Literature DB >> 25375851

Comparative evaluation of higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia.

Jawahar Lal Goyal, Arushi Garg, Ritu Arora, Parul Jain, Yashpal Goel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, higher-order aberrations, and corneal asphericity (Q value) between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
METHODS: Forty patients were randomly selected to receive wavefront-guided LASIK (wavefront-guided group) or aspheric LASIK (aspheric group) (40 eyes of 20 patients in each group) using the Technolas 217z excimer laser platform (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). Flaps were created using the Zyoptix XP microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb). Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corneal topography, wavefront aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity. Minimum follow-up period was 6 months.
RESULTS: At 6 months postoperatively, the aspheric group had significantly better UDVA (logMAR 0.04 ± 0.04 [Snellen 20/16] [range: -0.079 to 0.000]) and lower mean residual spherical error (+0.10 ± 0.52 diopters [D] [range: -1.12 to 1.25 D]) than the wavefront-guided group (logMAR UDVA 0.00 ± 0.07 [range: -0.079 to 0.176]; MRSE -0.35 ± 0.47 D [range: -1.5 to 0.62 D]) (P = .003 and < .001, respectively). Mean change in higher-order aberration root mean square at 6 months postoperatively (6-mm pupil) was 0.16 ± 0.17 µm after aspheric LASIK and 0.27 ± 0.28 µm after wavefront-guided LASIK (P = .02). Aspheric LASIK induced minimal change in spherical aberrations postoperatively (0.03 ± 0.12 µm, P = .09), unlike wavefront-guided LASIK (0.23 ± 0.17 µm, P < .01). Change in Q value was significantly less in the aspheric group (0.53 ± 0.31) than the wavefront-guided group (0.91 ± 0.30) (P < .01). The aspheric group had significant improvement in contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies (P < .01), whereas the wavefront-guided group showed a slight decrease at higher spatial frequency (18 cycles per degree).
CONCLUSIONS: Aspheric LASIK induced significantly less change in higher-order aberrations and maintained corneal asphericity better than wavefront-guided LASIK. The visual outcome and contrast sensitivity was better in the aspheric group at 6 months postoperatively. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25375851     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20141021-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Ning-Li Wang; Samuel A Abariga
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-18

2.  Corneal biomechanics after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q-value-guided femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Li Zheng; Xia Zhao; Yang Xu; Shu Chen
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-03

3.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Anterior Corneal Change in Asphericity Calculated by the Tangential Radius of Curvature after LASIK.

Authors:  Jinglu Ying; Jianqiu Cai; Leru Zhu; Yi Zha
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Comparative evaluation of visual outcomes and corneal asphericity after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with the six-dimension Amaris excimer laser system.

Authors:  JunJie Piao; Ying-Jun Li; Woong-Joo Whang; Mihyun Choi; Min Ji Kang; Jee Hye Lee; Geunyoung Yoon; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of higher order wavefront aberrations with four aberrometers.

Authors:  William H Cook; James McKelvie; Henry B Wallace; Stuti L Misra
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Refractive, visual, and subjective quality of vision outcomes for very high myopia LASIK from - 10.00 to - 13.50 diopters.

Authors:  Avi Wallerstein; Joseph Wai Keung Kam; Mathieu Gauvin; Eser Adiguzel; Mounir Bashour; Ananda Kalevar; Mark Cohen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Comparison of Low Degree/High Degree and Zernike Expansions for Evaluating Simulation Outcomes After Customized Aspheric Laser Corrections.

Authors:  Damien Gatinel; Jacques Malet; Laurent Dumas; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Corneal aberrations after small-incision lenticule extraction versus Q value-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Li Zheng; Xia Zhao; Yi Sun; Wei Feng; Minhui Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.