Literature DB >> 25361369

The Masquelet procedure gone awry.

Mathieu Assal, Richard Stern.   

Abstract

The Masquelet technique was first performed in 1986. It is a 2-stage procedure for healing of substantial bone defects, with or without the presence of infection. In the former situation, a thorough debridement of the infected site is necessary to achieve a clean cavity. A cement block is fashioned to fit into the entire defect to act as a spacer that maintains the space for grafting and reconstruction and induces a synovial-like membrane. The induced membrane avoids resorption of the bone graft and secretes growth factors, including vascular and osteoinductive factors, to promote revascularization of the graft. The membrane has an inner part that is a synovial-like epithelium and an outer part composed of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and collagen. It is richly vascularized. After a period of 6 to 8 weeks, the spacer is removed by incising the induced membrane that has formed. Copious bone graft, usually autologous and obtained from the iliac crest or by other means, is placed into the defect that is now lined by the induced membrane. The membrane is closed over the graft. This article describes a young patient who started on the correct path for a Masquelet procedure only to have it turn in the wrong direction. However, the problem was not recognized until 8 years after the initial injury. The situation was corrected by performing the final stage of the procedure as it was originally described. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25361369     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20141023-93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  7 in total

1.  Induced membrane maintains its osteogenic properties even when the second stage of Masquelet's technique is performed later.

Authors:  Florelle Gindraux; François Loisel; Michael Bourgeois; Karim Oudina; Martine Melin; Benoit de Billy; Pauline Sergent; Gregoire Leclerc; Hervé Petite; Frederic Auber; Laurent Obert; Isabelle Pluvy
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  [Reconstruction of osseous defects using the Masquelet technique].

Authors:  F Saxer; H Eckardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Bone defect treatment: does the type and properties of the spacer affect the induction of Masquelet membrane? Evidence today.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Vassilis P Giannoudis; Stephan Sehmisch; Animesh Jha; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Induced membrane technique for large bone defects: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Heng Sun; Wen-Wen Tsai; Sz-Iuan Shiu; Chih-Hui Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Is the bioactivity of induced membranes time dependent?

Authors:  Jan Gessmann; Thomas Rosteius; Hinnerk Baecker; Kavitha Sivalingam; Elvira Peter; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Manfred Köller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Masquelet's induced membrane technique: Review of current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Andrea I Alford; Daemeon Nicolaou; Mark Hake; Sarah McBride-Gagyi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Bridging hard callus at 48 days in an open femoral shaft fracture with segmental defect treated with a first-stage Masquelet technique: I wasn't expecting that.

Authors:  Andrew James Hotchen; Lynne V Barr; Matija Krkovic
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2017-11-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.