Literature DB >> 25352131

Comparing and combining biomarkers as principal surrogates for time-to-event clinical endpoints.

Erin E Gabriel1, Michael C Sachs, Peter B Gilbert.   

Abstract

Principal surrogate endpoints are useful as targets for phase I and II trials. In many recent trials, multiple post-randomization biomarkers are measured. However, few statistical methods exist for comparison of or combination of biomarkers as principal surrogates, and none of these methods to our knowledge utilize time-to-event clinical endpoint information. We propose a Weibull model extension of the semi-parametric estimated maximum likelihood method that allows for the inclusion of multiple biomarkers in the same risk model as multivariate candidate principal surrogates. We propose several methods for comparing candidate principal surrogates and evaluating multivariate principal surrogates. These include the time-dependent and surrogate-dependent true and false positive fraction, the time-dependent and the integrated standardized total gain, and the cumulative distribution function of the risk difference. We illustrate the operating characteristics of our proposed methods in simulations and outline how these statistics can be used to evaluate and compare candidate principal surrogates. We use these methods to investigate candidate surrogates in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy measures; causal inference; multivariate principal stratification; surrogate endpoint evaluation; survival analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25352131      PMCID: PMC4801510          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

1.  Principal stratification in causal inference.

Authors:  Constantine E Frangakis; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Intensive diabetes therapy and glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ian H de Boer; Wanjie Sun; Patricia A Cleary; John M Lachin; Mark E Molitch; Michael W Steffes; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Comparing biomarkers as principal surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Evaluating principal surrogate endpoints with time-to-event data accounting for time-varying treatment efficacy.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  A framework for assessing immunological correlates of protection in vaccine trials.

Authors:  Li Qin; Peter B Gilbert; Lawrence Corey; M Juliana McElrath; Steven G Self
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Principal stratification--uses and limitations.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  A Bayesian approach to improved estimation of causal effect predictiveness for a principal surrogate endpoint.

Authors:  Corwin M Zigler; Thomas R Belin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Assessing treatment-selection markers using a potential outcomes framework.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert; Holly Janes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The hazards of hazard ratios.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Statistical identifiability and the surrogate endpoint problem, with application to vaccine trials.

Authors:  Julian Wolfson; Peter Gilbert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  12 in total

1.  Augmented trial designs for evaluation of principal surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Dean Follmann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Evaluating surrogate marker information using censored data.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Predicting Overall Vaccine Efficacy in a New Setting by Re-Calibrating Baseline Covariate and Intermediate Response Endpoint Effect Modifiers of Type-Specific Vaccine Efficacy.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ying Huang
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2016-01-23

4.  Inference on treatment effect modification by biomarker response in a three-phase sampling design.

Authors:  Michal Juraska; Ying Huang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Evaluation and comparison of predictive individual-level general surrogates.

Authors:  Erin E Gabriel; Michael C Sachs; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  An Introduction to Principal Surrogate Evaluation with the pseval Package.

Authors:  Michael C Sachs; Erin E Gabriel
Journal:  R J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Assessing the value of a censored surrogate outcome.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Post-randomization Biomarker Effect Modification Analysis in an HIV Vaccine Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Bryan S Blette; Bryan E Shepherd; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2020-07-25

Review 9.  Modeling HIV vaccine trials of the future.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ying Huang; Holly E Janes
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Evaluating multiple surrogate markers with censored data.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.