Literature DB >> 25356198

A dataset comprising 141 magnetic resonance imaging scans of 98 extant sea urchin species.

Alexander Ziegler1, Cornelius Faber2, Susanne Mueller3, Nina Nagelmann2, Leif Schröder4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apart from its application in human diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also be used to study the internal anatomy of zoological specimens. As a non-invasive imaging technique, MRI has several advantages, such as rapid data acquisition, output of true three-dimensional imagery, and provision of digital data right from the onset of a study. Of particular importance for comparative zoological studies is the capacity of MRI to conduct high-throughput analyses of multiple specimens. In this study, MRI was applied to systematically document the internal anatomy of 98 representative species of sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea).
FINDINGS: The dataset includes raw and derived image data from 141 MRI scans. Most of the whole sea urchin specimens analyzed were obtained from museum collections. The attained scan resolutions permit differentiation of various internal organs, including the digestive tract, reproductive system, coelomic compartments, and lantern musculature. All data deposited in the GigaDB repository can be accessed using open source software. Potential uses of the dataset include interactive exploration of sea urchin anatomy, morphometric and volumetric analyses of internal organs observed in their natural context, as well as correlation of hard and soft tissue structures.
CONCLUSIONS: The dataset covers a broad taxonomical and morphological spectrum of the Echinoidea, focusing on 'regular' sea urchin taxa. The deposited files significantly expand the amount of morphological data on echinoids that are electronically available. The approach chosen here can be extended to various other vertebrate and invertebrate taxa. We argue that publicly available digital anatomical and morphological data gathered during experiments involving non-invasive imaging techniques constitute one of the prerequisites for future large-scale genotype-phenotype correlations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Echinodermata; Echinoidea; Evolution; MRI; Morphology; Morphomics; Repository; Soft tissue; Systematics

Year:  2014        PMID: 25356198      PMCID: PMC4212584          DOI: 10.1186/2047-217X-3-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Data description

Purpose of data acquisition

Despite the fact that sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) have served as model organisms in various biological disciplines for over a century and a half [1], the internal anatomy of this taxon had never been systematically analyzed on a large scale. Until recently, such broad inferences would invariably have required the undesirable dissection of valuable material, including museum type specimens. However, non-invasive scanning techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) now permit studying echinoid internal anatomy without the need for dissection [2]. In addition to its suitability for studies on sea urchins, MRI can also be used to visualize the soft tissue anatomy of other invertebrate as well as vertebrate taxa [3]. Most importantly, MRI experiments result in digital data suitable for rapid online dissemination [4]. In recent years, morphology has fallen behind data gathering, deposition and transparency practices considered as standard in other biological disciplines, such as proteomics or genomics [5]. Apart from its multiple potential applications, the dataset presented here is therefore also intended to serve as a catalyst for new approaches aimed at the large-scale deposition of digital morphological and anatomical information [6].

Scanned specimens

The deposited dataset comprises 141 MRI scans from 98 representative extant sea urchin species. The scanned specimens were whole sub-adult or adult individuals ranging in diameter or length from 5–43 mm. Most of the specimens were obtained from museum collections, where they are preserved in ethanol for long-term storage. Some of the specimens were collected and fixed more than 135 years ago, while others were collected a few months prior to scanning. Additional file 1 gives a taxonomical list of the species analyzed and provides specimen data (Table S1).

Data acquisition and processing

Basic information on the protocols used for specimen preparation, contrasting, and scanning are provided in Additional file 1, complemented by a description of each file type produced during the MRI experiments (Table S2). More specific information on sample preparation and equipment or the application of contrast agents and different scanning protocols has been published elsewhere [7]. The detailed acquisition and reconstruction parameters for each scan can be found in the MRI metadata files deposited online together with the raw and derived image data [8]. Forty-four two-dimensional (2D) and 97 three-dimensional (3D) scans were obtained using various high-field MRI scanners. Table 1 provides information on the scanning systems employed in this study. 2D MRI scans have a reduced voxel resolution in the third dimension (e.g., 50 × 50 × 200 μm), while 3D MRI scans are characterized by an isotropic voxel resolution (e.g., 40 × 40 × 40 μm). In various instances, specimens were scanned twice using the same scanning protocol, but once before and once after the application of a contrast agent (Magnevist, Bayer HealthCare, Leverkusen, Germany). The folders containing scans of contrasted specimens have been specifically labeled using the word 'Magnevist'.
Table 1

Overview of high-field MRI scanners (Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) employed in this study

ModelLocationMagnetResonance frequencyGradient systemGradient strengthResonator
7 T PharmaScan 70/16
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Superconducting, 160 mm horizontal bore
1H, 300 MHz
Actively shielded, inner Ø 90 mm
300 mT/m
1H, linear volume resonator, inner Ø 38 mm
7 T BioSpec 70/20
Universität Würzburg, Germany
Superconducting, 200 mm horizontal bore
1H, 300 MHz
Actively shielded, inner Ø 90 mm
700 mT/m
1H, quadrature volume resonator, inner Ø 72 mm
9.4 T BioSpec 94/20
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany
Superconducting, 200 mm horizontal bore
1H, 400 MHz
Actively shielded, inner Ø 60 and 120 mm
720 mT/m and 1 T/m
1H, CryoProbe transmit-receive surface resonator and quadrature volume resonator, inner Ø 35 and 72 mm
9.4 T AVANCE 400WB
Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
Superconducting, 89 mm vertical bore
1H, 400 MHz
Actively shielded, inner Ø 40 mm
1 T/m
1H, linear volume resonator, inner Ø 30 mm
17.6 T AVANCE 750WBUniverstität Würzburg, GermanySuperconducting, 89 mm vertical bore1H, 750 MHzActively shielded, inner Ø 40 mm1 T/m1H, linear volume resonator, inner Ø 5 and 20 mm
Overview of high-field MRI scanners (Bruker BioSpin MRI GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) employed in this study For each scan, one image stack in tagged image file format (TIFF, .tif) was created based on the standard Bruker MRI 2dseq raw image file using the software ImageJ [9]. To facilitate a rapid recognition of internal structures, TIFF stacks based on 3D scans were rotated to a standardized orientation along the oral-aboral axis of the animal using the tool TransformJ Rotate, which is part of the ImageJ plugin TransformJ [10]. In addition, some of the TIFF stacks were reduced in their pixel dimensions by removing uninformative parts using the ‘Image:Crop’ command in ImageJ.

Data quality

The suitability of a given specimen for MRI was ascertained through visual inspection of the MRI scout images and the low-resolution scans performed prior to scanning at high resolutions [7]. The achieved 2D and 3D scan resolutions constitute the current state-of-the-art in high-field MRI at the given fields of view and are largely comparable to results derived from dissections carried out under direct observation through a stereomicroscope [2]. The quality of a given scan depended on various factors, some of which were outside our control, such as specimen health prior to fixation, the fixation itself, or the quality of the long-term storage. Although the 141 deposited scans constitute a selection of those with the best quality, several scans still show a significant presence of artifacts. These artifacts are primarily related to the biology of the animal, in particular the presence of para- or ferromagnetic substances contained within the digestive tract [7]. Additional file 1 provides brief information on artifacts encountered in each scan.

Potential uses

The methodological approach employed here allows conducting high-throughput analyses of hundreds or even thousands of zoological specimens [7]. Potential uses of the present dataset include morphometric or volumetric analyses of internal organs [11] and interactive exploration of sea urchin anatomy using digital 2D and 3D visualization tools [12]. For example, MRI scans with an isotropic voxel resolution are particularly suitable for 3D modeling [13]. In addition, MRI stacks can be aligned with image data derived from complementary non-invasive imaging techniques that permit visualizing mineralized structures, in particular micro-computed tomography [14]. Furthermore, the relatively quick 2D MRI scanning protocols used for some of the deposited scans could find application in the in vivo study of sea urchins whose gonads are intended for human consumption.

Relevance of the dataset

The dataset presented here constitutes a representative sample of sea urchin structural diversity. No significant differences in scanning results were observed when employing freshly fixed or museum specimens [2], while the application of a contrast agent resulted in an improved signal-to-noise ratio, as well as a reduction of the negative effects of artifacts [7]. The MRI data allow identification of numerous internal organs, including lantern muscles [15], axial complex [16], gastric caecum [17], or intestinal caecum [18]. These studies demonstrate that initial difficulties with regard to the interpretation of MRI data do not render the scanning approach itself unsuitable [19]. Due to the digital nature of data based on non-invasive imaging techniques, the rapid online dissemination of morphological and anatomical information has finally become possible. This development is bound to lead to an unprecedented level of data availability and transparency in zoomorphology and paleontology, ultimately resulting in more widespread data mining in these two scientific fields [20]. Furthermore, the enforced deposition of digital morphological data as a prerequisite for publication will pave the way for the correlation of geno- and phenotype on a large scale [6]. We believe that digital datasets and enforced data deposition constitute essential components for the success of the expanding field of morphomics, which aims to complement the already established ‘omics’ disciplines [21].

Availability of supporting data

The dataset supporting the results of this study is available in the GigaScience repository, GigaDB [8]. Additional file 1 provides specimen data, detailed information on data availability and requirements, as well as information on the preparation, contrasting and scanning of sea urchin specimens. The authors ask that any publication arising from the use of the deposited data acknowledges the source of the dataset. See [22] for a discussion of copyright licenses and waiver agreements used in open access research.

Abbreviations

2D: Two-dimensional; 3D: Three-dimensional; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; TIFF: Tagged image file format.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AZ designed the study, drafted the manuscript, and gathered, analyzed and curated data. CF, SM, NN, and LS designed the experiments and gathered data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file 1

Supplementary specimen information and tables. Table S1. Overview of the dataset comprising 141 MRI scans of 98 extant sea urchin species. Table S2. Overview of Bruker MRI file types. Click here for file
  11 in total

1.  Analysis of freshly fixed and museum invertebrate specimens using high-resolution, high-throughput MRI.

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Susanne Mueller
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has failed to distinguish between smaller gut regions and larger haemal sinuses in sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea).

Authors:  Nicholas D Holland; Michael T Ghiselin
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 7.431

3.  The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

Authors:  Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock; Eric H Davidson; R Andrew Cameron; Richard A Gibbs; Robert C Angerer; Lynne M Angerer; Maria Ina Arnone; David R Burgess; Robert D Burke; James A Coffman; Michael Dean; Maurice R Elphick; Charles A Ettensohn; Kathy R Foltz; Amro Hamdoun; Richard O Hynes; William H Klein; William Marzluff; David R McClay; Robert L Morris; Arcady Mushegian; Jonathan P Rast; L Courtney Smith; Michael C Thorndyke; Victor D Vacquier; Gary M Wessel; Greg Wray; Lan Zhang; Christine G Elsik; Olga Ermolaeva; Wratko Hlavina; Gretchen Hofmann; Paul Kitts; Melissa J Landrum; Aaron J Mackey; Donna Maglott; Georgia Panopoulou; Albert J Poustka; Kim Pruitt; Victor Sapojnikov; Xingzhi Song; Alexandre Souvorov; Victor Solovyev; Zheng Wei; Charles A Whittaker; Kim Worley; K James Durbin; Yufeng Shen; Olivier Fedrigo; David Garfield; Ralph Haygood; Alexander Primus; Rahul Satija; Tonya Severson; Manuel L Gonzalez-Garay; Andrew R Jackson; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Mark Tong; Christopher E Killian; Brian T Livingston; Fred H Wilt; Nikki Adams; Robert Bellé; Seth Carbonneau; Rocky Cheung; Patrick Cormier; Bertrand Cosson; Jenifer Croce; Antonio Fernandez-Guerra; Anne-Marie Genevière; Manisha Goel; Hemant Kelkar; Julia Morales; Odile Mulner-Lorillon; Anthony J Robertson; Jared V Goldstone; Bryan Cole; David Epel; Bert Gold; Mark E Hahn; Meredith Howard-Ashby; Mark Scally; John J Stegeman; Erin L Allgood; Jonah Cool; Kyle M Judkins; Shawn S McCafferty; Ashlan M Musante; Robert A Obar; Amanda P Rawson; Blair J Rossetti; Ian R Gibbons; Matthew P Hoffman; Andrew Leone; Sorin Istrail; Stefan C Materna; Manoj P Samanta; Viktor Stolc; Waraporn Tongprasit; Qiang Tu; Karl-Frederik Bergeron; Bruce P Brandhorst; James Whittle; Kevin Berney; David J Bottjer; Cristina Calestani; Kevin Peterson; Elly Chow; Qiu Autumn Yuan; Eran Elhaik; Dan Graur; Justin T Reese; Ian Bosdet; Shin Heesun; Marco A Marra; Jacqueline Schein; Michele K Anderson; Virginia Brockton; Katherine M Buckley; Avis H Cohen; Sebastian D Fugmann; Taku Hibino; Mariano Loza-Coll; Audrey J Majeske; Cynthia Messier; Sham V Nair; Zeev Pancer; David P Terwilliger; Cavit Agca; Enrique Arboleda; Nansheng Chen; Allison M Churcher; F Hallböök; Glen W Humphrey; Mohammed M Idris; Takae Kiyama; Shuguang Liang; Dan Mellott; Xiuqian Mu; Greg Murray; Robert P Olinski; Florian Raible; Matthew Rowe; John S Taylor; Kristin Tessmar-Raible; D Wang; Karen H Wilson; Shunsuke Yaguchi; Terry Gaasterland; Blanca E Galindo; Herath J Gunaratne; Celina Juliano; Masashi Kinukawa; Gary W Moy; Anna T Neill; Mamoru Nomura; Michael Raisch; Anna Reade; Michelle M Roux; Jia L Song; Yi-Hsien Su; Ian K Townley; Ekaterina Voronina; Julian L Wong; Gabriele Amore; Margherita Branno; Euan R Brown; Vincenzo Cavalieri; Véronique Duboc; Louise Duloquin; Constantin Flytzanis; Christian Gache; François Lapraz; Thierry Lepage; Annamaria Locascio; Pedro Martinez; Giorgio Matassi; Valeria Matranga; Ryan Range; Francesca Rizzo; Eric Röttinger; Wendy Beane; Cynthia Bradham; Christine Byrum; Tom Glenn; Sofia Hussain; Gerard Manning; Esther Miranda; Rebecca Thomason; Katherine Walton; Athula Wikramanayke; Shu-Yu Wu; Ronghui Xu; C Titus Brown; Lili Chen; Rachel F Gray; Pei Yun Lee; Jongmin Nam; Paola Oliveri; Joel Smith; Donna Muzny; Stephanie Bell; Joseph Chacko; Andrew Cree; Stacey Curry; Clay Davis; Huyen Dinh; Shannon Dugan-Rocha; Jerry Fowler; Rachel Gill; Cerrissa Hamilton; Judith Hernandez; Sandra Hines; Jennifer Hume; Laronda Jackson; Angela Jolivet; Christie Kovar; Sandra Lee; Lora Lewis; George Miner; Margaret Morgan; Lynne V Nazareth; Geoffrey Okwuonu; David Parker; Ling-Ling Pu; Rachel Thorn; Rita Wright
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The Digital Fish Library: using MRI to digitize, database, and document the morphological diversity of fish.

Authors:  Rachel M Berquist; Kristen M Gledhill; Matthew W Peterson; Allyson H Doan; Gregory T Baxter; Kara E Yopak; Ning Kang; H J Walker; Philip A Hastings; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Origin and evolutionary plasticity of the gastric caecum in sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea).

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Rich Mooi; Gauthier Rolet; Chantal De Ridder
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Opportunities and challenges for digital morphology.

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Malte Ogurreck; Thomas Steinke; Felix Beckmann; Steffen Prohaska; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Evolution of a novel muscle design in sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea).

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Leif Schröder; Malte Ogurreck; Cornelius Faber; Thomas Stach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparative morphology of the axial complex and interdependence of internal organ systems in sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea).

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Cornelius Faber; Thomas Bartolomaeus
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journals.

Authors:  Iain Hrynaszkiewicz; Matthew J Cockerill
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-09-07

10.  Systematic comparison and reconstruction of sea urchin (Echinoidea) internal anatomy: a novel approach using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Cornelius Faber; Susanne Mueller; Thomas Bartolomaeus
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative Classification of Cerebellar Foliation in Cartilaginous Fishes (Class: Chondrichthyes) Using Three-Dimensional Shape Analysis and Its Implications for Evolutionary Biology.

Authors:  Kara E Yopak; Vitaly L Galinsky; Rachel M Berquist; Lawrence R Frank
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Body wall structure in the starfish Asterias rubens.

Authors:  Liisa M Blowes; Michaela Egertová; Yankai Liu; Graham R Davis; Nick J Terrill; Himadri S Gupta; Maurice R Elphick
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Schizasterid Heart Urchins Host Microorganisms in a Digestive Symbiosis of Mesozoic Origin.

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Ariel M Gilligan; Jesse G Dillon; Bruno Pernet
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.