| Literature DB >> 35155332 |
Caiyun Yang1, Xixi Sun2, Wenjie Duan2.
Abstract
Our study examined how lifestyle and number of children influence the relationship between widowhood and life satisfaction based on self-regulation theory. A sample of 2,968 elderly respondents (male = 1,515, female = 1,453, mean age = 69.12 years, SD = 7.24) participated in Chinese General Social Survey. Our findings suggest that lifestyle is positively related to life satisfaction, and number of children is positively associated with life satisfaction but negatively related to lifestyle. The moderated mediation model demonstrated that lifestyle partly mediated the relationship between widowhood and life satisfaction. Moreover, number of children moderated the relationship between widowhood and lifestyle and between lifestyle and satisfaction with life. Widowed elderly individuals who have more children are likely to show a higher level of satisfaction with life. The present study has significance in practice because it provides empirical implications obtained from a national survey on the universal two-child policy in China as two children might decrease the negative impacts of widowhood on life satisfaction.Entities:
Keywords: life satisfaction; lifestyle; moderated mediation; number of children; self-regulation theory; widowhood status
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35155332 PMCID: PMC8826226 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.754681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Sample characteristics.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Age | 69.12 (7.238) |
|
| |
| Male | 1,515 (51%) |
| Female | 1,453 (49%) |
|
| |
| Urban | 1,351 (45.5%) |
| Rural | 1,617 (54.5%) |
|
| |
| Widowed | 766 (25.8%) |
| Male | 253 (33.0%) |
| Female | 513 (67.0%) |
| Non-widowed | 2,202 (74.2%) |
| Male | 1,262 (57.3%) |
| Female | 9.40 (42.7%) |
| Educational level | 1.57 (0.940) |
| Socioeconomic state level | 2.61 (0.720) |
| Number of children | 2.82 (1.491) |
Pearson and partial correlations.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 1. Lifestyle | |||
| 2. Satisfaction with life | 0.17 | ||
| 3. Number of children | −0.22 | 0.04 | |
|
| 1.98 | 3.80 | 2.82 |
| Median | 1.89 | 4.00 | 3.00 |
|
| 0.58 | 0.86 | 1.49 |
The controlled variables were gender, age, education, socioeconomic status, and location.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01.
Hierarchical regression of demographic variables, marital status, lifestyle, and number of children.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 0.006 | 0.048 | 2.748 | 1.014 | 0.007 | 0.062 | 3.321 | 1.123 | 0.008 | 0.071 | 3.861 | 1.131 | 0.006 | 0.051 | 2.556 | 1.347 |
| Gender | 0.075 | 0.044 | 2.431 | 1.048 | 0.089 | 0.052 | 2.842 | 1.092 | 0.090 | −0.053 | 2.907 | 1.092 | 0.086 | 0.050 | 2.747 | 1.097 |
| Residence | −0.009 | 0.010 | −0.484 | 1.324 | −0.009 | −0.010 | −0.488 | 1.324 | −0.042 | −0.047 | −2.279 | 1.429 | −0.033 | −0.037 | −1.737 | 1.491 |
| Socioeconomic status | 0.365 | 0.306 | 16.947 | 1.067 | 0.361 | 0.304 | 16.781 | 1.071 | −0.037 | −0.041 | −1.946 | 1.481 | −0.032 | −0.035 | −1.630 | 1.504 |
| Education | −0.003 | 0.019 | −1.37 | 1.383 | −0.006 | −0.007 | −0.327 | 1.393 | 0.337 | 0.283 | 15.564 | 1.102 | 0.334 | 0.281 | 15.400 | 1.106 |
| Marital status | −0.085 | −0.043 | −2.271 | 1.186 | −0.082 | −0.042 | −2.204 | 1.186 | −0.081 | −0.041 | −2.196 | 1.186 | ||||
| lifestyle | 0.199 | 0.135 | 6.660 | 1.375 | 0.203 | 0.138 | 6.773 | 1.378 | ||||||||
| Number of children | 0.029 | 0.050 | 2.451 | 1.361 | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.094 | 0.096 | 0.109 | 0.111 | ||||||||||||
|
| 61.452 | 52.142 | 51.683 | 46.050 | ||||||||||||
| Δ | 0.002 | 0.013 | 0.002 | |||||||||||||
| Δ | 5.159 | 44.351 | 6.009 | |||||||||||||
Beta means beta densities and VIF means variance inflation factor.
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01.
Results of moderated mediation analysis.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Marital status | a1 | −0.264 | 0.053 | <0.001 | c1' | −0.206 | 0.079 | 0.093 |
| Lifestyle | – | – | – | b1 | 0.129 | 0.056 | <0.05 | |
| Number of children | a2 | −0.100 | 0.009 | <0.001 | c2' | −0.070 | 0.040 | 0.077 |
| Marital status × number of children | a3 | 0.053 | 0.015 | <0.001 | c3' | 0.037 | 0.023 | 0.105 |
| Lifestyle × number of children | – | – | – | – | b2 | 0.054 | 0.019 | <0.01 |
| Age (control variable) | 0.002 | 0.002 | <0.01 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.103 | ||
| Constant | 2.183 | 0.106 | <0.001 | 3.197 | 0.194 | <0.001 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Direct effect at values of the moderator | 1.328 | −0.157 | 0.054 | <0.01 | ||||
| 2.819 | −0.102 | 0.038 | <0.01 | |||||
| 4.310 | −0.047 | 0.047 | 0.311 | |||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Indirect effect at values of the moderator | 1.328 | −0.039 | 0.011 | −0.062, −0.021 | ||||
| 2.820 | −0.032 | 0.008 | −0.048, −0.018 | |||||
| 4.310 | −0.013 | 0.010 | −0.033, 0.007 |