02 | 0.32±0.02 | .812 |
| R dACC-Striatum | 0.35±0.03 | 0.36±0.03 | .070 |
Abbreviations: dACC, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; FA, fractional anisotropy; L, left; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; R, right.
Analysis of covariance controlling for age and gender effects.
*P<.05 (not corrected for multiple comparisons).
Diffusion indices of fibers between the OFC and the striatum.
| Fibers | Diffusion indices | Healthy Controls (n = 20) | Patients with OCD (n = 20) |
|
| L OFC-Striatum | FA | 0.32±0.03 | 0.34±0.03 | .025 |
| MD | 0.81±0.03 | 0.79±0.03 | .160 | |
| AD | 1.11±0.06 | 1.11±0.05 | .901 | |
| RD | 0.66±0.04 | 0.64±0.03 | .043 | |
| R OFC-Striatum | FA | 0.32±0.02 | 0.34±0.03 | .062 |
| MD | 0.80±0.03 | 0.81±0.04 | .631 | |
| AD | 1.09±0.05 | 1.12±0.06 | .180 | |
| RD | 0.66±0.04 | 0.66±0.05 | .790 |
Abbreviations: AD, axial diffusivity; FA, fractional anisotropy; L, left; MD, mean diffusivity; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; R, right; RD, radial diffusivity.
Analysis of covariance controlling for age and gender effects.
*P<.05 (not corrected for multiple comparisons).
units = ×10−3 mm2/s.
Correlational analyses between age of onset, duration of illness, and Z-component coordinate of COG for each connectivity map in the patient group (N = 20).
| Connectivity Maps | Age of Onset | Duration of Illness | |||
| Seed ROI | Target ROI | Spearman’s |
| Spearman’s |
|
| L Striatum | OFC | −.442 | .051 | .044 | .855 |
| DLPFC | −.469 | .037 | −.290 | .214 | |
| dACC | −.459 | .042 | −.002 | .995 | |
| R Striatum | OFC | −.508 | .022 | −.045 | .850 |
| DLPFC | −.639 | .002 | .079 | .741 | |
| dACC | −.481 | .032 | .252 | .284 | |
*P<.05 (not corrected for multiple comparisons).