Literature DB >> 21084321

Risk factors for hospital-acquired 'poor glycemic control': a case-control study.

Matthew D McHugh1, Jingjing Shang, Douglas M Sloane, Linda H Aiken.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the patient and hospital characteristics associated with severe manifestations of 'poor glycemic control'-a 'no-pay' hospital-acquired condition defined by the US Medicare program based on hospital claims related to severe complications of diabetes.
DESIGN: A nested case-control study.
SETTING: California acute care hospitals from 2005 to 2006. PARTICIPANTS: All cases (n= 261) with manifestations of poor glycemic control not present on admission admitted to California acute care hospitals from 2005 to 2006 and 261 controls were matched (1:1) using administrative data for age, sex, major diagnostic category and severity of illness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for experiencing poor glycemic control.
RESULTS: Deaths (16 vs. 9%, P= 0.01) and total costs ($26,125 vs. $18,233, P= 0.026) were significantly higher among poor glycemic control cases. Risk-adjusted conditional logistic regression revealed that each additional chronic condition increased the odds of poor glycemic control by 12% (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04-1.22). The interaction of registered nurse staffing and hospital teaching status suggested that in non-teaching hospitals, each additional nursing hour per adjusted patient day significantly reduced the odds of poor glycemic control by 16% (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96). Nurse staffing was not significant in teaching hospitals (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.88-1.11).
CONCLUSIONS: Severe poor glycemic control complications are relatively rare but meaningful events with disproportionately high costs and mortality. Increasing nurse staffing may be an effective strategy in reducing poor glycemic control complications particularly in non-teaching hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21084321      PMCID: PMC3023952          DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  31 in total

1.  Prevalence of hyper- and hypoglycemia among inpatients with diabetes: a national survey of 44 U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Deborah J Wexler; James B Meigs; Enrico Cagliero; David M Nathan; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Does date stamping ICD-9-CM codes increase the value of clinical information in administrative data?

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Evaluation of nursing work effort and perceptions about blood glucose testing in tight glycemic control.

Authors:  Daleen Aragon
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 5.  Patient safety and inpatient glycemic control: translating concepts into action.

Authors:  Richard Hellman
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors and outcomes.

Authors:  James S Krinsley; Aarti Grover
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Hospital inpatient costs for adults with multiple chronic conditions.

Authors:  Bernard Friedman; H Joanna Jiang; Anne Elixhauser; Andrew Segal
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  How often are potential patient safety events present on admission?

Authors:  Robert L Houchens; Anne Elixhauser; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-03

9.  Analysis of healthcare resource utilization with intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Greet Van den Berghe; Pieter J Wouters; Katrien Kesteloot; Daniel E Hilleman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Benefits and risks of tight glucose control in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Daniel C Wiener; Robin J Larson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Contradicting fears, California's nurse-to-patient mandate did not reduce the skill level of the nursing workforce in hospitals.

Authors:  Matthew D McHugh; Lesly A Kelly; Douglas M Sloane; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Organization of Hospital Nursing and 30-Day Readmissions in Medicare Patients Undergoing Surgery.

Authors:  Chenjuan Ma; Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Patient Self-Management of Diabetes Care in the Inpatient Setting: Pro.

Authors:  Melanie E Mabrey; Tracy L Setji
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-19

4.  Hospitals with higher nurse staffing had lower odds of readmissions penalties than hospitals with lower staffing.

Authors:  Matthew D McHugh; Julie Berez; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Lower mortality for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high-volume hospitals is contingent upon nurse staffing.

Authors:  Kelly L Wiltse Nicely; Douglas M Sloane; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Patient outcomes and cost savings associated with hospital safe nurse staffing legislation: an observational study.

Authors:  Karen B Lasater; Linda H Aiken; Douglas Sloane; Rachel French; Brendan Martin; Maryann Alexander; Matthew D McHugh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.