Literature DB >> 33717420

Is Tumor Cell Specificity Distinct from Tumor Selectivity In Vivo?: A Quantitative NIR Molecular Imaging Analysis of Nanoliposome Targeting.

Girgis Obaid1,2, Kimberley Samkoe3, Kenneth Tichauer4, Shazia Bano1, Yeonjae Park3, Zachary Silber1, Sassan Hodge3, Susan Callaghan1, Mina Guirguis2, Srivalleesha Mallidi1, Brian Pogue3, Tayyaba Hasan1,5.   

Abstract

The significance and ability for receptor targeted nanoliposomes (tNLs) to bind to their molecular targets in solid tumors in vivo has been questioned, particularly as the efficiency of their tumor accumulation and selectivity is not always predictive of their efficacy or molecular specificity. This study presents, for the first time, in situ NIR molecular imaging-based quantitation of the in vivo specificity of tNLs for their target receptors, as opposed to tumor selectivity, which includes influences of enhanced tumor permeability and retention. Results show that neither tumor delivery nor selectivity (tumor-to-normal ratio) of cetuximab and IRDye conjugated tNLs correlate with EGFR expression in U251, U87 and 9L tumors, and in fact underrepresent their imaging-derived molecular specificity by up to 94.2%. Conversely, their in vivo specificity, which we quantify as the concentration of tNL-reported tumor EGFR provided by NIR molecular imaging, correlates positively with EGFR expression levels in vitro and ex vivo (Pearson's r= 0.92 and 0.96, respectively). This study provides a unique opportunity to address the problematic disconnect between tNL synthesis and in vivo specificity. The findings encourage their continued adoption as platforms for precision medicine, and facilitates intelligent synthesis and patient customization in order to improve safety profiles and therapeutic outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Molecular Recognition; Nanoparticles; Receptors; Specificity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33717420      PMCID: PMC7951968          DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-3178-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Res        ISSN: 1998-0000            Impact factor:   8.897


  63 in total

1.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted immunophotodiagnosis and photoimmunotherapy of oral precancer in vivo.

Authors:  N S Soukos; M R Hamblin; S Keel; R L Fabian; T F Deutsch; T Hasan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Lifetime and diffusion of singlet oxygen in a cell.

Authors:  Esben Skovsen; John W Snyder; John D C Lambert; Peter R Ogilby
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Overcoming obstacles in the tumor microenvironment: Recent advancements in nanoparticle delivery for cancer theranostics.

Authors:  Marta Overchuk; Gang Zheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Photonanomedicine: a convergence of photodynamic therapy and nanotechnology.

Authors:  Girgis Obaid; Mans Broekgaarden; Anne-Laure Bulin; Huang-Chiao Huang; Jerrin Kuriakose; Joyce Liu; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 5.  Organic Semiconducting Pro-nanostimulants for Near-Infrared Photoactivatable Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jingchao Li; Dong Cui; Jiaguo Huang; Shasha He; Zebin Yang; Yan Zhang; Yu Luo; Kanyi Pu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Head and neck cancer as a clinical model for molecular targeting of therapy: combining EGFR blockade with radiation.

Authors:  P M Harari; S M Huang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Cancer targeting with biomolecules: a comparative study of photodynamic therapy efficacy using antibody or lectin conjugated phthalocyanine-PEG gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Girgis Obaid; Isabelle Chambrier; Michael J Cook; David A Russell
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Monoclonal antibody cetuximab binds to and down-regulates constitutively activated epidermal growth factor receptor vIII on the cell surface.

Authors:  Dipa Patel; Armin Lahiji; Sheetal Patel; Matthew Franklin; Xenia Jimenez; Daniel J Hicklin; Xiaoqiang Kang
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  The development and characterisation of porphyrin isothiocyanate-monoclonal antibody conjugates for photoimmunotherapy.

Authors:  R Hudson; M Carcenac; K Smith; L Madden; O J Clarke; A Pèlegrin; J Greenman; R W Boyle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Radionuclides transform chemotherapeutics into phototherapeutics for precise treatment of disseminated cancer.

Authors:  Nalinikanth Kotagiri; Matthew L Cooper; Michael Rettig; Christopher Egbulefu; Julie Prior; Grace Cui; Partha Karmakar; Mingzhou Zhou; Xiaoxia Yang; Gail Sudlow; Lynne Marsala; Chantiya Chanswangphuwana; Lan Lu; LeMoyne Habimana-Griffin; Monica Shokeen; Xinming Xu; Katherine Weilbaecher; Michael Tomasson; Gregory Lanza; John F DiPersio; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Membrane composition is a functional determinant of NIR-activable liposomes in orthotopic head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Mina Guirguis; Chanda Bhandari; Junjie Li; Menitte Eroy; Sushant Prajapati; Ryan Margolis; Navadeep Shrivastava; Kenneth Hoyt; Tayyaba Hasan; Girgis Obaid
Journal:  Nanophotonics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 7.923

2.  Forging the Frontiers of Image-Guided Neurosurgery-The Emerging Uses of Theranostics in Neurosurgical Oncology.

Authors:  Fred C Lam; Uyanga Tsedev; Ekkehard M Kasper; Angela M Belcher
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.