Literature DB >> 25347313

The falsifiability of actual decision-making models.

Andrew Heathcote1, E-J Wagenmakers2, Scott D Brown1.   

Abstract

Jones and Dzhafarov (2014) provided a useful service in pointing out that some assumptions of modern decision-making models require additional scrutiny. Their main result, however, is not surprising: If an infinitely complex model was created by assigning its parameters arbitrarily flexible distributions, this new model would be able to fit any observed data perfectly. Such a hypothetical model would be unfalsifiable. This is exactly why such models have never been proposed in over half a century of model development in decision making. Additionally, the main conclusion drawn from this result-that the success of existing decision-making models can be attributed to assumptions about parameter distributions-is wrong. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25347313     DOI: 10.1037/a0037771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  3 in total

1.  How to discriminate conclusively among different models of decision making?

Authors:  David Thura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

3.  A new framework for modeling decisions about changing information: The Piecewise Linear Ballistic Accumulator model.

Authors:  William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.