Literature DB >> 25350281

A transcriptome analysis suggests apoptosis-related signaling pathways in hemocytes of Spodoptera litura after parasitization by Microplitis bicoloratus.

Ming Li1, Zunyu Pang1, Wei Xiao1, Xinyi Liu1, Yan Zhang1, Dongshuai Yu1, Minjun Yang2, Yang Yang1, Jiansheng Hu1, Kaijun Luo1.   

Abstract

Microplitis bicoloratus parasitism induction of apoptotic DNA fragmentation of host Spodoptera litura hemocytes has been reported. However, how M. bicoloratus parasitism regulates the host signaling pathways to induce DNA fragmentation during apoptosis remains unclear. To address this question, we performed a new RNAseq-based comparative analysis of the hemocytes transcriptomes of non-parasitized and parasitized S. litura. We were able to assemble a total of more than 11.63 Gbp sequence, to yield 20,571 unigenes. At least six main protein families encoded by M. bicoloratus bracovirus are expressed in the parasitized host hemocytes: Ankyrin-repeat, Ben domain, C-type lectin, Egf-like and Mucin-like, protein tyrosine phosphatase. The analysis indicated that during DNA fragmentation and cell death, 299 genes were up-regulated and 2,441 genes were down-regulated. Data on five signaling pathways related with cell death, the gap junctions, Ca2+, PI3K/Akt, NF-κB, ATM/p53 revealed that CypD, which is involved in forming a Permeability Transition Pore Complex (PTPC) to alter mitochondrial membrane permeabilization (MMP), was dramatically up-regulated. The qRT-PCR also provided that the key genes for cell survival were down-regulated under M. bicoloratus parasitism, including those encoding Inx1, Inx2 and Inx3 of the gap junction signaling pathway, p110 subunit of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, and the p50 and p65 subunit of the NF-κB signaling pathway. These findings suggest that M. bicoloratus parasitism may regulate host mitochondria to trigger internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. This study will facilitate the identification of immunosuppression-related genes and also improves our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying polydnavirus-parasitoid-host interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25350281      PMCID: PMC4211697          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Polydnaviruses (PDVs) have a very special life cycle. Unlike many viruses, they are not always obligate intracellular parasites, replicating inside living host cells to produce virions that can transfer genes to other cells [1]–[4]. Rather, PDVs are obligate symbionts of many endoparasitic wasps in the families Braconidae (carrying bracovirus) and Ichneumonidae (carrying ichnovirus). Both viruses have similar life cycles, wherein viral DNAs are integrated into a wasp’s genome via Wasp Integration/Excision Motif (WIM) [5] and transmitted vertically to the wasp’s offspring in a proviral form. Viruses replicate in the nucleus of the calyx cell in wasp ovaries. Mature virions are stored in the lumen of the calyx and oviduct, and the suspension of virus and protein is called calyx fluid. When a female wasp finds a host, she injects calyx fluid, venom produced by the venom gland and one or more eggs into the hemocoel of the host caterpillar. Virions infect host cells and discharge their circular dsDNA into the host nuclei, which then rapidly integrates into the host genome via the Host Integration Motif (HIM) [6]. Virulence genes are then transcribed in host cell nuclei and the cytoplasm, resulting in expression of virulence proteins. During the development of the wasp’s offspring, the host hemocoel contains innate suppressive proteins from virus gene expression. In addition, specifically among the bracoviruses, the induction of host hemocyte apoptosis causes host immunosuppression [1], [3]. Apoptosis or programmed cell death (PCD), is common to all metazoan phyla, including insects. Braconidae-induced apoptosis, however, is specifically characterized by internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. Apoptotic DNA fragmentation involves a variety of elements, including AIF, EndoG and DFF40. Every element is regulated by different signaling pathways, defined as extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Extrinsic apoptosis pathway is triggered by the ligand-induced oligomerization of specific cell surface receptors, and this process induces the intracellular assembly of the death-inducing signaling complex for the activation of a caspase cascade initiated from caspase 8 that results in activation of caspase 3 and further cascade activation of DFF (cleavage of DFF45 releases DFF40 into the nucleus). DFF, a heterodimeric protein comprising 45 kDa and 40 kDa subunits termed ICAD/DFF45 and CAD/DFF40 [7]. The DFF complex is localized in the cellular cytoplasm, resulting in the triggering of extrinsic apoptotic stress, and activated caspase 3 cleaves DFF45 and dissociates DFF40. Caspase 7 and Granzyme B also can cleave DFF45 but with a lower efficiency than caspase 3 [8]. Activated DFF40 translocates into the nucleus. In the nucleus, the activation of DFF40 is enhanced by interaction with the chromosomal protein Histone H1 and it cleaves chromosomal DNA at internucleosomal sites into fragments of ∼200 bp. [9]–[11]. In contrast, the intrinsic pathway is also controlled by mitochondria, which collects and integrates pro- and anti-apoptotic signal stimuli from other organelles as well as from the extracellular microenvironment, such as DNA damage produced by Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM), endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and calcium overload. The intrinsic pathway can mediate caspase-independent and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Following intrinsic apoptotic stress triggering, EndoG is released from the mitochondrial intermembrane space and moves to the nucleus to produce nucleosomal DNA fragmentation, giving rise to 200∼5,000 bp sized fragments in a caspase-independent manner. AIF is another endonuclease released from the mitochondrial intermembrane space. It is a flavoprotein that produces DNA fragments up to 5,000 bp in size, and it also does not require caspase activation [12]. Releasing cytochrome c can also mediate cell death via activation of caspase 8, which triggers a caspase-dependent apoptosis. Numerous viruses are well known to modulate the mitochondrial apoptosis of infected host cells by altering Mitochondrial Membrane Permeabilization (MMP) in a direct and indirect manner with viral proteins. MMP regulation is performed via the Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel (VDAC) of the outer membrane (OM), the Adenine Nucleotide Translocase (ANT) of the inner membrane (IM), and cyclophilin D (CypD) of matrix proteins. Viral proapoptotic proteins are direct inducers of MMP. They include viral protein R (Vpr), which directly interacts with ANT and VDAC, thereby triggering MMP associated with mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) loss, mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) protein release, and caspase cascade activation. Viral proapoptotic proteins are also indirect MMP facilitators and promote apoptosis via both p53-dependent and -independent mechanisms [13]. The alteration of membrane permeability may release apoptotic-promoting factors from the mitochondria, such as AIF, EndoG, and Cyt c in the IMS, ultimately resulting in nuclear translocation. All of these signaling pathways involved in apoptotic DNA fragmentation are stimulated by intrinsic stress through the mitochondria via EndoG and AIF, in a process that is also called caspase-independent cell death, involving release of Cyt c, and extrinsic stress through caspase cascades via DFF40, which is also called caspase-dependent cell death [14]. After apoptotic stimulation, DFF40, EndoG and AIF migrate to the nucleus under the control of critical apoptosis-involved signaling pathways, including the gap junction signaling pathway, Ca2+ signaling pathway, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, NF-κB signaling pathway, and ATM/p53 signaling pathway. The gap junction signaling pathway induces apoptosis via regulation of the permeability of the plasma membrane resulting in alteration of intracellular and extracellular communication via transmission of small molecules, such as apoptotic signaling ATP. Gap junction proteins are the target proteins of activated caspase 3 [15] and also Ca2+. The Ca2+ signaling pathway is involved in apoptosis via altering the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane to release apoptosis-inducing factors to trigger apoptotic caspase-dependent and -independent pathways [13]. Apoptotic caspase-dependent signaling pathways include the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and NF-κB signaling pathway via regulation of caspase 3, and the apoptotic caspase-independent signaling pathways include regulation of the ATM/p53 signaling pathway by AIF expression [16]. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is crucial to many aspects of cell growth and survival, and its inhibition increases DNA fragmentation by the help of caspase 3 [17]. Baculoviruses inhibit cell apoptosis through activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [18]. Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB) transcription factors regulate the expression of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and many genes involved in cell survival, such as c-IAP1/2, XIAP, and Bcl-XL. All NF-κBs are homo- or heterodimers of Rel proteins, such as p50/p65 subunits. p53 plays an important role in suppressing tumorigenesis through inducing genomic stability via DNA repair, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. p53 promotes AIF activity and caspase-independent cell death by binding to a p53-responsive element (p53RE) in the AIF promoter, which ultimately results in efficient induction of large-scale DNA fragmentation (5 kb) [16]. In this paper, we aimed to clarify the mechanism of parasitism induction of host hemocyte apoptosis. To test the hypothesis that parasitism regulates host apoptotic signaling pathways to produce apoptotic DNA fragmentation involved in nuclear elements to the nucleus, resulting in internucleosomal DNA fragmentation from 5 kb to 200 bp, we sequenced the RNA from hemocytes of the Oriental Leafworm Moth Spodoptera litura parasitized by the wasp Microplitis bicoloratus and compared the transcriptome of hemocytes from non-parasitized controls. Using this transcription data, we obtained an overview on how M. bicoloratus parasitism regulates apoptosis signaling pathways during the immunosuppression and induced killing of host S. litura hemocytes. Furthermore, we proposed M. bicoloratus bracovirus products to regulate mitochondria permeability to trigger internucleosomal DNA fragmentation and block a set of key genes in the cell survival signaling pathway.

Results

Transcription sequencing and analysis

Gene expression profiling of S. litura hemocytes, both non-parasitized and parasitized, was achieved via sequencing with an Illumina Hiseq 2000 (Table S1). A million paired-end sequences (Table S2) from four samples, M1 and M2 from S. litura hemocytes parasitized by M. bicoloratus and samples S1 and S2 from non-parasitized S. litura hemocytes, were assembled into 3 different transcriptomes, M (M1+M2), S (S1+S2) and All (M1+M2+S1+S2), using Trinity. This gave a large number of EST cluster contigs: 15,208 (M), 15,206 (S) and 20,571 (All) (Table S3). A comparison of the transcriptome pattern of the average M and average S transcriptomes indicated that 299 consensus genes were up-regulated, and 2,441 genes were down-regulated, under M. bicoloratus parasitism in host hemocytes.

M. bicoloratus bracovirus genes transcribed in the hemocytes of parasitized host

It is well known that polydnaviruses manipulate host cell physiology [19]. Bracoviruses encode at least 20 gene families identified from 5 species of bracoviruses, Cotesia congregata bracovirus (CcBV) [20], Microplitis demolitor bracovirus (MdBV) [21], Glyptapanteles indiensis bracovirus (GiBV) [22], Glyptapanteles flavicoxis bracovirus (GfBV) [5], and Cotesia vestalis bracovirus (CvBV) [23]. In the present study, genes belonging to at least 6 conserved gene families were found to be expressed in the host hemocytes parasitized by M. bicoloratus including 1) Ankyrin-repeat, 2) BEN domain, 3) C-type lectin, 4) Epidermal growth factor-like (EGF-like), 5) Mucin-like, and 6) protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) (Table 1). Some of the proteins encoded by these genes are likely to be involved in regulating host cell death.
Table 1

Transcription of M. bicoloratus bracovirus genes during development of parasitoid M. bicoloratus in host hemocytes.

Protein FamilyProteinConsensus IDLengthNCBI_E_valueNCBI_IDFunctionSpecies
Ankyrin-repeatMbANK1comp576933_c0_seq12071.00E-14ref|YP_239402.1|viral ankyrin 1[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbANK1comp119151_c0_seq15583.00E-58ref|YP_239402.1|viral ankyrin 1[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbANK1comp26305_c0_seq15616.00E-40ref|YP_239402.1|viral ankyrin 1[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbANK2comp728608_c0_seq12256.00E-35ref|YP_239372.1|viral ankyrin 2[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbANK3comp18868_c0_seq15251.00E-83ref|YP_239406.1|viral ankyrin;[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
Ben domainMbBEN1comp20976_c0_seq110534.00E-54ref|YP_239364.1|hypothetical protein[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbBEN1comp20957_c0_seq115721.00E-115ref|YP_239364.1|hypothetical protein[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbBEN2comp9824_c0_seq120461.00E-166ref|YP_184800.1|CcBV_9.1[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbBEN3comp177162_c0_seq16182.00E-72ref|YP_184814.1|CcBV_12.2[Cotesia congregata bracovirus]
MbBEN4comp252441_c0_seq12372.00E-34gb|AEE09539.1|DUF-like 1 protein[Cotesia congregata bracovirus]
C-type lectinMbCLECT1comp19781_c0_seq16661.00E-34ref|YP_184818.1|CcBV_2–13.1[Cotesia congregata bracovirus]
MbCLECT2comp37160_c0_seq14741.00E-43gb|AEE09593.1|lectin[Cotesia vestalis bracovirus]
MbCLECT3comp375850_c0_seq13331.00E-31gb|AAS10157.1|lectin[Cotesia Plutellae Polydnavirus]
EGF-likeMbCRP1comp22262_c0_seq15618.00E-67gb|ABB922678.1|CRP1, egf 1.5[Microplitis bicoloratus bracovirus]
Mucin-likeMbGlc1.8comp118173_c0_seq11535.69E-14ref|YP_239419.1|Glc1.8[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbGlc1.8comp85587_c0_seq11261.46E-54ref|YP_239405.1|Glc1.8[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
PTP-likeMbPTP1comp360492_c0_seq14447.00E-72ref|YP_239404.1|PTP 1[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP1comp330407_c0_seq14177.00E-49ref|YP_239404.1|PTP 1[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP2comp207973_c0_seq13754.00E-64ref|YP_239382.1|PTP 2[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP2comp130820_c0_seq16181.00E-106ref|YP_239382.1|PTP 2[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP3comp556935_c0_seq13544.00E-59ref|YP_239383.1|PTP 3[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP4comp188579_c0_seq11773.00E-15ref|YP_239386.1|PTP 4[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP4comp498102_c0_seq13302.00E-33ref|YP_239386.1|PTP 4[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP4comp584871_c0_seq12019.00E-20ref|YP_239386.1|PTP 4[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP5comp279111_c0_seq12492.00E-11ref|YP_239381.1|PTP[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP5comp273967_c0_seq12857.00E-35ref|YP_239381.1|PTP[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP5comp456541_c0_seq13156.00E-38ref|YP_239381.1|PTP[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP5comp283025_c0_seq14201.00E-41ref|YP_239381.1|PTP[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTP6comp767898_c0_seq12648.00E-42ref|YP_239390.1|PTP[Microplitis demolitor bracovirus]
MbPTPcomp92610_c0_seq92525.90E-37gb|ACE75309.1|PTP[Glyptapanteles indiensis bracovirus]

Gap junction signaling pathway regulation by M. bicoloratus parasitism

Gap junction proteins form gap junction channels connecting cells for cell-cell communication and form hemichannels facilitating extracellular and intracellular communication including between ER and mitochondria to exchange small molecular, such as ATP and Ca2+, to trigger apoptosis [24]. In the insect circulating hemocytes, gap junction proteins form hemichannels to allow communication between the cell and environment. Under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) immunochallenge, hemichannel dye uptake decreases [25]. Typically, the decrease of the transcription level of hemichannel components and the decrease in opening of hemichannels on the cell surface result in the decrease of dye uptake. Gap junction proteins, Spli-Inx2 and Inx3, have been characterized and functioned [26] and in this study, Spli-inx1 and inx4 also were detected from hemocytes (Fig. S1 and Table S4). Comparisons with S and M transcriptome data indicated that all 26 elements of the gap junction signaling pathway existed in the hemocytes. During immune challenge by M. bicoloratus parasitization, 2 genes (Spli-GNAS, ADCY5) were not expressed in the parasitized host hemocytes. To determine the differential expression of genes, all transcriptome were assembled into a combined pool, and S1, S2, M1, and M2 were mapped using this pool to obtain reads and the RPM values of S and M. Furthermore, the analysis obtained the fold change and p-value between parasitized and non-parasitized. These analyses indicated that 12 genes (ADCY8, CPKC, GNAS, INX1, INX2, INX3, INX4, ITPR1, PKA, PLCB, PRKG, and TUBA) were down-regulated (Table 2). The qRT-PCR results indicate that the parasitization down-regulated 3 key molecules, Inx1, Inx2, Inx3, on the cell membrane, not Inx4 (Fig. 1). These molecules are involved in forming hemichannels and gap junctions, suggesting that there might be disruptions of intracellular between ER, mitochondria and extracellular molecular exchanges.
Table 2

The differential expression of genes regulated by M. bicoloratus bracovirus in the host gap junction signaling pathway.

M/S
A_IDFunctionread_MRPKM_Mread_SRPKM_Slog2(Fold_change)normalizedp-valueResultS_IDM-ID
comp95316_c0_seq3adenylate cyclase 84141.538851011536520.66052119−3.7469511840downcomp59135_c1_seq10comp18779_c0_seq1
comp96543_c0_seq4classical proteinkinase C15026.301173776374016.25542916−1.3672291434.6108E-232downcomp30329_c0_seq1comp20807_c0_seq1
comp97909_c0_seq6guanine nucleotide-bindingprotein G(s) subunitalpha410.6223588144306.762398457−3.4417165313.85048E-83downcomp59076_c0_seq5/
comp88846_c0_seq1gap junction6283.26015491516238.73E+00−1.4209022212.19E-107downcomp57755_c2_seq1comp19421_c1_seq1
comp65035_c0_seq1gap junction180816.23951848111251.04E+02−2.6724144390.00E+00downcomp45671_c0_seq1comp10397_c0_seq1
comp99381_c0_seq1gap junction399422.2593213236919213.1714802−3.2595329240downcomp59804_c0_seq1comp30941_c0_seq1
comp121018_c0_seq1gap junction360.4103776269351.10E+01−4.7499732397.01E-217downcomp59264_c0_seq1comp10397_c0_seq1
comp96275_c0_seq13inositol1,4,5-triphosphatereceptor type 120683.7206731352149.718904704−1.3852300830downcomp59099_c0_seq4comp94669_c0_seq1
comp106866_c0_seq1protein kinase A23269.047590091769531.01038396−1.7771459160downcomp65026_c0_seq1comp17984_c0_seq1
comp97791_c0_seq2phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C,beta3662.4387756017385.09474476−1.0628528548.52689E-32downcomp55943_c2_seq1comp8084_c0_seq1
comp95574_c0_seq5protein kinase,cGMP-dependent17955.701522537462015.20350361−1.4149846931.1324E-301downcomp58204_c1_seq7comp16873_c0_seq1
comp63482_c0_seq3tubulin alpha20547224.052054553712606.8022006−1.4373923620downcomp41562_c0_seq1comp14668_c0_seq1
comp94424_c0_seq3adenylate cyclase 1530.618198811511.824754972−1.5615599711.42371E-12comp29410_c0_seq1comp128727_c0_seq1
comp94556_c0_seq4adenylate cyclase 5230.170084293412.612558705−3.9411416597.22672E-73comp55791_c2_seq2/
comp69534_c0_seq1adenylate cyclase 9170.46329195290.81880247−0.821593840.069978649comp55534_c1_seq1comp4228_c0_seq1
comp76441_c0_seq1cyclin-dependentkinase 112077.410567531228214.51560537−0.9699488011.51194E-82comp27910_c0_seq1comp16516_c0_seq1
comp93202_c0_seq1epidermal growthfactor receptor651418.3968606614917.991847850.0321162270.238280263comp72419_c0_seq1comp33128_c0_seq1
comp83895_c0_seq2guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q) subunit alpha427419.02930474798036.81006701−0.9518775245.7673E-277comp55254_c0_seq5comp17311_c0_seq3
comp103695_c0_seq1growth factorreceptor-bindingprotein 2455331.55832529746753.62135235−0.7647869586.7036E-179comp59056_c4_seq1comp101386_c0_seq1
comp112119_c0_seq1GTPase KRas290411.39420805360514.6544025−0.3630334922.01055E-23comp46714_c0_seq1comp156998_c0_seq1
comp81191_c0_seq1mitogen-activatedprotein kinasekinase 116196.495897191292712.16719112−0.9053954463.63546E-94comp174562_c0_seq1comp20958_c0_seq1
comp23161_c0_seq1mitogen-activatedprotein kinase 1/3567921.44919695783130.64302995−0.5146353223.1947E-93comp28328_c0_seq1comp9963_c0_seq1
comp96783_c0_seq11son of sevenless741.1232817621953.066669068−1.4489526342.40343E-14comp47573_c1_seq1comp17032_c0_seq1
comp97420_c0_seq2tyrosine-protein kinase Src1261.1481638394604.342766357−1.9192858132.09308E-47comp56420_c1_seq1comp106968_c0_seq1
comp97925_c2_seq1tight junction protein 1710.5751275374543.810105311−2.7278770548.33036E-71comp58674_c2_seq3comp93783_c0_seq1
comp92127_c0_seq2tubulin beta63513551.0471151102657922.7626088−0.743783870comp118372_c0_seq1comp18397_c1_seq1
Figure 1

qRT-PCR detected key genes in five signaling pathways with hemocytes 5 days post-parasitization (p.p.).

Ca2+ signaling pathway regulation by M. bicoloratus parasitism with respect to apoptosis

Calcium ions (Ca2+) control every aspect of cells as cellular messengers. Ca2+ ions also can become death signals when delivered at physiologically aberrant conditions. Mitochondria eventually decide whether Ca2+ signals are life or death signals via regulation of the mitochondrial membrane proteins Bcl-2 and Bax/Bak [27]. Comparisons of the transcription data from the S and M pools indicate that all 31 elements of the Ca2+ signaling pathway existed in the examined hemocytes. Under M. bicoloratus parasitism, 3 genes (Spli-ANT, CypD, PLCG2) increased in expression, and 1 genes (Spli-PDE1) was not expressed in the parasitized hemocytes. The other 13 genes (ADCY8, ATP2A, ATP2B, CPKC, GNAS, ITPR1, ORAI1, PHKA_B, PKA, PLCB, VDAC1, VDAC2 and VDAC3) had been down-regulated (Table 3). The qRT-PCR results indicate that the parasitism up-regulated a key molecule, CypD, in the mitochondria (Fig. 1). This molecule is involved in forming a permeability transition pore complex (PTPC), suggesting that the M. bicoloratus alters Ca2+ signaling pathway to promote apoptosis.
Table 3

The differential expression of genes regulated by M. bicoloratus bracovirus in the host Ca2+ signaling pathway.

M/S
Gene familyA_IDFunctionread_MRPKM_Mread_SRPKM_Slog2(Fold_change) normalizedp-valueResultS_IDM-ID
ANTcomp95003_c0_seq1mitochondrialadenine nucleotidetranslocator4825.8190382310.50.0062538799.861813657.35681E-80up/comp41118_c0_seq1
CypDcomp93813_c0_seq1peptidyl-prolylisomerase F(cyclophilin D)4486.6963206190.50.0077428989.7562792362.02443E-75up/comp11549_c0_seq1
ADCY8comp95316_c0_seq3adenylate cyclase 84141.538851011536520.66052119−3.7469511840downcomp58820_c1_seq2comp18779_c1_seq1
ATP2Acomp23165_c0_seq2Ca2+ transportingATPase433011.267513581204232.46490454−1.5267117780downcomp45209_c0_seq2comp20999_c0_seq2
ATP2Bcomp102625_c0_seq1Ca2+ transportingATPase699816.23248031702040.90211972−1.3332921530downcomp61676_c0_seq1comp19993_c0_seq2
CPKCcomp96543_c0_seq4classical proteinkinase C15026.301173776374016.25542916−1.3672291434.6108E-232downcomp30329_c0_seq1comp20807_c0_seq1
GNAScomp97983_c1_seq2guanine nucleotide-bindingprotein G(s) subunit alpha1492.1397862763635.400899151−1.3357329037.99287E-23downcomp58416_c0_seq4comp20437_c1_seq1
ITPR1comp96275_c0_seq13inositol 1,4,5-triphosphatereceptor type 120683.7206731352149.718904704−1.3852300830downcomp59099_c0_seq4comp94669_c0_seq1
ORAI1comp97095_c0_seq1calcium release-activatedcalcium channel protein 12381.9724310745885.048676205−1.3559302674.85903E-37downcomp57934_c0_seq2comp71014_c0_seq1
PHKA_Bcomp92577_c0_seq1phosphorylase kinasealpha/beta subunit11913.399676742349010.32111467−1.6021293096.6379E-274downcomp58502_c0_seq5comp101238_c0_seq1
PKAcomp106866_c0_seq1protein kinase A23269.047590091769531.01038396−1.7771459160downcomp65026_c0_seq1comp17984_c0_seq1
PLCBcomp97791_c0_seq2Phosphatidylinositolphospholipase C, beta3662.4387756017385.09474476−1.0628528548.52689E-32downcomp55982_c0_seq1comp80726_c0_seq1
VDAC1comp90986_c0_seq1voltage-dependentanion channel protein 140.179365731421.95E+00−3.4433931093.25E-09downcomp56820_c0_seq2comp79085_c0_seq1
VDAC2comp99405_c0_seq1voltage-dependentanion channel protein 2552267.0337302910842136.3583388−1.0244438050downcomp60098_c0_seq1comp23968_c0_seq1
VDAC3comp89185_c0_seq1voltage-dependentanion channel protein 320.093999153261.27E+00−3.7515154041.70E-06downcomp60098_c0_seq1comp23968_c0_seq1
ADCY1comp94424_c0_seq3adenylate cyclase 1530.618198811511.824754972−1.5615599711.42371E-12comp48930_c1_seq2comp128727_c0_seq1
ADCY9comp69534_c0_seq1adenylate cyclase 9170.46329195290.81880247−0.821593840.069978649comp55534_c1_seq1comp4228_c0_seq1
CALMcomp23241_c0_seq1calmodulin27610270.074684142753433.2707575−0.6819104560comp45080_c1_seq2comp61330_c0_seq1
CAMK2comp97973_c0_seq1calcium/calmodulin-dependentprotein kinase II9443.29105166517376.273903548−0.9308146755.27371E-59comp57321_c0_seq1comp19479_c0_seq1
EGFRcomp93202_c0_seq1epidermal growthfactor receptor651418.3968606614917.991847850.0321162270.238280263comp72419_c0_seq1comp33128_c0_seq1
GNAQcomp83895_c0_seq2guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(q)subunit alpha427419.02930474798036.81006701−0.9518775245.7673E-277comp50512_c0_seq1comp166552_c0_seq1
ITPKcomp30903_c0_seq11D-myo-inositol-triphosphate 3-kinase96211.05221153177721.1512899−0.9364105686.25084E-61comp55786_c0_seq2comp37996_c0_seq1
MYLKcomp95483_c0_seq1myosin-light-chainkinase651.0789043491983.404944919−1.6580644931.86308E-17comp46122_c0_seq1comp119788_c0_seq1
PDE1comp96257_c0_seq5calcium/calmodulin-dependent 3′,5′-cyclicnucleotide phosphodiesterase80.0584466895314.019201305−6.1036437371.0771E-127comp58443_c0_seq1/
PHKGcomp97075_c0_seq1phosphorylase kinasegamma subunit3502.1988007756334.119996628−0.9059262632.4877E-21comp56788_c0_seq1comp57668_c0_seq1
PLCG1comp95371_c0_seq1phosphatidylinositolphospholipase C,gamma-11551.3375382682892.583733252−0.9498769633.71489E-11comp54883_c1_seq1comp81243_c0_seq1
PLCG2comp94580_c0_seq1phosphatidylinositolphospholipase C,gamma-21101.7706617021592.651644792−0.5825989280.00156832/comp78811_c0_seq1
PPP3Ccomp108295_c0_seq1serine/threonine-proteinphosphatase 2B catalyticsubunit243313.2733981426524.1065111−0.8608851071.4074E-125comp38261_c0_seq1comp20495_c0_seq2
PPP3Rcomp109656_c0_seq1serine/threonine-proteinphosphatase 2B regulatorysubunit174313.13252377274321.41173844−0.7052577397.24698E-58comp42185_c0_seq1comp35682_c0_seq1
SPHKcomp92166_c0_seq3sphingosine kinase760.798038211341.457774018−0.8692373633.52398E-05comp52416_c0_seq1comp8718_c0_seq1
STIM1comp94633_c0_seq1stromal interactionmolecule 119708.552321068253511.40173775−0.4148658033.03169E-21comp55152_c1_seq2comp19536_c0_seq1

PI3K/Akt signaling pathway regulation by M. bicoloratus parasitism

The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is involved in multiple different pathways, including cell survival, apoptosis, cell cycle, and DNA repair, through different downstream molecules. A comparison of the transcription data from the S and M pools revealed that all 65 elements of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway existed in the hemocytes. Under immune challenge, 4 genes (ATF4, RP-S6e, EIF4EBP1, and GNB1) were expressed in the parasitized hemocytes, and 7 genes (COL1AS, FGFR2, G6PC, p85, PPP2R3, THBS2S, and TSC1) were not expressed in the parasitized host hemocytes (Table 4). Another 19 genes (COL4A, CREB3, HSP90B, IRS1, ITGB1, LAMA3_5, LAMB1, LAMC1, PDPK1, PPP2C, PPP2R2, PPP2R5, PTEN, PTK2, RAC1, STK11, TSC2 and YWHAE) were down-regulated, (Table 4). The qRT-PCR results indicated that the parasitism down-regulated a key molecule, the p110 subunit, in the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, suggesting that the disruption of cell survival signaling pathway by the parasitism may promote cell apoptosis (Fig. 1).
Table 4

The differential expression of genes regulated by M. bicoloratus bracovirus in the host PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

M/S
Gene familyA_IDFunctionread_MRPKM_Mread_SRPKM_Slog2(Fold_change) normalizedp-valueResultS_IDM-ID
ATF4comp93717_c0_seq1CREB2; cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-43915.0314319730.50.0066659219.5599491118.92893E-68up/comp42406_c0_seq1
PEPCKcomp109757_c0_seq1phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP)383427.163822975744.2133349792.6886520090upcomp58069_c0_seq1comp30301_c0_seq1
RP-S6ecomp24289_c0_seq1small subunit ribosomal protein S6e135327.71890410.50.01061264411.350870448.601E-176up/comp11154_c0_seq1
COL4Acomp23243_c0_seq1type IV, alpha33659235.06260281605481161.615892−2.3050161590downcomp45047_c0_seq1comp10045_c0_seq2
CREB3comp101801_c0_seq1cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 3399524.049136061168572.87636897−1.5994660120downcomp28212_c0_seq1comp9969_c0_seq1
GSK3Bcomp23136_c0_seq1glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta124813.91068253296534.2400086−1.2994898561.9348E-170downcomp47318_c0_seq1comp20759_c0_seq2
HSP90Bcomp103187_c0_seq1heat shock protein 90kDa beta370123.9880501986566.24426184−1.4654796010downcomp28148_c0_seq1comp19950_c0_seq1
IRS1comp97702_c0_seq2insulin receptor substrate 12682.2003089946965.920159847−1.4279299914.40292E-47downcomp58222_c1_seq1comp53773_c0_seq1
ITGB1comp107868_c0_seq1integrin beta 1289711.30115561861634.82213249−1.6235342510downcomp46010_c0_seq2comp20980_c0_seq2
LAMA3_5comp99575_c0_seq1laminin, alpha 3/52785142.99292765112433179.8147605−2.0643401920downcomp59989_c0_seq1comp17635_c0_seq1
LAMB1comp95243_c0_seq1laminin, beta 11810849.2418867851196144.2366222−1.5504795690downcomp60102_c0_seq1comp10145_c0_seq2
LAMC1comp100060_c0_seq1laminin, gamma 11599940.6105253752368137.716847−1.7617794590downcomp60240_c0_seq1comp10076_c0_seq1
PDPK1comp89371_c0_seq43-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-111845.484101314231011.08513688−1.0152994575.13123E-90downcomp57389_c0_seq3comp19669_c0_seq2
PPP2Ccomp99514_c0_seq1serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit400752.057953738123109.3350776−1.070565820downcomp134046_c0_seq1comp24560_c0_seq1
PPP2R2comp95673_c0_seq2serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B3623.2766110557617.136352468−1.1229824421.08521E-35downcomp56391_c0_seq2comp21423_c0_seq2
PPP2R5comp25110_c0_seq1serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B'4144.316267161106111.46037093−1.4087976699.89141E-70downcomp226619_c0_seq1comp18379_c0_seq1
PTENcomp97411_c0_seq4PTEN2331.7592942869117.126499544−2.0181967855.8123E-99downcomp59211_c2_seq7comp62639_c0_seq1
PTK2comp89387_c1_seq2focal adhesion kinase 114437.251236554374719.50764073−1.4277403643.4416E-248downcomp58747_c0_seq2comp20857_c0_seq2
RAC1comp102261_c0_seq1Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1470322.537783311318965.48222111−1.5387576310downcomp61307_c0_seq1comp211969_c0_seq1
STK11comp68494_c0_seq3serine/threonine-protein kinase 112752.7527941046436.668487203−1.2764628056.66465E-37downcomp28880_c0_seq2comp19353_c0_seq1
TSC2comp93326_c0_seq1tuberous sclerosis 2421.0793411522276.043807401−2.485306751.25293E-32downcomp31311_c0_seq1comp76972_c0_seq1
YWHAEcomp96021_c0_seq114–3-3 protein epsilon551.035097743576.960848804−2.7494962362.16594E-56downcomp58841_c0_seq1comp18525_c1_seq1
AKTcomp103304_c0_seq1RAC serine/threonine-protein kinase459025.54854119871350.24541632−0.9757510750comp62555_c0_seq1comp30027_c0_seq1
ATF2comp63925_c0_seq1CREBP1; cyclic AMP-dependent transcription factor ATF-2331.162462472511.861274773−0.6791069080.041341344comp30829_c1_seq1comp100576_c0_seq1
BRCA1comp95658_c0_seq1breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein3552.7441221543662.931105739−0.095100310.409730291comp54774_c0_seq1comp10458_c0_seq1
CCND2comp92629_c0_seq2cyclin D218309.174971528296815.41675056−0.7487231292.87139E-69comp55005_c1_seq1comp20586_c0_seq2
CCNEcomp86772_c0_seq2cyclin E480.642601979991.373128968−1.0954698051.62283E-05comp29156_c0_seq1comp130315_c0_seq1
CDC37comp104439_c0_seq1cell division cycle protein 37164517.75049078293232.77809747−0.8848732058.69703E-91comp28183_c0_seq1comp31800_c0_seq1
CDK4comp93505_c0_seq2cyclin-dependent kinase 4911.0266903652482.898845626−1.4974773569.30914E-19comp46659_c0_seq1comp104770_c0_seq1
COL1AScomp140925_c0_seq1type I/II/III/V/XI/XXIV/XXVII, alpha0.50.035296871594.315126435−6.9337187358.23218E-15comp89703_c0_seq1/
EGFRcomp93202_c0_seq1epidermal growth factor receptor651418.3968606614917.991847850.0321162270.238280263comp72419_c0_seq1comp33128_c0_seq1
EIF4Bcomp103484_c0_seq1translation initiation factor 4B373523.01200087630740.25890145−0.8069213767.4266E-166comp45352_c0_seq1comp9966_c0_seq1
EIF4Ecomp108936_c0_seq1translation initiation factor 4E6717.905316174119214.54950751−0.880075252.69219E-37comp38976_c0_seq1comp18053_c0_seq1
EIF4EBP1comp89898_c0_seq1eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1782.1763042010.50.014453417.2343265333.10204E-18/comp65767_c0_seq1
FGFR2comp86525_c0_seq1fibroblast growth factor receptor 290.147300349801.35652114−3.2030787791.50516E-15comp134334_c0_seq1/
FRAPcomp98229_c0_seq3FKBP12-rapamycin complex-associated protein5011.20554396416164.028672805−1.7406203753.1793E-143comp57729_c1_seq1comp19045_c1_seq1
G6PCcomp92782_c0_seq1glucose-6-phosphatase20.039148868871.764346079−5.4940191825.9857E-22comp51802_c0_seq1/
GBLcomp96734_c0_seq1G protein beta subunit-like1662.7093052093075.191149459−0.93813111.47018E-11comp45689_c0_seq2comp52297_c0_seq1
GNB1comp81476_c0_seq1guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta-1759624.342987241582152.52888221−1.1096046670/comp20574_c0_seq1
GNB5comp90181_c0_seq2guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta-53374.0242748835586.903466944−0.7785922166.67432E-15comp45009_c0_seq1comp17886_c0_seq1
GNG13comp95223_c0_seq1guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-13720046.4612554833355.7102541−0.2619147596.81673E-29comp61890_c0_seq1comp24329_c0_seq1
GRB2comp103695_c0_seq1growth factor receptor-binding protein 2455331.55832529746753.62135235−0.7647869586.7036E-179comp59056_c4_seq1comp101386_c0_seq1
GYScomp95471_c0_seq2glycogen(starch) synthase960.6576277465914.194417817−2.6731275057.16393E-90comp55945_c1_seq1comp231427_c0_seq1
HSP90Acomp23248_c1_seq1molecular chaperone HtpG30676217.777814938447282.7825966−0.3768363411.7963E-255comp55995_c0_seq2comp15914_c0_seq1
IKBKBcomp46046_c0_seq1inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta6284.0376315078875.908346682−0.5492452316.14389E-13comp46039_c0_seq1comp19169_c0_seq1
INSRcomp97941_c0_seq7insulin receptor3812.0638390324052.27290447−0.1392065960.201218987comp55149_c2_seq1comp9154_c1_seq1
JAK2comp98009_c1_seq1Janus kinase 24071.9082906226913.356629968−0.8147326021.51786E-19comp93258_c0_seq1comp16460_c1_seq1
KRAScomp112119_c0_seq1GTPase KRas290411.39420805360514.6544025−0.3630334922.01055E-23comp46714_c0_seq1comp37119_c0_seq1
MAP2K1comp81191_c0_seq1mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 116196.495897191292712.16719112−0.9053954463.63546E-94comp174562_c0_seq1comp20958_c0_seq1
MAPK1_3comp23161_c0_seq1mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/3567921.44919695783130.64302995−0.5146353223.1947E-93comp28328_c0_seq1comp9963_c0_seq1
MYBcomp93622_c1_seq4myb proto-oncogene protein10934.73332862715657.021601066−0.5689449422.91134E-23comp58816_c0_seq6comp9456_c0_seq2
MYCcomp63425_c0_seq2Myc proto-oncogene protein22557.977064372320411.74260281−0.55782248.82957E-45comp47218_c0_seq2comp20721_c0_seq2
P110comp97931_c0_seq1phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase, PIK3C1651.1920854376234.663229594−1.9678418256.96353E-66comp56297_c1_seq1comp85699_c0_seq1
P85comp27492_c0_seq1phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit, PIK3R0.50.03906187151.214086421−4.9579662810.000103715comp39459_c0_seq1/
PKN;comp67156_c0_seq1protein kinase N7783.94905018313667.183549165−0.8631911093.18306E-41comp51044_c0_seq1comp19192_c0_seq1
PPP2R1comp101848_c0_seq1serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit A478835.95160432811363.11330498−0.8118880222.797E-215comp28215_c0_seq1comp10104_c0_seq1
PPP2R3comp207060_c0_seq1serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit B170.429343833421.098957536−1.3559302670.000936344comp141105_c0_seq1/
PRKAAcomp88394_c0_seq1AMPK; 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase, catalytic alpha subunit9355.51704663310816.608395875−0.2604039399.36228E-05comp46858_c0_seq1comp19779_c0_seq1
RAPTORcomp96751_c0_seq3regulatory associated protein of mTOR1861.3258226045504.061724643−1.6152046831.12036E-44comp28927_c0_seq2comp85394_c0_seq1
RHEBcomp94584_c0_seq1Ras homolog enriched in brain1502.5279733881973.43971752−0.4443088150.006072962comp83256_c0_seq1comp65541_c0_seq1
RPS6KBcomp110869_c0_seq1p70 ribosomal S6 kinase13918.265982996267216.4505016−0.9928732743.286E-100comp70041_c0_seq1comp10389_c0_seq1
SOScomp96783_c0_seq11son of sevenless741.1232817621953.066669068−1.4489526342.40343E-14comp47573_c1_seq1comp17032_c1_seq1
THBS2Scomp28902_c0_seq1thrombospondin 2/3/4/5310.720784511150.3613352440.9962300290.029739095comp378223_c0_seq1/
TSC1comp87058_c0_seq1tuberous sclerosis 1150.611757829461.943665035−1.6677470465.20854E-05comp30877_c0_seq1/
YWHAB_Q_Zcomp63845_c0_seq214-3-3 protein beta/theta/zeta2594159.754526223417181.54871003-0.4486140590comp45161_c0_seq1comp17512_c0_seq2

NF-κB signaling pathway regulation by M. bicoloratus parasitism

The NF-κB signaling pathway regulates gene expression via regulation of nuclear transcription factor. Comparison of the transcription data from the S and M pools indicates that all 18 elements of NF-κB signaling pathway existed in the hemocytes. Under M. bicoloratus parasitism, 1 gene (Spli-PLCG2) was expressed in the parasitized host hemocytes, and 5 genes (Spli-CSNK2A, MYD88, P50, P65 and XIAP) were down-regulated (Table 5). The qRT-PCR results indicate that the parasitism down-regulated two key molecules, the p50 (Relish) and p65 (Dorsal) subunits in the NF-κB signaling pathway, suggesting the disruption of the cell survival signaling pathway (Fig. 1).
Table 5

The differential expression of genes regulated by M. bicoloratus bracovirus in the host NF-κB signaling pathway.

M/S
Gene familyA_IDFunctionread_MRPKM_Mread_SRPKM_Slog2(Fold_change)normalizedp-valueResultS_IDM-ID
CSNK2Acomp67611_c0_seq1casein kinase II subunitalpha149010.76489273292721.90894546−1.0251861011.5073E-115downcomp56988_c0_seq2comp10015_c0_seq2
MYD88comp68137_c0_seq1myeloid differentiationprimary response proteinMyD885776.026390147124113.42853162−1.1559355774.14962E-60downcomp76362_c0_seq1comp49638_c0_seq1
P50comp97501_c11_seq1nuclear factor kappa-Bp105/100, Relish 1A7568.1878301115881.78E+01−1.1218284594.83E-73downcomp57569_c0_seq1comp46759_c0_seq1
P65comp89974_c0_seq4nuclear factorkappa-B/Rel, Dorsal 1A7256.34026625820921.90E+01−1.5799056372.35E-161downcomp58671_c0_seq4comp19997_c0_seq5
XIAPcomp66362_c0_seq1E3 ubiquitin-proteinligase XIAP, Bcl-2312019.18253441781449.77372136−1.3755909120downcomp62965_c0_seq1comp17943_c0_seq1
ATMcomp98156_c1_seq4ataxia telangiectasiamutated family protein6592.2242314969283.245023613−0.5449220262.64245E-13comp56187_c0_seq2comp18276_c0_seq1
BIRC2_3comp98152_c0_seq6baculoviral IAPrepeat-containing protein2/312524.41916821618586.794495692−0.6205916258.2147E-32comp57322_c0_seq1comp52055_c0_seq1
CSNK2Bcomp102869_c0_seq1casein kinase II subunitbeta223021.59701753366036.72360578−0.7658756241.66408E-88comp55287_c0_seq1comp20218_c0_seq1
IKBcomp108698_c0_seq1inhibitor of nuclearfactor kappa-B, Cactus340315.8456675636131.74E+01−0.1374657890.000117519comp46039_c0_seq1comp19169_c0_seq1
IKKBcomp46046_c0_seq1inhibitor of nuclearfactor kappa-B kinasesubunit beta6284.0376315078875.908346682−0.5492452316.14389E-13comp46039_c0_seq1comp19169_c0_seq1
IRAK4comp50303_c0_seq1interleukin-1receptor-associatedkinase 44864.0855241667236.296875769−0.6241150193.09261E-13comp55403_c1_seq1comp50008_c0_seq1
MALT1comp86328_c0_seq1MALT11101.6625645561201.879067547−0.1766065680.386011433comp29501_c0_seq1comp69294_c0_seq1
MAP3K7comp97891_c0_seq2mitogen-activatedprotein kinase kinasekinase 75413.4219547758765.740588546−0.7463779623.47289E-21comp47143_c1_seq1comp18892_c0_seq2
MAP3K7IP1comp96428_c0_seq2TAK1-binding protein 12262.4476846633874.342434795−0.827086489.53466E-12comp27058_c0_seq1comp60240_c0_seq1
PLCG1comp95371_c0_seq1phosphatidylinositolphospholipase C,gamma-11551.3375382682892.583733252−0.9498769633.71489E-11comp54883_c1_seq1comp81243_c0_seq1
PLCG2comp94580_c0_seq1phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C, gamma-21101.7706617021592.651644792−0.5825989280.00156832/comp78811_c0_seq1
TRAF6comp91031_c0_seq1TNF receptor-associatedfactor 6380.903867364541.330730718−0.5580356750.079258626comp52687_c2_seq1comp130761_c0_seq1
UBE2Icomp106025_c0_seq1ubiquitin-conjugatingenzyme E2 I163022.02296837199727.95384991−0.3440380542.46942E-12comp57828_c0_seq1comp16034_c0_seq1

ATM/p53 signaling pathway regulation by M. bicoloratus parasitism

The ATM/p53 signaling pathway plays an important role in cell cycle control and apoptosis. In normal cells, the p53 protein level is low. DNA damage and stress signaling may trigger an increase of p53 protein levels, which has three major functions: cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and apoptosis. The cell cycle arrest prevents replication of proteins involved in DNA repair. Apoptosis avoids proliferation of cells containing abnormal DNA. p53 is a transcriptional activator that regulates the expression of MDM2. A comparison of the transcription data from the S and M pools indicate that all 21 elements of the ATM/p53 signaling pathway existed in the hemocytes. Under M. bicoloratus parasitism, 1 gene (Spli-SESN), was expressed in the parasitized host hemocytes, and 1 gene (CYC) was not expressed in the parasitized host hemocytes. Another 3 genes (Spli-PPM1D, PTEN, and TSC2) were down-regulated (Table 6). The qRT-PCR results indicate that the parasitism increased expression of a key molecule, p53, in the ATM/p53 signaling pathway (Fig. 1).
Table 6

The differential expression of genes regulated by M. bicoloratus bracovirus in the host ATM/p53 signaling pathway.

M/S
Gene familyA_IDFunctionread_MRPKM_Mread_SRPKM_Slog2(Fold_change)normalizedp-valueResultS_IDM-ID
PPM1Dcomp23378_c0_seq1protein phosphatase 1D4365.19589081396811.95154904−1.2017545984.38033E-50downcomp45971_c0_seq1comp9608_c0_seq1
PTENcomp97411_c0_seq4PTEN2331.7592942869117.126499544−2.0181967855.8123E-99downcomp59211_c2_seq7comp62639_c0_seq1
TSC2comp93326_c0_seq1tuberous sclerosis 2421.0793411522276.043807401−2.485306751.25293E-32downcomp31311_c0_seq1comp12675_c0_seq1
ATMcomp98156_c1_seq4ataxia telangiectasia mutated family protein6592.2242314969283.245023613−0.5449220262.64245E-13comp56187_c0_seq2comp18276_c0_seq1
ATRcomp85208_c0_seq1serine/threonine-protein kinase ATR621.180743424981.933593758−0.711589220.00305328comp53816_c1_seq1comp15900_c0_seq1
CCNBcomp86097_c0_seq2cyclin B9844.99612829618529.742149268−0.9634295641.7509E-66comp57367_c0_seq1comp19132_c0_seq2
CCND2comp92629_c0_seq2cyclin D218309.174971528296815.41675056−0.7487231292.87139E-69comp55005_c1_seq1comp20586_c0_seq2
CCNEcomp86772_c0_seq2cyclin E480.642601979991.373128968−1.0954698051.62283E-05comp29156_c0_seq1comp130315_c0_seq1
CCNG2comp81700_c0_seq1cyclin G2221612.41316031312418.1300477−0.5465122583.78105E-42comp58929_c0_seq2comp21305_c1_seq2
CDK1comp76441_c0_seq1cyclin-dependent kinase 112077.410567531228214.51560537−0.9699488011.51194E-82comp27910_c0_seq1comp16516_c0_seq1
CDK4comp93505_c0_seq2cyclin-dependent kinase 4911.0266903652482.898845626−1.4974773569.30914E-19comp46659_c0_seq1comp104770_c0_seq1
CHK2comp93714_c0_seq1serine/threonine-protein kinase Chk21161.0424486852121.973821482−0.9210151453.88281E-08comp29305_c0_seq1comp185379_c0_seq1
CYCcomp93023_c0_seq1cytochrome c10.030570159772.438730115−6.3178622271.87344E-19comp96131_c0_seq1/
EI24comp94889_c0_seq2etoposide-induced 2.4 mRNA1431.9013852892203.030624197−0.6725640632.18683E-05comp87761_c0_seq1comp67505_c0_seq1
GADD45comp87685_c0_seq2growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible protein93310.6980601799911.86763536−0.1496832830.029048024comp58271_c0_seq2comp19840_c0_seq1
P53comp63894_c0_seq1p53165910.6158133429571.96E+01−0.8848960431.49E-91comp27951_c0_seq1comp20024_c0_seq1
RCHY1comp94630_c0_seq1RING finger and CHY zinc finger domain-containing protein 1801.3405408291402.430487591−0.8584306082.87028E-05comp30489_c0_seq1comp128683_c0_seq1
RFWD2comp93760_c0_seq1E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase RFWD21221.8534975611462.298054677−0.3101629070.094260381comp99768_c0_seq1comp10686_c1_seq1
RRM2comp100970_c0_seq1ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit M2469944.24117718633861.82281522−0.4827495781.81544E-67comp61643_c0_seq1comp10097_c0_seq1
SESNcomp313998_c0_seq1sestrin120.9675876120.50.0417690284.5338868150.000805877/comp150130_c0_seq1
SIAH1comp38385_c0_seq1E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase SIAH18864.98048214914568.479580246−0.7677074374.40084E-36comp189698_c0_seq1comp20596_c1_seq1

Discussion

M. bicoloratus parasitism regulated host hemocyte apoptosis, resulting in DNA fragmentation. In this study, we examined the impacts of both the apoptotic caspase-dependent and -independent signaling pathways on the host hemocytes based on transcriptome data. Our results demonstrated that bracovirus proteins are expressed in the host hemocytes, suggesting their roles in DNA fragmentation by regulating key signaling pathways, resulting in the triggering of caspase-dependent and -independent pathways. First, we found that M. bicoloratus parasitism regulated genes involved in forming the PTPC, which control mitochondrial apoptosis. Following M. bicoloratus parasitization, Spli-CypD was dramatically up-regulated (Table 3, Fig. 1). PTPC, which is a large multiprotein structure assembled at the contact sites between outer membrane (OM) and inner membrane (IM) of mitochondria, regulates MMP. PTPC activation provokes a sudden increase in the IM permeability to solutes of low molecular weight, causing the unregulated entry of water and osmotic swelling of the mitochondrial matrix. Numerous studies suggest that the PTPC is assembled by ANT (in the IM), VDAC (in the OM) and mitochondrial matrix protein cyclophilin D (Cyp D) [13]. According to our data, under M. bicoloratus parasitism, PTPC can form in the mitochondria of host hemocytes. Some DNA viral proteins may be direct inducers of MMP, and some may be indirect MMP facilitators, resulting in the activation of the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway [13]. This suggests an inducing condition of PTPC. M. bicoloratus parasitism may promote cell death via regulation of PTPC formation to release factors involved in DNA fragmentation from mitochondria into nuclei to cleave DNA. PTPC formed suddenly during immunochallenge, AIF, EndoG, and Cyt c in the mitochondria were released from the inter-mitochondrial space into the cytoplasm. EndoG and AIF directly move into the nucleus to digest DNA [28], [29]. In mammals, the endonuclease DFF40 initiates DNA fragmentation. A recent report found that in Caenorhabditis elegans, there is an unexpected connection between Dicer and DNA degradation during cell death [30]. The Dicer-family RNase III enzymes include helicase, PAZ, RNaseIII, and dsRNA-binding domains [30]. CED-3 cleaves DCR-1, the C. elegans Dicer orthologue, as a candidate, at a specific position to yield a short isoform termed tDCR-1, which lacks the helicase and PAZ domain, and gains the capacity to cleave DNA into fragments [31]. Once DNA suffers double-strand breaks, the ATM signaling pathway activates and interacts with many different proteins to induce cell cycle arrest, increase DNA repair, and inhibit apoptosis, which involves the p53 signaling pathway, NF-κB signaling pathway and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway via the activation of IKKβ and p53 [32]. Typically, the activated ATM signaling pathway should inhibit host cell apoptosis for cell survival [33], [34]. At this point, we wish to examine how the parasitism inhibited the ATM-triggered DNA repair and cell survival signaling pathways. During DNA damage in the host hemocytes, ATM is expressed (Table 6). The ATM signaling pathway is responsible for DNA repair via activation of the related cell survival signaling pathway [35]. DNA damage may activate protein kinases, such as ATM, to phosphorylate p53 at one of these three residues, which thereby increases the p53 level. After the DNA damage is repaired, the ATM kinase is no longer active. p53 will be quickly dephosphorylated and destroyed by the accumulated MDM2 [36]. p53 is conserved across eukaryotic organisms, and the decrease of transcriptional levels of genes regulated by p53 leads to a subdued resistance to pathogens infections. In C. elegans, p53/CEP-1 are inhibited by the nucleolar protein NOL-6, a nucleolar RNA-associated protein, causing innate immune suppression [37]. It is well known that PI3K/Akt signaling pathway regulates cell survival and apoptosis. PI3K is composed of heterodimers of inhibitory adaptor/regulatory (p85) and a catalytic (p110) subunits. p85 binds and integrates signals from various cellular proteins, including transmembrane tyrosine kinase-linked receptors and intracellular proteins, providing an integration point for activation of p110. Akt, which contains a PH domain in the N-terminal region, is the primary downstream mediator of the effects of PI3K. The PH domain of Akt interacts with 3′-phosphoinositides, contributing to recruitment of Akt to the plasma membrane. Recruitment to the membrane results in a conformation change, contributing to exposure of two crucial phosphorylation sites, serine 473 and threonine 308, for activation. An unexpected finding is that p85 was not expressed under M. bicoloratus parasitism (Table 4). HSV-1, herpes simplex virus, induces the phosphorylation of Akt during infection of oral epithelial cells, leading to anti-apoptosis, and inhibition of HSV-1-induced PI3K activity increases DNA fragmentation [17]. Insect baculovirus AcMNPV activates PI3K/Akt signaling pathway antiapoptosis to replicate itself in the host cell via enhancing phosphorylation of Ser 473 of Akt [18]. In our laboratory, overexpression of the gap junction proteins Inx2 and Inx3 caused dramatic apoptosis in Sf9 and Spli221 cells but no phosphorylation of Akt in Hi5 cell lines, which reveals an anti-apoptosis function [26]. NF-κB signaling pathway regulates cell survival and apoptosis. In innate immunosuppression in invertebrates, it is well known that PDV protein vankyrins, which lack the phosphorylation and ubiquitination domains, function as IκB mimics via completion for the NF-κB site with IκB [38]. This results in retention of NF-κB in the cytoplasm, which inhibits immune gene expression for products such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [39]. Three vankyrin genes were expressed in the host hemocytes (Table 1). NF-κB is constituted of p50 and p65 subunits. Normally, the p50/p65 complex is released from IκB and translocated to the nucleus to activate the transcription of genes involved in cell survival. During the immunochallenge, p50 and p65 were down-regulated by M. bicoloratus parasitism (Table 5, Fig. 1) suggesting that M. bicoloratus blocked the critical signaling pathway to promote cell apoptosis. Ca2+ overload from the ER to mitochondria is required for initiation of programmed cell death. An unexpected result concerns Ca2+ loading between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. Previously, we proposed that innexin hemichannels on the ER can be Ca2+ channels, providing a pannexin 3-like function in the mammal to deliver Ca2+ [24], [31]. In such a case, inx genes should be up-regulated to produce more hemichannels, but 3 inx genes were been down-regulated, only inx4 was up-regulated (Table 2, Fig. 1). This suggests a disruption in hemichannel activation under M. bicoloratus parasitism. In Table 1 and Fig. 1, we show six types of gene transcriptions in the parasitized host hemocytes related to the Ankyrin-repeat, PTP, C-type lectin, Ben domain, Mucin-like and EGF-like families. Recent research indicates that C-type lectin (SIGN-R1) enhances uptake and the processing of circulating apoptotic cells in the spleen [40]. CpBV-lectin encoded by C. plutellae bracovirus is secreted into plasma and binds to the surface of parasitoid eggs to induce host immunosuppression via inhibition of host hemocyte non-self recognition [41]. In our research system, considering the interaction between M. bicoloratus bracovirus proteins and apoptosis, whether MbBV-lectin provides a relative contribution to apoptotic cell clearance, similar to SIGN-R1, requires further examination. However, it is reasonable to indicate that most important genes displayed less transcription in the host hemocytes during apoptosis. The Ben domain-containing proteins are well known to be involved in the transcriptional repression through its interaction with histone deacetylase, and overexpression causes cell cycle arrest [42]. The ankyrin-repeat protein family acts as inhibitors of nuclear transcription factors via binding of NF-κB homodimers [39]. Protein tyrosine phosphatases are the largest family encoded by bracovirus, and PTPs are well known as a regulator of apoptosis in human [43], such as PTP-1B regulation of the PI3K/Akt cascade to influence the nuclear localization of FOXO1, a transcription factor that regulates the expression of several pro-apoptotic genes [44], and SHP-1 that disrupts anti-apoptotic pathways through the regulation of the p85 subunit of PI3K [45], and TC-PTP also regulates p53 expression during apoptosis [46]. PTP-H2 from MdBV is a functional tyrosine phosphatase [47] and induces apoptosis of Sf21 cells [48]. MbCrp (egf-like) disrupts the cytoskeleton of host hemocytes [49]. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that M. bicoloratus parasitism could regulate critical signaling pathways of host hemocytes to promote apoptosis to suppress host cellular immunity. Bracovirus may regulate proteins to form a PTPC structure that altered mitochondrial permeability, resulting in the release of DNA fragmentation elements, causing DNA damage and keeping ATM expression. This might have implications for better understanding of the mechanism of innate immunosuppression via the apoptosis pathway. However, analysis of the bracovirus proteins regulation of the critical signaling pathway may involve three levels in the cell, as a ligand binding to receptor on the cell surface, as a mini-protein to compete with scaffold proteins, as a nuclear factor to promote gene expression, as a host translation inhibitory factor to inhibit host protein translation or utilization of an RNAi mechanism [50] to inhibit gene expression on the mRNA level. The proteins responsible for specific signaling molecules in host hemocytes remain to elucidated.

Materials and Methods

Insect rearing and experimental animals

The S. litura colony was reared on an artificial diet (formulated according to [51]) at 27±1°C, RH 60–80%, and under a 12∶12 h photoperiod regimen. The parasitoid M. bicoloratus colony was maintained on S. litura larvae reared in the laboratory according to established methods [52]. Adults were also provided with honey as a dietary supplement.

Isolation of hemocytes from larvae of S. litura

Hemocytes were collected 5 days post-parasitization from parasitized S. litura larvae (more than 1,000) (when immature parasitoids in the host developed to the second larvae [52], approximately 21% hemocytes underwent apoptosis [1]) and named ‘M’ (parasitized by M. bicoloratus) in this paper. The fourth instar S. litura larvae were used to collect hemocytes to serve as the control group, named ‘S’ (non-parasitized S. litura hemocytes) in this paper.

Total RNA extraction

Total RNA was isolated from hemocytes using an RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Maryland, USA), which is specific for genome DNA elimination, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of each RNA sample was determined by measuring OD at A260/A280 using the NanoDrop 2000 and running 1 x TBE agarose gel. High quality samples (with an A260/A280 ratio >2.0, A260/A230>2.0, concentration>500 ng/ul) showing 28S and 18S RNA bands clearly were stored at −80°C until use. RNA was prepared from at least two biological replicates and used for independent library preparations.

Transcription mRNA sequencing, assemble, gene predicted

Sequencing libraries were prepared using a RNA-Seq sample preparation kit from Illumina following the manufacturer’s instructions. The transcription sequences were sequenced using an Illumina Hiseq2000, and the total base number was more than 26.3 Gb per sample. There were two replications for the M1, M2, S1, and S2 pools. RNA-seq de novo assembly was performed using Trinity [53]. GetORF in EBOSS were used to find protein from contigs [54].

Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG data

GO Slim test were assigned to the NR-annotated transcripts using a local Blast2GO pipeline b2g4pipe [55] with access to a local GO MySQL database (version of April 2013). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) was used for analysis of molecular networks [56].

Definition of up- or down-regulated genes based on fold change

Clean reads were mapping to assembled contigs, to get RPM value based on reads number [57]. Statistical analysis of data was performed using DESeq [58]. Transcript abundances for each gene were expressed as a weighted mean of counts from each replicate normalized to the overall library size (known as ‘base mean’). p-values (adjusted for false discovery rate) were generated for each gene in pair-wise comparisons between different conditions. In our analyses, we used an adjusted p-value of 0.001 as a criteria for identifying significant differences in gene expression.

Total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from hemocytes of parasitized S. litura larvae 5 days post-parasitization using RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), according to manufacturer’s instructions, including DNase treatment. The concentration and purity of each RNA sample was determined by measuring OD at A260/A280 using NanoDrop 2000. Samples with an A260/A280 ratio >2.0) were used to synthesize cDNA using Oligo d (T) 18 primers following manufacturer’s instruction (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). All cDNA samples were stored at −80°C for preservation. qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR PCR Kit (Takara, Dalin, China) with the ABI 7500 system following the cycling parameters: 50°C, 2 min; 95°C, 10 mim; 95°C, 5 sec, 60°C, 34 sec, 40 cycles; 95°C, 15 sec; 60°C, 1 min; 95°C, 30 sec; 60°C, 15 sec. The 2-ΔΔCT method was used to get the relative mRNA levels [59]. 18S rDNA gene was used as the housekeeping genes for normalization. Three replications have been carried out for per sample.

GenBank accession numbers

The whole RNA-Seq project was deposited into DDBJ/DRA/GenBank under the accession DRA001149. Completed ORF and short qRT-PCR products. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Sample information. (XLS) Click here for additional data file. Sequencing output and quality. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. EST cluster contigs. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. Primers of completed ORF and short qRT-PCR. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  56 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Cell biology. Apoptosis--the calcium connection.

Authors:  Nicolas Demaurex; Clark Distelhorst
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Inhibitor kappaB-like proteins from a polydnavirus inhibit NF-kappaB activation and suppress the insect immune response.

Authors:  Honglada Thoetkiattikul; Markus H Beck; Michael R Strand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Ali Mortazavi; Brian A Williams; Kenneth McCue; Lorian Schaeffer; Barbara Wold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  The encapsidated genome of Microplitis demolitor bracovirus integrates into the host Pseudoplusia includens.

Authors:  Markus H Beck; Shu Zhang; Kavita Bitra; Gaelen R Burke; Michael R Strand
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ariel Bensimon; Ruedi Aebersold; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  SIGN-R1, a C-type lectin, enhances apoptotic cell clearance through the complement deposition pathway by interacting with C1q in the spleen.

Authors:  M G Prabagar; Y Do; S Ryu; J-Y Park; H-J Choi; W-S Choi; T J Yun; J Moon; I-S Choi; K Ko; K Ko; C Young Shin; C Cheong; Y-S Kang
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Cleavage preferences of the apoptotic endonuclease DFF40 (caspase-activated DNase or nuclease) on naked DNA and chromatin substrates.

Authors:  P Widlak; P Li; X Wang; W T Garrard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Protein tyrosine phosphatases: emerging regulators of apoptosis.

Authors:  Maxime Hallé; Michel L Tremblay; Tzu-Ching Meng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  The role of the PI3K-Akt signal transduction pathway in Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus infection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells.

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Yi Yang; Qingbei Weng; Tiehao Lin; Meijin Yuan; Kai Yang; Yi Pang
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.616

View more
  7 in total

1.  Bracovirus Sneaks Into Apoptotic Bodies Transmitting Immunosuppressive Signaling Driven by Integration-Mediated eIF5A Hypusination.

Authors:  Gui-Fang Zhou; Chang-Xu Chen; Qiu-Chen Cai; Xiang Yan; Nan-Nan Peng; Xing-Cheng Li; Ji-Hui Cui; Yun-Feng Han; Qi Zhang; Jiang-Hui Meng; Hong-Mei Tang; Chen-Hui Cai; Jin Long; Kai-Jun Luo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Oncogenic role of Tc17 cells in cervical cancer development.

Authors:  Zun-Sheng Zhang; Ying Gu; Bing-Gang Liu; Hong Tang; Yu Hua; Jun Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Microplitis bicoloratus bracovirus regulates cyclophilin A-apoptosis-inducing factor interaction to induce cell apoptosis in the insect immunosuppressive process.

Authors:  Yan Hu; Ya-Ping Liang; Hang-Yu Tian; Cui-Xian Xu; Dan Yu; Pan Zhang; Hui Ye; Ming Li
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.454

4.  Transcriptome analysis of dormant tomonts of the marine fish ectoparasitic ciliate Cryptocaryon irritans under low temperature.

Authors:  Fei Yin; Peng Sun; Jiteng Wang; Quanxin Gao
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  The multifunctional polydnavirus TnBVANK1 protein: impact on host apoptotic pathway.

Authors:  Rosanna Salvia; Gerarda Grossi; Angela Amoresano; Carmen Scieuzo; Marisa Nardiello; Chiara Giangrande; Ilaria Laurenzana; Vitalba Ruggieri; Sabino A Bufo; S Bradleigh Vinson; Monica Carmosino; David Neunemann; Heiko Vogel; Pietro Pucci; Patrizia Falabella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Response analysis of host Spodoptera exigua larvae to infection by Heliothis virescens ascovirus 3h (HvAV-3h) via transcriptome.

Authors:  Huan Yu; Zi-Qi Li; Lei He; Yi-Yi Ou-Yang; Ni Li; Guo-Hua Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Innexins: Expression, Regulation, and Functions.

Authors:  Juan Güiza; Iván Barría; Juan C Sáez; José L Vega
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.566

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.