Adam L Green1, Shakti H Ramkissoon1, Dilara McCauley1, Kristen Jones1, Jennifer A Perry1, Jessie Hao-Ru Hsu1, Lori A Ramkissoon1, Cecile L Maire1, Benjamin Hubbell-Engler1, David S Knoff1, Sharon Shacham1, Keith L Ligon1, Andrew L Kung1. 1. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (A.L.G., J.A.P., J.H.-R.H., B.H.-E.); Division of Hematology-Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (A.L.G.); Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (S.H.R., L.A.R., C.L.M., D.S.K., K.L.L.); Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (S.H.R., K.L.L.); Karyopharm Therapeutics, Natick, Massachusetts (D.M., S.S.); Lurie Family Imaging Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (K.J.); Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (K.L.L.); Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.L.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is poorly responsive to current chemotherapy. The nuclear transporter exportin 1 (XPO1, CRM1) is often highly expressed in GBM, which may portend a poor prognosis. Here, we determine the efficacy of novel selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) specific to XPO1 in preclinical models of GBM. METHODS: Seven patient-derived GBM lines were treated with 3 SINE compounds (KPT-251, KPT-276, and Selinexor) in neurosphere culture conditions. KPT-276 and Selinexor were also evaluated in a murine orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of GBM. Cell cycle effects were assayed by flow cytometry in vitro and immunohistochemistry in vivo. Apoptosis was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and caspase 3/7 activity assays. RESULTS: Treatment of GBM neurosphere cultures with KPT-276, Selinexor, and KPT-251 revealed dose-responsive growth inhibition in all 7 GBM lines [range of half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), 6-354 nM]. In an orthotopic PDX model, treatment with KPT-276 and Selinexor demonstrated pharmacodynamic efficacy, significantly suppressed tumor growth, and prolonged animal survival. Cellular proliferation was not altered with SINE treatment. Instead, induction of apoptosis was apparent both in vitro and in vivo with SINE treatment, without overt evidence of neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SINE compounds show preclinical efficacy utilizing in vitro and in vivo models of GBM, with induction of apoptosis as the mechanism of action. Selinexor is now in early clinical trials in solid and hematological malignancies. Based on these preclinical data and excellent brain penetration, we have initiated clinical trials of Selinexor in patients with relapsed GBM.
BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma (GBM) is poorly responsive to current chemotherapy. The nuclear transporter exportin 1 (XPO1, CRM1) is often highly expressed in GBM, which may portend a poor prognosis. Here, we determine the efficacy of novel selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) specific to XPO1 in preclinical models of GBM. METHODS: Seven patient-derived GBM lines were treated with 3 SINE compounds (KPT-251, KPT-276, and Selinexor) in neurosphere culture conditions. KPT-276 and Selinexor were also evaluated in a murine orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of GBM. Cell cycle effects were assayed by flow cytometry in vitro and immunohistochemistry in vivo. Apoptosis was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and caspase 3/7 activity assays. RESULTS: Treatment of GBM neurosphere cultures with KPT-276, Selinexor, and KPT-251 revealed dose-responsive growth inhibition in all 7 GBM lines [range of half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), 6-354 nM]. In an orthotopic PDX model, treatment with KPT-276 and Selinexor demonstrated pharmacodynamic efficacy, significantly suppressed tumor growth, and prolonged animal survival. Cellular proliferation was not altered with SINE treatment. Instead, induction of apoptosis was apparent both in vitro and in vivo with SINE treatment, without overt evidence of neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SINE compounds show preclinical efficacy utilizing in vitro and in vivo models of GBM, with induction of apoptosis as the mechanism of action. Selinexor is now in early clinical trials in solid and hematological malignancies. Based on these preclinical data and excellent brain penetration, we have initiated clinical trials of Selinexor in patients with relapsed GBM.
Authors: Sarah C Mutka; Wen Qing Yang; Steven D Dong; Shannon L Ward; Darren A Craig; Pieter B M W M Timmermans; Sumati Murli Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Zhi Sheng; Li Li; Lihua J Zhu; Thomas W Smith; Andrea Demers; Alonzo H Ross; Richard P Moser; Michael R Green Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-05-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: John Wong; Elwood Armour; Peter Kazanzides; Iulian Iordachita; Erik Tryggestad; Hua Deng; Mohammad Matinfar; Christopher Kennedy; Zejian Liu; Timothy Chan; Owen Gray; Frank Verhaegen; Todd McNutt; Eric Ford; Theodore L DeWeese Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dominik Sturm; Sebastian Bender; David T W Jones; Peter Lichter; Jacques Grill; Oren Becher; Cynthia Hawkins; Jacek Majewski; Chris Jones; Joseph F Costello; Antonio Iavarone; Kenneth Aldape; Cameron W Brennan; Nada Jabado; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Albiruni R Abdul Razak; Morten Mau-Soerensen; Nashat Y Gabrail; John F Gerecitano; Anthony F Shields; Thaddeus J Unger; Jean R Saint-Martin; Robert Carlson; Yosef Landesman; Dilara McCauley; Tami Rashal; Ulrik Lassen; Richard Kim; Lee-Anne Stayner; Mansoor R Mirza; Michael Kauffman; Sharon Shacham; Amit Mahipal Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John A DeSisto; Patrick Flannery; Rakeb Lemma; Amrita Pathak; Shelby Mestnik; Natalie Philips; Natalie J Bales; Trinayan Kashyap; Erin Moroze; Sujatha Venkataraman; Andrew L Kung; Bruce D Carter; Yosef Landesman; Rajeev Vibhakar; Adam L Green Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Jennifer R Landes; Stephen A Moore; Brooke R Bartley; Hung Q Doan; Peter L Rady; Stephen K Tyring Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Thomas B Alexander; Norman J Lacayo; John K Choi; Raul C Ribeiro; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew B Lassman; Patrick Y Wen; Martin J van den Bent; Scott R Plotkin; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Adam L Green; Kai Li; Christopher J Walker; Hua Chang; Sharon Tamir; Leah Henegar; Yao Shen; Mariano J Alvarez; Andrea Califano; Yosef Landesman; Michael G Kauffman; Sharon Shacham; Morten Mau-Sørensen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 12.531