Literature DB >> 10669517

Lateralized tinnitus studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging: abnormal inferior colliculus activation.

J R Melcher1, I S Sigalovsky, J J Guinan, R A Levine.   

Abstract

Tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of external stimuli, is a common and often disturbing symptom that is not understood physiologically. This paper presents an approach for using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the physiology of tinnitus and demonstrates that the approach is effective in revealing tinnitus-related abnormalities in brain function. Our approach as applied here included 1) using a masking noise stimulus to change tinnitus loudness and examining the inferior colliculus (IC) for corresponding changes in activity, 2) separately considering subpopulations with particular tinnitus characteristics, in this case tinnitus lateralized to one ear, 3) controlling for intersubject differences in hearing loss by considering only subjects with normal or near-normal audiograms, and 4) tailoring the experimental design to the characteristics of the tinnitus subpopulation under study. For lateralized tinnitus subjects, we hypothesized that sound-evoked activation would be abnormally asymmetric because of the asymmetry of the tinnitus percept. This was tested using two reference groups for comparison: nontinnitus subjects and nonlateralized tinnitus subjects. Binaural noise produced abnormally asymmetric IC activation in every lateralized tinnitus subject (n = 4). In reference subjects (n = 9), activation (i.e., percent change in image signal) in the right versus left IC did not differ significantly. Compared with reference subjects, lateralized tinnitus subjects showed abnormally low percent signal change in the IC contralateral, but not ipsilateral, to the tinnitus percept. Consequently, activation asymmetry (i.e., the ratio of percent signal change in the IC ipsilateral versus contralateral to the tinnitus percept) was significantly greater in lateralized tinnitus subjects as compared with reference subjects. Monaural noise also produced abnormally asymmetric IC activation in lateralized tinnitus subjects. Two possible models are presented to explain why IC activation was abnormally low contralateral to the tinnitus percept in lateralized tinnitus subjects. Both assume that the percept is associated with abnormally high ("tinnitus-related") neural activity in the contralateral IC. Additionally, they assume that either 1) additional activity evoked by sound was limited by saturation or 2) sound stimulation reduced the level of tinnitus-related activity as it reduced the loudness of (i.e., masked) the tinnitus percept. In summary, this work demonstrates that fMRI can provide objective measures of lateralized tinnitus and tinnitus-related activation can be interpreted at a neural level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10669517     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.2.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  75 in total

1.  Blast-induced tinnitus and hearing loss in rats: behavioral and imaging assays.

Authors:  Johnny C Mao; Edward Pace; Paige Pierozynski; Zhifeng Kou; Yimin Shen; Pamela VandeVord; E Mark Haacke; Xueguo Zhang; Jinsheng Zhang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Amber M Leaver; Mark Mühlau
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Functional connectivity networks in nonbothersome tinnitus.

Authors:  Andre M Wineland; Harold Burton; Jay Piccirillo
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; Jennifer R Melcher; Barbara C Fullerton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Lateralization of neural activity associated with tinnitus.

Authors:  Robert L Folmer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  Identifying tinnitus subgroups with cluster analysis.

Authors:  Richard Tyler; Claudia Coelho; Pan Tao; Haihong Ji; William Noble; Anne Gehringer; Stephanie Gogel
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Phase I trial of caudate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant tinnitus.

Authors:  Steven W Cheung; Caroline A Racine; Jennifer Henderson-Sabes; Carly Demopoulos; Annette M Molinaro; Susan Heath; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Andrea L Bourne; John E Rietcheck; Sarah S Wang; Paul S Larson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Relationship between noise-induced hearing-loss, persistent tinnitus and growth-associated protein-43 expression in the rat cochlear nucleus: does synaptic plasticity in ventral cochlear nucleus suppress tinnitus?

Authors:  K S Kraus; D Ding; H Jiang; E Lobarinas; W Sun; R J Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Reduced Structural Connectivity Between Left Auditory Thalamus and the Motion-Sensitive Planum Temporale in Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Nadja Tschentscher; Anja Ruisinger; Helen Blank; Begoña Díaz; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Tinnitus intensity dependent gamma oscillations of the contralateral auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elsa van der Loo; Steffen Gais; Marco Congedo; Sven Vanneste; Mark Plazier; Tomas Menovsky; Paul Van de Heyning; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.