Leora I Horwitz1,2,3, Yongfei Wang4,5, Faseeha K Altaf4, Changqin Wang4,6, Zhenqiu Lin4, Shuling Liu4, Jacqueline Grady4, Susannah M Bernheim4,6, Nihar R Desai4,5, Arjun K Venkatesh4,7, Jeph Herrin5,8. 1. Department of Population Health, Division of Healthcare Delivery Science, NYU School of Medicine. 2. Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science, NYU Langone Health. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 4. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital. 5. Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 8. Health Research & Educational Trust, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whether types of hospitals with high readmission rates also have high overall postdischarge acute care utilization (including emergency department and observation care) is unknown. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SUBJECTS: Nonfederal United States acute care hospitals. MEASURES: Using methodology established by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, we calculated each hospital's "excess days in acute care" for fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries aged over 65 years discharged after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure (HF), or pneumonia, representing the mean difference between predicted and expected total days of acute care utilization in the 30 days following hospital discharge, per 100 discharges. We assessed the multivariable association of 8 hospital characteristics with excess days in acute care and the proportion of hospitals with each characteristic that were statistical outliers (95% credible interval estimate does not include 0). RESULTS: We included 2184 hospitals for acute myocardial infarction [228 (10.4%) better than expected, 549 (25.1%) worse than expected], 3720 hospitals for HF [484 (13.0%) better and 840 (22.6%) worse], and 4195 hospitals for pneumonia [673 (16.0%) better, 1005 (24.0%) worse]. Results for all conditions were similar. Worse than expected outliers for pneumonia included: 18.8% of safety net hospitals versus 26.1% of nonsafety net hospitals; 16.7% of public hospitals versus 33.1% of for-profit hospitals; 19.5% of nonteaching hospitals versus 52.2% of major teaching hospitals; 7.9% of rural hospitals versus 42.1% of large urban hospitals; 5.9% of hospitals with 24-<50 beds versus 58% of hospitals with >500 beds; and 29.0% of hospitals with nurse-to-bed ratios >1.0-1.5 versus 21.7% of hospitals with ratios >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: Including emergency department and observation stays in measures of postdischarge utilization produces similar results as measuring only readmissions in that major teaching, urban and for-profit hospitals still perform disproportionately poorly versus nonteaching or public hospitals. However, it enables identification of more outliers and a more granular assessment of the association of hospital factors and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Whether types of hospitals with high readmission rates also have high overall postdischarge acute care utilization (including emergency department and observation care) is unknown. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SUBJECTS: Nonfederal United States acute care hospitals. MEASURES: Using methodology established by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, we calculated each hospital's "excess days in acute care" for fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries aged over 65 years discharged after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure (HF), or pneumonia, representing the mean difference between predicted and expected total days of acute care utilization in the 30 days following hospital discharge, per 100 discharges. We assessed the multivariable association of 8 hospital characteristics with excess days in acute care and the proportion of hospitals with each characteristic that were statistical outliers (95% credible interval estimate does not include 0). RESULTS: We included 2184 hospitals for acute myocardial infarction [228 (10.4%) better than expected, 549 (25.1%) worse than expected], 3720 hospitals for HF [484 (13.0%) better and 840 (22.6%) worse], and 4195 hospitals for pneumonia [673 (16.0%) better, 1005 (24.0%) worse]. Results for all conditions were similar. Worse than expected outliers for pneumonia included: 18.8% of safety net hospitals versus 26.1% of nonsafety net hospitals; 16.7% of public hospitals versus 33.1% of for-profit hospitals; 19.5% of nonteaching hospitals versus 52.2% of major teaching hospitals; 7.9% of rural hospitals versus 42.1% of large urban hospitals; 5.9% of hospitals with 24-<50 beds versus 58% of hospitals with >500 beds; and 29.0% of hospitals with nurse-to-bed ratios >1.0-1.5 versus 21.7% of hospitals with ratios >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: Including emergency department and observation stays in measures of postdischarge utilization produces similar results as measuring only readmissions in that major teaching, urban and for-profit hospitals still perform disproportionately poorly versus nonteaching or public hospitals. However, it enables identification of more outliers and a more granular assessment of the association of hospital factors and outcomes.
Authors: Joseph S Ross; Stephen S Cha; Andrew J Epstein; Yongfei Wang; Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Judith H Lichtman; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Frederick A Masoudi; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; Chohreh Partovian; Zhenqiu Lin; Jacqueline N Grady; Jeph Herrin; Mitchell Conover; Julia Montague; Chloe Dillaway; Kathleen Bartczak; Lisa G Suter; Joseph S Ross; Susannah M Bernheim; Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth E Drye Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: J J Allison; C I Kiefe; N W Weissman; S D Person; M Rousculp; J G Canto; S Bae; O D Williams; R Farmer; R M Centor Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter K Lindenauer; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth E Drye; Zhenqiu Lin; Katherine Goodrich; Mayur M Desai; Dale W Bratzler; Walter J O'Donnell; Mark L Metersky; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Harlan M Krumholz; Zhenqiu Lin; Elizabeth E Drye; Mayur M Desai; Lein F Han; Michael T Rapp; Jennifer A Mattera; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2011-03
Authors: Jay G Berry; Sara L Toomey; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ashish K Jha; Mari M Nakamura; David J Klein; Jeremy Y Feng; Shanna Shulman; Vincent W Chiang; Vincent K Chiang; William Kaplan; Matt Hall; Mark A Schuster Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anita A Vashi; Justin P Fox; Brendan G Carr; Gail D'Onofrio; Jesse M Pines; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Leora I Horwitz; Zhenqiu Lin; Jeph Herrin; Susannah Bernheim; Elizabeth E Drye; Harlan M Krumholz; Harold J Hines; Joseph S Ross Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-02-09
Authors: Ann M Sheehy; W Ryan Powell; Farah A Kaiksow; William R Buckingham; Christie M Bartels; Jen Birstler; Menggang Yu; Andrea Gilmore Bykovskyi; Fangfang Shi; Amy J H Kind Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Roxanne Kovacs; Garrett W Brown; Artwell Kadungure; Søren R Kristensen; Gwati Gwati; Laura Anselmi; Nicholas Midzi; Josephine Borghi Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Hayley D Germack; Khadejah Mahmoud; Mandy Cooper; Heather Vincent; Krista Koller; Grant R Martsolf Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 2.655