Literature DB >> 27145774

Proprioception after bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is comparable to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Florian Baumann1, Özkan Bahadin2, Werner Krutsch3, Johannes Zellner3, Michael Nerlich3, Peter Angele3,2, Carsten Oliver Tibesku4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rising expectations in functional performance of total knee joints are inciting further improvement of knee arthroplasty implants. From a patient-centred view, bicruciate-retaining models provide a more natural feeling knee. However, there is no evidence of functional advantage for these implants. The aim of this study was to evaluate balance ability as a measure of proprioception in patients with a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: A prospective, controlled trial was conducted to compare balance ability in 60 patients after arthroplasty of the knee for osteoarthritis. We compared patients with a bicruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty (BCR group) to a control group of patients with a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA group) and another control group of patients with a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS group). The patient population comprised 30 women (50.0 %) and 30 men in three cohorts of 20 each. The mean age was 62.1 ± 8.0 years (range 43-78). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 9 months post-operatively. The evaluation included clinical, radiological, and balance testing-a single-leg stance with eyes closed compared to eyes open. The difference in area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open represents static balance ability after knee arthroplasty.
RESULTS: Perioperative data showed that there was no intra-operative fracture of the intercondylar eminence. There was a decreased post-operative knee extension 9 months post-operative in the BCR group, which was not clinically relevant in any case. We recorded a lower difference in the area of sway between eyes closed and eyes open (ΔA (ec-eo)) for the BCR group (p = 0.01) and the UKA group (p = 0.04) compared to the PS group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found superior static balance ability after preservation of both cruciate ligaments in arthroplasty of the knee, indicating superior proprioceptive function. Hence, BCR implants could provide improved functional properties. Superior proprioceptive function of bicruciate-retaining implants can be an important factor in implant selection. Further prospective, randomized studies to investigate kinematics and long-term survivorship of bicruciate-retaining implants are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA); Outcome; Proprioception; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27145774     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4121-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  The cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty: a kinematic analysis of 2 total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J B Stiehl; R D Komistek; J M Cloutier; D A Dennis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Proprioception with bicondylar sledge prostheses retaining cruciate ligaments.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Carsten Oliver Tibesku; Maike Genkinger; Helmut Laass; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C O Tibesku; D Frisse; M Genkinger; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Balance is an important predictive factor for quality of life and function after primary total knee replacement.

Authors:  I Schwartz; L Kandel; A Sajina; D Litinezki; A Herman; Y Mattan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-06

6.  Results of total knee arthroplasty with a non-constrained prosthesis.

Authors:  J M Cloutier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Balance 1 year after TKA: correlation with clinical variables.

Authors:  Iria Bascuas; Marta Tejero; Sandra Monleón; Roser Boza; Josep Maria Muniesa; Roser Belmonte
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  In vivo kinematics for subjects with and without an anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Richard D Komistek; Jerome Allain; Dylan T Anderson; Douglas A Dennis; Daniel Goutallier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patient preferences in knee prostheses.

Authors:  J W Pritchett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-09

10.  The effects of ACL injury on knee proprioception: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Relph; L Herrington; S Tyson
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.358

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparing single and multi-joint methods to detect knee joint proprioception deficits post primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abderrahman Ouattas; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Nathaniel H Hunt; C Kent Boese; Brian A Knarr
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The role of ligament tension and sensomotoric system in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Michael Tobias Hirschmann; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Analysis of different bicruciate-retaining tibial prosthesis design using a three dimension finite element model.

Authors:  Peiheng He; Xing Li; Shuai Huang; Minghao Liu; Weizhi Chen; Dongliang Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Kinematics of a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Joshua Slane; Geert Peersman; Margo Dirckx; Arne van de Vyver; Philipp Dworschak; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Early results with a bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study.

Authors:  Alessio Biazzo; Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Eric Staals; Francesco Masia; Vincenzo Izzo; Francesco Verde
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-11-19

6.  Native rotational knee kinematics are lost in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty when the tibial component is replaced.

Authors:  Daisuke Hamada; Keizo Wada; Tomoya Takasago; Tomohiro Goto; Akihiro Nitta; Kosaku Higashino; Yoshihiro Fukui; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah A Wilson; Rob Middleton; Simon G F Abram; Stephanie Smith; Abtin Alvand; William F Jackson; Nicholas Bottomley; Sally Hopewell; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-02-21

8.  Arthroscopy combined with unicondylar knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated unicompartmental knee arthritis: A long-term comparison.

Authors:  Hao-Ran Wang; Zhong-Li Li; Ji Li; Yu-Xing Wang; Zhi-Dong Zhao; Wei Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 1.337

9.  Indications for bi-cruciate retaining total knee replacement: An international survey of 346 knee surgeons.

Authors:  Diarmuid De Faoite; Christian Ries; Michelle Foster; Christoph Kolja Boese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.