Literature DB >> 25348342

The TRANSFORM Patient Safety Project: a microsystem approach to improving outcomes on inpatient units.

Clarence H Braddock1, Nancy Szaflarski, Lynn Forsey, Lynn Abel, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, John Morton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in hospital patient safety have been made, but innovative approaches are needed to accelerate progress. Evidence is emerging that microsystem approaches to quality and safety improvement in hospital care are effective.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of a multifaceted, microsystem-level patient safety program on clinical outcomes and safety culture on inpatient units.
DESIGN: A 1-year prospective interventional study was conducted, followed by a 6-month sustainability phase. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four medical and surgical inpatient units within an academic university medical center were included, with registered nurses and residents representing study participants.
INTERVENTIONS: In situ simulation training; debriefing of medical emergencies; monthly patient safety team meetings; patient safety champion role; interdisciplinary patient safety conferences; recognition program for exemplary teamwork. OUTCOMES: Hospital-acquired severe sepsis/septic shock and acute respiratory failure; unplanned transfers to higher level of care (HLOC); weighted risk-adjusted mortality. Safety culture was measured using a widely accepted, validated survey.
RESULTS: Rates of hospital-acquired severe sepsis/septic shock and acute respiratory failure decreased on study units, from 1.78 to 0.64 (p = 0.04) and 2.44 to 0.43 per 1,000 unit discharges (p = 0.03), respectively. The mean number of days between cases of severe sepsis/septic shock increased from baseline to the intervention period (p = 0.03). Unplanned transfers to HLOC increased from 715 to 764 per 1,000 unit transfers (p = 0.08). The weighted risk-adjusted observed-to-expected mortality ratio on all study units decreased from 0.50 to 0.40 (p < 0.001). Overall scores of safety culture on study units improved after the 1-year intervention, significantly for nurses (p < 0.001), but not for residents (p = 0.06). Scores significantly improved in nine of twelve survey dimensions for nurses, compared to in four dimensions for residents.
CONCLUSION: A multifaceted patient safety program suggested an association with improved hospital-acquired complications and weighted, risk-adjusted mortality, and improved nurses' perceptions of safety culture on inpatient study units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25348342      PMCID: PMC4370988          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3067-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  34 in total

1.  Improving safety on the front lines: the role of clinical microsystems.

Authors:  J J Mohr; P B Batalden
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-03

2.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A prospective controlled trial of the effect of a multi-faceted intervention on early recognition and intervention in deteriorating hospital patients.

Authors:  I A Mitchell; H McKay; C Van Leuvan; R Berry; C McCutcheon; B Avard; N Slater; T Neeman; P Lamberth
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals.

Authors:  Sara Singer; Shoutzu Lin; Alyson Falwell; David Gaba; Laurence Baker
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Clinical microsystems, Part 3. Transformation of two hospitals using microsystem, mesosystem, and macrosystem strategies.

Authors:  Marjorie M Godfrey; Craig N Melin; Stephen E Muething; Paul B Batalden; Eugene C Nelson
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-10

6.  Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital.

Authors:  M D Buist; E Jarmolowski; P R Burton; S A Bernard; B P Waxman; J Anderson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-07-05       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Intensive care unit safety culture and outcomes: a US multicenter study.

Authors:  David T Huang; Gilles Clermont; Lan Kong; Lisa A Weissfeld; J Bryan Sexton; Kathy M Rowan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Impact of the Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) on safety culture in a surgical inpatient unit.

Authors:  Joanne Timmel; Paula S Kent; Christine G Holzmueller; Lori Paine; Richard D Schulick; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-06

9.  A model for increasing patient safety in the intensive care unit: increasing the implementation rates of proven safety measures.

Authors:  W S Krimsky; I B Mroz; J K McIlwaine; S D Surgenor; D Christian; H L Corwin; D Houston; C Robison; N Malayaman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02

10.  Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Christine A Goeschel; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Sam Watson; Lisa H Lubomski; Sean M Berenholtz; David A Thompson; David J Sinopoli; Sara Cosgrove; J Bryan Sexton; Jill A Marsteller; Robert C Hyzy; Robert Welsh; Patricia Posa; Kathy Schumacher; Dale Needham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  TRANSFORM-ing patient safety culture: a universal imperative.

Authors:  Edmondo Robinson; Tara Lagu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Improving safety and reducing error in endoscopy: simulation training in human factors.

Authors:  Srivathsan Ravindran; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Sam Murray; Eleanor Wood
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Goldshtein; Cole Krensky; Sachin Doshi; Vsevolod S Perelman
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2019-12-24

4.  GENESISS 2-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a systematic mapping review.

Authors:  Kerry Evans; Jenny Woodruff; Alison Cowley; Louise Bramley; Giulia Miles; Alastair Ross; Joanne Cooper; Bryn Baxendale
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.263

Review 5.  Culture of Safety: Impact on Improvement in Infection Prevention Process and Outcomes.

Authors:  Barbara I Braun; Salome O Chitavi; Hiroyuki Suzuki; Caroline A Soyemi; Mireia Puig-Asensio
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Translational simulation: not 'where?' but 'why?' A functional view of in situ simulation.

Authors:  Victoria Brazil
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.