| Literature DB >> 25370397 |
Sibel Kocabeyoglu, Mehmet C Mocan, Ibrahim C Haznedaroglu, Aysegul Uner, Enes Uzunosmanoglu, Murat Irkec1.
Abstract
In this paper, we report two cases of a 62-year-old patient presented with blurred vision and a 45-year-old male diagnosed with multiple myeloma who was referred from the Department of Oncology. Slit-lamp examination, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), systemic work-up and serum protein electrophoresis were obtained. In both patients, slit-lamp findings revealed bilateral diffuse subepithelial and anterior stromal crystals and IVCM showed highly reflective deposits in the corneal epithelium and stroma. The first patient was eventually diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance following bone marrow biopsy and systemic evaluation. Unusual corneal deposits may constitute the first sign of monoclonal gammopathies. IVCM may be helpful in showing the crystalline nature of the corneal deposits and guiding the clinician to the diagnosis of gammopathies. Both ophthalmologists and oncologists should be aware that corneal deposits may herald a life-threatening hematologic disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25370397 PMCID: PMC4244741 DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.143933
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1Diffuse infiltration of the central and peripheral cornea without any signs of epitheliopathy in the case with immunoglobulin A-kappa monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance
Figure 2In vivo confocal microscopy images of case number 1. (a) Immunoprotein deposition at the level of anterior stroma with sparing of the epithelium. The epithelium-stromal junction is highlighted with arrows. (b) Presence of both granular and spindle-like hyperintense deposits in the corneal stroma
Figure 3(a) Depiction of the abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow biopsy of the patient with immunoglobulin G-kappa multiple myeloma. (b) Diffuse staining of the bone marrow with CD-138 marker
Figure 4In vivo confocal microscopy images of case number 2. (a) Dense infiltration of the corneal epithelium with typical centrally hypointense slender crystalline deposits. (b) An oblique section at the epithelium-cornea junction depicting the localization of the immunoprotein deposits to the epithelial layer with uninvolved stromal appearance. The characteristic morphology of the immunoprotein deposit with a central hypointense lumen and hyperintense borders is depicted with arrows. (c) The endothelium appeared to be devoid of crystalline infiltration and of normal cellular morphology