Chenjuan Ma1, Matthew D McHugh, Linda H Aiken. 1. *National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, University of Kansas School of Nursing, Kansas City, KS †Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Blvd., Fagin Hall Rm379, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Growing scrutiny of readmissions has placed hospitals at the center of readmission prevention. Little is known, however, about hospital nursing—a critical organizational component of hospital service system—in relation to readmissions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationships between hospital nursing factors—nurse work environment, nurse staffing, and nurse education—and 30-day readmissions among Medicare patients undergoing general, orthopedic, and vascular surgery. METHOD AND DESIGN: We linked Medicare patient discharge data, multistate nurse survey data, and American Hospital Association Annual Survey data. Our sample included 220,914 Medicare surgical patients and 25,082 nurses from 528 hospitals in 4 states (California, Florida, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania). Risk-adjusted robust logistic regressions were used for analyses. RESULTS: The average 30-day readmission rate was 10% in our sample (general surgery: 11%; orthopedic surgery: 8%; vascular surgery: 12%). Readmission rates varied widely across surgical procedures and could be as high as 26% (upper limb and toe amputation for circulatory system disorders). Each additional patient per nurse increased the odds of readmission by 3% (OR=1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05). Patients cared in hospitals with better nurse work environments had lower odds of readmission (OR=0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). Administrative support to nursing practice (OR=0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and nurse-physician relations (OR=0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99) were 2 main attributes of the work environment that were associated with readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Better nurse staffing and work environment were significantly associated with 30-day readmission, and can be considered as system-level interventions to reduce readmissions and associated financial penalties.
BACKGROUND: Growing scrutiny of readmissions has placed hospitals at the center of readmission prevention. Little is known, however, about hospital nursing—a critical organizational component of hospital service system—in relation to readmissions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationships between hospital nursing factors—nurse work environment, nurse staffing, and nurse education—and 30-day readmissions among Medicare patients undergoing general, orthopedic, and vascular surgery. METHOD AND DESIGN: We linked Medicare patient discharge data, multistate nurse survey data, and American Hospital Association Annual Survey data. Our sample included 220,914 Medicare surgical patients and 25,082 nurses from 528 hospitals in 4 states (California, Florida, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania). Risk-adjusted robust logistic regressions were used for analyses. RESULTS: The average 30-day readmission rate was 10% in our sample (general surgery: 11%; orthopedic surgery: 8%; vascular surgery: 12%). Readmission rates varied widely across surgical procedures and could be as high as 26% (upper limb and toe amputation for circulatory system disorders). Each additional patient per nurse increased the odds of readmission by 3% (OR=1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05). Patients cared in hospitals with better nurse work environments had lower odds of readmission (OR=0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99). Administrative support to nursing practice (OR=0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and nurse-physician relations (OR=0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99) were 2 main attributes of the work environment that were associated with readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Better nurse staffing and work environment were significantly associated with 30-day readmission, and can be considered as system-level interventions to reduce readmissions and associated financial penalties.
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Douglas M Sloane; Herbert L Smith; Linda Flynn; Donna F Neff Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Matthew J Press; Jeffrey H Silber; Amy K Rosen; Patrick S Romano; Kamal M F Itani; Jingsan Zhu; Yanli Wang; Orit Even-Shoshan; Michael J Halenar; Kevin G Volpp Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-11-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Sean P Clarke; Linda Flynn; Jean Ann Seago; Joanne Spetz; Herbert L Smith Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; Susannah M Bernheim; Joseph S Ross; Jeph Herrin; Jacqueline N Grady; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth E Drye; Zhenqiu Lin Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Deborah R Kaye; Caroline R Richardson; Zaojun Ye; Lindsey A Herrel; Chad Ellimoottil; David C Miller Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Grant R Martsolf; Teresa B Gibson; Richele Benevent; H Joanna Jiang; Carol Stocks; Emily D Ehrlich; Ryan Kandrack; David I Auerbach Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-02-21 Impact factor: 3.402