Literature DB >> 25346514

Impact of steerable sheaths on contact forces and reconnection sites in ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Waqas Ullah1, Ross J Hunter, Ailsa McLean, Mehul Dhinoja, Mark J Earley, Simon Sporton, Richard J Schilling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In preclinical studies, catheter contact force (CF) during radiofrequency ablation correlates with the subsequent lesion size. We investigated the impact of steerable sheaths on ablation CF, its consistency, and wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) line reconnection sites. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Five thousand and sixty-four ablations were analyzed across 60 patients undergoing first-time ablation for persistent AF using a CF-sensing catheter: 19 manual nonsteerable sheath (Manual-NSS), 11 manual steerable sheath, and 30 robotic steerable sheath (Sensei, Hansen Medical Inc.) procedures were studied. Ablation CFs were higher in the steerable sheath groups for all left atrial ablations and also WACA ablations specifically (P < 0.006), but less consistent per WACA segment (P < 0.005). There were significant differences in the CFs around both WACAs by group: in the left WACA CFs were lower with Manual-NSS, other than at the anterior-inferior and posterior-superior regions, and lower in the right WACA, other than the anterior-superior region. There was a difference in the proportion of segments chronically reconnecting across groups: Manual-NSS 26.5%, manual steerable sheath 4.6%, robotic 12% (P < 0.0005). The left atrial appendage/PV ridge and right posterior wall were common sites of reconnection in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Steerable sheaths increased ablation CF; however, there were region-specific heterogeneities in the extent of increment, with some segments where they failed to increase CF. Steerable sheath use was associated with reduced WACA-segment reconnection. It may be that the benefits of steerable sheath use in terms of higher CFs could be translated to improved clinical outcomes if regional weaknesses of this technology are taken into account during ablation procedures.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; contact force; remote robotic navigation; steerable sheaths

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25346514     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  9 in total

Review 1.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 2.  Radiation Dose is Significantly Reduced by Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheter During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Vincenzo La Rocca; Vincenzo Schillaci; Alfonso Panella; Gergana Shopova; Felice Nappi; Francesco Urraro; Giovanni Russo; Giovanni Napolitano; Paola Chiariello
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force.

Authors:  Masaharu Masuda; Masashi Fujita; Osamu Iida; Shin Okamoto; Takayuki Ishihara; Kiyonori Nanto; Takashi Kanda; Tatsuya Shiraki; Akihiro Sunaga; Yasuhiro Matsuda; Masaaki Uematsu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Optimizing Durability in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Zain I Sharif; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-05-15

5.  A novel all-retrograde approach for t-Branch implantation in ruptured thoracoabdominal aneurysm.

Authors:  A Claire Watkins; Alla Avramenko; Raphael Soler; Dominique Fabre; Stephan Haulon
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Choice of Steerable Sheath Impacts Contact Force Stability During Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Evan Hiner; Dipak P Shah
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-12-15

7.  Endovascular steerable and endobronchial precurved guiding sheaths for transbronchial needle delivery under augmented fluoroscopy and cone beam CT image guidance.

Authors:  Quirina M B de Ruiter; Joseph R Fontana; William F Pritchard; Michal Mauda-Havakuk; Ivane Bakhutashvili; Juan A Esparza-Trujillo; Nicole A Varble; Marco Verstege; Sheng Xu; Reza Seifabadi; Robert F Browning; Bradford J Wood; John W Karanian
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08

8.  Use of a Steerable Sheath for Completely Femoral Access in Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair Compared to Upper Extremity Access.

Authors:  Sven R Hauck; Wolf Eilenberg; Alexander Kupferthaler; Maximilian Kern; Theresa-Marie Dachs; Alexander Wressnegger; Christoph Neumayer; Christian Loewe; Martin A Funovics
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Mhanna; Azizullah Beran; Ahmad Al-Abdouh; Omar Sajdeya; Mahmoud Barbarawi; Mahmoud Alsaiqali; Ahmad Jabri; Ahmad Al-Aaraj; Abdulmajeed Alharbi; Paul Chacko
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-06-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.