Literature DB >> 23455954

Risk factors for survival of 106 surgically treated patients with symptomatic spinal epidural metastases.

L Bollen1, G C W de Ruiter, W Pondaag, M P Arts, M Fiocco, T J T Hazen, W C Peul, P D S Dijkstra.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of risk factors for survival in patients surgically treated for symptomatic spinal epidural metastases (SEM).
METHODS: One hundred and six patients who were surgically treated for symptomatic SEM in a 10-year period in two cooperatively working hospitals were retrospectively studied for nine risk factors: age, gender, site of the primary tumor, location of the symptomatic spinal metastasis, functional and neurologic status, the presence of visceral metastases and the presence of other spinal and extraspinal bone metastases. Analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate log-rank tests and Cox-regression models.
RESULTS: Overall median survival was 10.7 months (0.2-107.5 months). Overall 30-day complication rate was 33 %. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis showed that fast growing primary tumors (HR 3.1, 95 % CI 1.6-6.2, p = 0.001), the presence of visceral metastases (HR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.0-2.9, p = 0.033) and a low performance status (HR 2.7, 95 % CI 1.1-6.6, p = 0.025) negatively influenced the survival.
CONCLUSION: Primary tumor type, presence of visceral metastases and performance status are significant predictors for survival after surgery for symptomatic SEM and should be evaluated before deciding on the extent of treatment. More accurate prediction models are needed to select the best treatment option for the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23455954      PMCID: PMC3676552          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2726-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Assessment of prognostic factors in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) from solid tumor after surgery plus radiotherapy: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Flavio Tancioni; Piera Navarria; Federico Pessina; Luca Attuati; Pietro Mancosu; Marco Alloisio; Marta Scorsetti; Armando Santoro; Riccardo Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yvette M van der Linden; Sander P D S Dijkstra; Ernest J A Vonk; Corrie A M Marijnen; Jan Willem H Leer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I.

Authors:  H L Frankel; D O Hancock; G Hyslop; J Melzak; L S Michaelis; G H Ungar; J D Vernon; J J Walsh
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1969-11

4.  Surgery improves pain, function and quality of life in patients with spinal metastases: a prospective study on 118 patients.

Authors:  Gerald M Y Quan; Jean-Marc Vital; Nicholas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Jean Palussière; Abou Diallo; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.

Authors:  C C Schag; R L Heinrich; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review.

Authors:  E Chow; T Harth; G Hruby; J Finkelstein; J Wu; C Danjoux
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Scoring system for the preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Y Tokuhashi; H Matsuzaki; S Toriyama; H Kawano; S Ohsaka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients.

Authors:  H C Bauer; R Wedin
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-04

10.  Outcome after surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression in 54 patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sead Crnalic; Christer Hildingsson; Pernilla Wikström; Anders Bergh; Richard Löfvenberg; Anders Widmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  10 in total

1.  Molecular phenotype is associated with survival in breast cancer patients with spinal bone metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; C Wibmer; M Wang; Y M van der Linden; A Leithner; C E Bünger; A B Jensen; M Fiocco; G Bratschitsch; W Pondaag; J V M G Bovée; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1,043 patients.

Authors:  Laurens Bollen; Yvette M van der Linden; Willem Pondaag; Marta Fiocco; Bas P M Pattynama; Corrie A M Marijnen; Rob G H H Nelissen; Wilco C Peul; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Treatment and outcomes of 28 patients with spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Chenglong Zhao; Shaohui He; Tianqi Fan; Wei Xu; Cheng Yang; Tielong Liu; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Functional and survival outcomes in patients undergoing surgical treatment for metastatic disease of the spine.

Authors:  Vignesh K Alamanda; Myra M Robinson; Jeffrey S Kneisl; Joshua C Patt
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

Review 5.  Symptomatic spinal metastasis: A systematic literature review of the preoperative prognostic factors for survival, neurological, functional and quality of life in surgically treated patients and methodological recommendations for prognostic studies.

Authors:  Anick Nater; Allan R Martin; Arjun Sahgal; David Choi; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Morphometrics predicts overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma spine metastasis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hesham Mostafa Zakaria; Erinma Elibe; Mohamed Macki; Richard Smith; David Boyce-Fappiano; Ian Lee; Brent Griffith; Farzan Siddiqui; Victor Chang
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-08-22

7.  Hypoalbuminemia as an Independent Risk Factor for Perioperative Complications Following Surgical Decompression of Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Awais K Hussain; Zoe B Cheung; Khushdeep S Vig; Kevin Phan; Mauricio C Lima; Jun S Kim; John Di Capua; Deepak A Kaji; Varun Arvind; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-08-26

8.  Impact of Obesity on Surgical Outcomes Following Laminectomy for Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Zoe B Cheung; Khushdeep S Vig; Samuel J W White; Mauricio C Lima; Awais K Hussain; Kevin Phan; Jun S Kim; John M Caridi; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-06-13

9.  Prevalence and risk factors of postoperative delirium after spinal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Gao; Hui-Juan Ma; Ying-Jia Li; Ci Yin; Zheng Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Age Stratification of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Excisional Laminectomy for Extradural Cervical and Thoracic Tumors.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Zoe B Cheung; Khushdeep S Vig; Awais K Hussain; Mauricio C Lima; Jun S Kim; John Di Capua; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-12-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.