Ryan Richard Ruff1,2, Lacey Sischo3, Hillary Broder3. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA. 2. New York University College of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Restorative interventions for cleft lip and palate involve annual evaluations, adjunct treatment, and multiple surgeries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal impact of cleft surgery on psychosocial functioning among youth with cleft. METHODS: Data were derived from a 5-year, multicenter, prospective longitudinal study of children with cleft (N = 1196). Children completed psychological inventories for self-concept, anxiety, depression, mastery, and relatedness. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of craniofacial surgery for cleft on psychosocial outcomes over time. RESULTS: There were 1196 participants at baseline, of whom 258 (27.5%) received a surgical intervention prior to their 1st follow-up visit. Approximately 78% of participants had cleft lip and palate, and 22% had cleft palate only. Surgery receipt was significantly associated with lower relatedness (β = -1.48, 95% CI = -2.91, -0.05) and mastery (β = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.49, -0.15) scores, although overall scores appeared to increase over time. Surgery was not related to anxiety (β = -0.15, 95% CI = -1.08, 0.79), depression (β = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.65, 1.01), and self-concept (β = -0.84, 95% CI = -1.83, 0.15). The treatment-time interaction was not significant. Significant differences in psychosocial functioning were found across sex, race/ethnicity, and age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery may have negative short-term impacts on psychosocial functioning, although effects may diminish over time. Given the limited postsurgical follow-up period, long-term change in psychological well-being and the moderating effects of surgery may not be fully realized. Further follow-up of children with cleft through adulthood to explore developmental trajectories of psychosocial functioning in more detail is recommended.
OBJECTIVES: Restorative interventions for cleft lip and palate involve annual evaluations, adjunct treatment, and multiple surgeries. The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal impact of cleft surgery on psychosocial functioning among youth with cleft. METHODS: Data were derived from a 5-year, multicenter, prospective longitudinal study of children with cleft (N = 1196). Children completed psychological inventories for self-concept, anxiety, depression, mastery, and relatedness. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the effects of craniofacial surgery for cleft on psychosocial outcomes over time. RESULTS: There were 1196 participants at baseline, of whom 258 (27.5%) received a surgical intervention prior to their 1st follow-up visit. Approximately 78% of participants had cleft lip and palate, and 22% had cleft palate only. Surgery receipt was significantly associated with lower relatedness (β = -1.48, 95% CI = -2.91, -0.05) and mastery (β = -1.32, 95% CI = -2.49, -0.15) scores, although overall scores appeared to increase over time. Surgery was not related to anxiety (β = -0.15, 95% CI = -1.08, 0.79), depression (β = 0.18, 95% CI = -0.65, 1.01), and self-concept (β = -0.84, 95% CI = -1.83, 0.15). The treatment-time interaction was not significant. Significant differences in psychosocial functioning were found across sex, race/ethnicity, and age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery may have negative short-term impacts on psychosocial functioning, although effects may diminish over time. Given the limited postsurgical follow-up period, long-term change in psychological well-being and the moderating effects of surgery may not be fully realized. Further follow-up of children with cleft through adulthood to explore developmental trajectories of psychosocial functioning in more detail is recommended.
Authors: Ana Paula Corrêa de Queiroz Herkrath; Fernando José Herkrath; Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo; Mario Vianna Vettore Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Date: 2014-05-07
Authors: Hillary L Broder; Canice E Crerand; Ryan R Ruff; Alexandre Peshansky; David B Sarwer; Lacey Sischo Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: Ryan Richard Ruff; Tamarinda J Barry Godín; Topaz Murray Small; Richard Niederman Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 2.757