Punam Ohri-Vachaspati1, Derek DeLia2, Robin S DeWeese1, Noe C Crespo1, Michael Todd3, Michael J Yedidia2. 1. 1School of Nutrition and Health Promotion,Arizona State University,500 N 3rd Street,Phoenix,AZ 85004-2135,USA. 2. 2Center for State Health Policy,Institute for Health,Health Care Policy,& Aging Research,Rutgers University,New Brunswick,NJ,USA. 3. 3College of Nursing and Health Innovation,Arizona State University,Phoenix,AZ,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Social Ecological Model (SEM) has been used to describe the aetiology of childhood obesity and to develop a framework for prevention. The current paper applies the SEM to data collected at multiple levels, representing different layers of the SEM, and examines the unique and relative contribution of each layer to children's weight status. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of randomly selected households with children living in low-income diverse communities. SETTING: A telephone survey conducted in 2009-2010 collected information on parental perceptions of their neighbourhoods, and household, parent and child demographic characteristics. Parents provided measured height and weight data for their children. Geocoded data were used to calculate proximity of a child's residence to food and physical activity outlets. SUBJECTS: Analysis based on 560 children whose parents participated in the survey and provided measured heights and weights. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression models were estimated to determine the joint contribution of elements within each layer of the SEM as well as the relative contribution of each layer. Layers of the SEM representing parental perceptions of their neighbourhoods, parent demographics and neighbourhood characteristics made the strongest contributions to predicting whether a child was overweight or obese. Layers of the SEM representing food and physical activity environments made smaller, but still significant, contributions to predicting children's weight status. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used herein supports using the SEM for predicting child weight status and uncovers some of the most promising domains and strategies for childhood obesity prevention that can be used for designing interventions.
OBJECTIVE: The Social Ecological Model (SEM) has been used to describe the aetiology of childhood obesity and to develop a framework for prevention. The current paper applies the SEM to data collected at multiple levels, representing different layers of the SEM, and examines the unique and relative contribution of each layer to children's weight status. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of randomly selected households with children living in low-income diverse communities. SETTING: A telephone survey conducted in 2009-2010 collected information on parental perceptions of their neighbourhoods, and household, parent and child demographic characteristics. Parents provided measured height and weight data for their children. Geocoded data were used to calculate proximity of a child's residence to food and physical activity outlets. SUBJECTS: Analysis based on 560 children whose parents participated in the survey and provided measured heights and weights. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression models were estimated to determine the joint contribution of elements within each layer of the SEM as well as the relative contribution of each layer. Layers of the SEM representing parental perceptions of their neighbourhoods, parent demographics and neighbourhood characteristics made the strongest contributions to predicting whether a child was overweight or obese. Layers of the SEM representing food and physical activity environments made smaller, but still significant, contributions to predicting children's weight status. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used herein supports using the SEM for predicting child weight status and uncovers some of the most promising domains and strategies for childhood obesity prevention that can be used for designing interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Childhood obesity; Social Ecological Model
Authors: Jennifer Wolch; Michael Jerrett; Kim Reynolds; Rob McConnell; Roger Chang; Nicholas Dahmann; Kirby Brady; Frank Gilliland; Jason G Su; Kiros Berhane Journal: Health Place Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Stephanie B Jilcott; Scott Wade; Jared T McGuirt; Qiang Wu; Suzanne Lazorick; Justin B Moore Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Callie L Brown; Elizabeth E Halvorson; Gail M Cohen; Suzanne Lazorick; Joseph A Skelton Journal: Pediatr Clin North Am Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 3.278
Authors: Sara E Schaefer; Rosa Gomez-Camacho; Lisa Martinez; Banafsheh Sadeghi; J Bruce German; Adela de la Torre Journal: J Community Health Date: 2016-04
Authors: Julia I Bravin; Angela P Gutierrez; Jessica L McCurley; Scott C Roesch; Carmen R Isasi; Alan M Delamater; Krista M Perreira; Linda Van Horn; Sheila F Castañeda; Elizabeth R Pulgaron; Gregory A Talavera; Martha L Daviglus; Maria Lopez-Class; Donglin Zeng; Linda C Gallo Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2019-03-25
Authors: Margaret Raber; Maria C Swartz; Diane Santa Maria; Teresia O'Connor; Tom Baranowski; Rhea Li; Joya Chandra Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Robin S DeWeese; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati; Marc A Adams; Jonathan Kurka; Seung Yong Han; Michael Todd; Michael J Yedidia Journal: Health Place Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.078