BACKGROUND: Cleft in the lip and/or the palate (CL/P) is considered to be a lifelong condition, yet relatively little is known about the long-term outcomes for patients. Existing literature is largely outdated and conflicted, with an almost exclusive focus on medical aspects and deficits. OBJECTIVE: To explore the psychological adjustment and possible support needs of a large number of adults born with CL/P from their own perspective. DESIGN: Fifty-two individual telephone interviews eliciting qualitative data. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis identified five themes. Participants reported a range of challenges in relation to discharge from the service, additional surgery as an adult, social and romantic relationships, higher education, vocational achievement, and access to psychological support. The findings imply that most adults with a cleft adjust well to these challenges and report many positive outcomes. For a minority of patients, issues attributed to the cleft may continue to cause distress in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CL/P may require psychological support, information about the heritability of cleft, signposting and referrals from nonspecialists, support regarding further treatment, and opportunities to take part in research and activities. New issues arising in adulthood, such as entering the workplace, forming long-term relationships, and starting a family, may warrant both further investigation and additional support. Further work is needed to identify the factors that contribute to psychological distress and resilience, as well as the timing of particular points of risk and opportunity for personal growth.
BACKGROUND:Cleft in the lip and/or the palate (CL/P) is considered to be a lifelong condition, yet relatively little is known about the long-term outcomes for patients. Existing literature is largely outdated and conflicted, with an almost exclusive focus on medical aspects and deficits. OBJECTIVE: To explore the psychological adjustment and possible support needs of a large number of adults born with CL/P from their own perspective. DESIGN: Fifty-two individual telephone interviews eliciting qualitative data. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis identified five themes. Participants reported a range of challenges in relation to discharge from the service, additional surgery as an adult, social and romantic relationships, higher education, vocational achievement, and access to psychological support. The findings imply that most adults with a cleft adjust well to these challenges and report many positive outcomes. For a minority of patients, issues attributed to the cleft may continue to cause distress in adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with CL/P may require psychological support, information about the heritability of cleft, signposting and referrals from nonspecialists, support regarding further treatment, and opportunities to take part in research and activities. New issues arising in adulthood, such as entering the workplace, forming long-term relationships, and starting a family, may warrant both further investigation and additional support. Further work is needed to identify the factors that contribute to psychological distress and resilience, as well as the timing of particular points of risk and opportunity for personal growth.
Authors: N M Stock; N D Sharratt; J Heath; D Nankivell; A Martindale; M Ridley; A Ahmed; A McMullin; C Cunniffe Journal: Br Dent J Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 1.626
Authors: Adam D Glener; Alexander C Allori; Ronnie L Shammas; Anna R Carlson; Irene J Pien; Arthur S Aylsworth; Robert Meyer; Luiz Pimenta; Ronald Strauss; Stephanie Watkins; Jeffrey R Marcus Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2017-06-29
Authors: Karim A Sakran; Sixing Song; Huo Li; Peiyue Pan; Nan Chen; Ni Zeng; Ting Chi; Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang; Yan Wang; Caixia Gong Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Christina Dardani; Laurence J Howe; Nandita Mukhopadhyay; Evie Stergiakouli; Yvonne Wren; Kerry Humphries; Amy Davies; Karen Ho; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Elisabeth Mangold; Kerstin U Ludwig; Caroline L Relton; George Davey Smith; Sarah J Lewis; Jonathan Sandy; Neil M Davies; Gemma C Sharp Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196