BACKGROUND: Microorganism adhesion on polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty is a concern. Many studies have focused on vitamin E-stabilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), whereas first-generation, highly crosslinked UHMWPE, which is the most commonly used in clinical practice, has been scarcely evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed (1) to compare the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans with virgin (untreated) UHMWPE (PE) and crosslinked UHMWPE (XLPE); (2) to correlate the results with the biomaterial surface properties; and (3) to determine whether the decreased adhesion on vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE (VE-PE) previously recorded for bacteria can also be confirmed for C albicans. METHODS: Microbial adhesion of biofilm-producing American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and clinical strains on XLPE and VE-PE were compared with PE at 3, 7, 24, and 48 hours of incubation and quantified, as colony forming units (CFU)/mL, using a sonication protocol. Sample surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness and contact angle measurements, attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to reveal qualitative differences in surface composition and topography that could influence the microbial adhesion. The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and tested by unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: All microorganisms, both ATCC and clinical strains, showed lower adhesion (p < 0.05) on XLPE with adhesion percentages ranging from 18% to 25%, compared with PE with adhesion percentages ranging from 51% to 55%, after 48 hours. Only the ATCC S epidermidis showed a reduced adhesion profile even at 3 hours (adhesion ratio of 14% on XLPE versus 50% on PE) and 24 hours (19% on XLPE versus 55% on PE) of incubation. ATCC and clinical C albicans were less adherent to XLPE than to PE (p < 0.05) showing even at the earlier incubation time points adhesion values always of 10(3) CFU/mL and 10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. Roughness and contact angle were 0.8 ± 0.2 μm and 92° ± 3°, respectively, with no differences among samples. Qualitative differences in the surface chemical composition were revealed by XPS only. A confirmation of the decreased adhesion on VE-PE respect to PE was also registered here for C albicans strains (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin E stabilization and crosslinking of UHMWPE are capable of reducing microbial adhesion. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of modulation of microbial adhesion to medical-grade UHMWPE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that VE-PE and XLPE may have an added benefit of being more resistant to bacterial adhesion, even fungal strains.
BACKGROUND: Microorganism adhesion on polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty is a concern. Many studies have focused on vitamin E-stabilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), whereas first-generation, highly crosslinked UHMWPE, which is the most commonly used in clinical practice, has been scarcely evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We aimed (1) to compare the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans with virgin (untreated) UHMWPE (PE) and crosslinked UHMWPE (XLPE); (2) to correlate the results with the biomaterial surface properties; and (3) to determine whether the decreased adhesion on vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE (VE-PE) previously recorded for bacteria can also be confirmed for C albicans. METHODS: Microbial adhesion of biofilm-producing American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and clinical strains on XLPE and VE-PE were compared with PE at 3, 7, 24, and 48 hours of incubation and quantified, as colony forming units (CFU)/mL, using a sonication protocol. Sample surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness and contact angle measurements, attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to reveal qualitative differences in surface composition and topography that could influence the microbial adhesion. The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and tested by unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: All microorganisms, both ATCC and clinical strains, showed lower adhesion (p < 0.05) on XLPE with adhesion percentages ranging from 18% to 25%, compared with PE with adhesion percentages ranging from 51% to 55%, after 48 hours. Only the ATCC S epidermidis showed a reduced adhesion profile even at 3 hours (adhesion ratio of 14% on XLPE versus 50% on PE) and 24 hours (19% on XLPE versus 55% on PE) of incubation. ATCC and clinical C albicans were less adherent to XLPE than to PE (p < 0.05) showing even at the earlier incubation time points adhesion values always of 10(3) CFU/mL and 10(4) CFU/mL, respectively. Roughness and contact angle were 0.8 ± 0.2 μm and 92° ± 3°, respectively, with no differences among samples. Qualitative differences in the surface chemical composition were revealed by XPS only. A confirmation of the decreased adhesion on VE-PE respect to PE was also registered here for C albicans strains (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Vitamin E stabilization and crosslinking of UHMWPE are capable of reducing microbial adhesion. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of modulation of microbial adhesion to medical-grade UHMWPE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that VE-PE and XLPE may have an added benefit of being more resistant to bacterial adhesion, even fungal strains.
Authors: Alexandra H C Poulsson; Stephen A Mitchell; Marcus R Davidson; Alan J Johnstone; Neil Emmison; Robert H Bradley Journal: Langmuir Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Luigi Costa; Pierangiola Bracco; Elena Maria Brach del Prever; Steven M Kurtz; Paolo Gallinaro Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Alessandro Bidossi; Monica Bortolin; Marco Toscano; Elena De Vecchi; Carlo L Romanò; Roberto Mattina; Lorenzo Drago Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Franca Vergalito; Laura Pietrangelo; Giulio Petronio Petronio; Federica Colitto; Marco Alfio Cutuli; Irene Magnifico; Noemi Venditti; Germano Guerra; Roberto Di Marco Journal: Open Med (Wars) Date: 2019-12-26
Authors: Giuliana Banche; Anna Maria Cuffini; Sara Comini; Narcisa Mandras; Maria Rita Iannantuoni; Francesca Menotti; Andrea Giuseppe Musumeci; Giorgia Piersigilli; Valeria Allizond Journal: Microbiol Spectr Date: 2021-11-10
Authors: Arianna B Lovati; Marta Bottagisio; Susanna Maraldi; Martina B Violatto; Monica Bortolin; Elena De Vecchi; Paolo Bigini; Lorenzo Drago; Carlo L Romanò Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.176