Yoshinori Ishii1, Hideo Noguchi2, Junko Sato2, Tetsuya Sakurai2, Shin-Ichi Toyabe3. 1. Ishii Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, 1089 Shimo-Oshi, Gyoda, Saitama, 361-0037, Japan. ishii@sakitama.or.jp. 2. Ishii Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, 1089 Shimo-Oshi, Gyoda, Saitama, 361-0037, Japan. 3. Division of Information Science and Biostatistics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1 Asahimachi Dori Niigata, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Quadriceps strength impairment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to be a concern. However, most studies of quadriceps strength have short-term follow-up periods. Whether quadriceps strength impairment occurs in the long-term follow-up period after TKA remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the quadriceps strength between posterior cruciate ligament-retaining (CR) and substituting (PS) design mobile-bearing TKA (1) in the same patients after an average of 10 years and (2) between TKA patients and age-matched controls. METHODS: A prospective, quasi-randomized design was used. Thirty-four patients (68 knees) who underwent bilateral TKA (CR on one side and PS on the other) were followed for a minimum of 5 years, and 35 age-matched controls (70 knees) were evaluated. A handheld dynamometer was used to measure quadriceps isometric strength. For each patient, the maximum value of three trials was used. The ratio of muscle strength to body weight (MS/BW ratio; N/kg) was used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: The median MS/BW ratio was 3.3 (range 1.4-10.5) for CR 3.4 (range 0.9-9.3) for PS, and 4.6 (range 0.4-8.8) for controls. The MS/BW ratio did not differ between prosthesis designs, but was significantly smaller in both CR (p = 0.020) and PS (p = 0.024) than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKA does not confer a substantial advantage an average of 10 years postoperatively. In addition, quadriceps strength, as measured using a hand-held dynamometer, was significantly lower in both TKA patient groups than in age-matched controls. Clinically, the results of this study indicate that quadriceps-strengthening exercises should be continued in the long term after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE:Quadriceps strength impairment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues to be a concern. However, most studies of quadriceps strength have short-term follow-up periods. Whether quadriceps strength impairment occurs in the long-term follow-up period after TKA remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the quadriceps strength between posterior cruciate ligament-retaining (CR) and substituting (PS) design mobile-bearing TKA (1) in the same patients after an average of 10 years and (2) between TKA patients and age-matched controls. METHODS: A prospective, quasi-randomized design was used. Thirty-four patients (68 knees) who underwent bilateral TKA (CR on one side and PS on the other) were followed for a minimum of 5 years, and 35 age-matched controls (70 knees) were evaluated. A handheld dynamometer was used to measure quadriceps isometric strength. For each patient, the maximum value of three trials was used. The ratio of muscle strength to body weight (MS/BW ratio; N/kg) was used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: The median MS/BW ratio was 3.3 (range 1.4-10.5) for CR 3.4 (range 0.9-9.3) for PS, and 4.6 (range 0.4-8.8) for controls. The MS/BW ratio did not differ between prosthesis designs, but was significantly smaller in both CR (p = 0.020) and PS (p = 0.024) than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKA does not confer a substantial advantage an average of 10 years postoperatively. In addition, quadriceps strength, as measured using a hand-held dynamometer, was significantly lower in both TKA patient groups than in age-matched controls. Clinically, the results of this study indicate that quadriceps-strengthening exercises should be continued in the long term after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: A A Bolanos; W A Colizza; P D McCann; R S Gotlin; M E Wootten; B A Kahn; J N Insall Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Jessica W Smith; Robin L Marcus; Christopher L Peters; Christopher E Pelt; Brian L Tracy; Paul C LaStayo Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Ruud H Knols; Geert Aufdemkampe; Eling D de Bruin; Daniel Uebelhart; Neil K Aaronson Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sravya P Vajapey; Jesse Morris; Andrew I Spitzer; Andrew H Glassman; Nicholas J Greco; Mengnai Li Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Tanner L McGinn; Jennifer I Etcheson; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nicole E George; Nequesha S Mohamed; Jaydev B Mistry; Ugochi Ananaba; Anil Bhave Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2018-06
Authors: Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Hana Ishii; Ryo Ishii; Shin-Ichi Toyabe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 3.390