Literature DB >> 12350255

Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping?

T M Peake1, A M R Terry, P K McGregor, T Dabelsteen.   

Abstract

Animals frequently use signals that travel further than the spacing between individuals. For every intended recipient of a given signal there are likely to be many other individuals that receive information. Eavesdropping on signalling interactions between other individuals provides a relatively cost-free method of assessing future opponents or mates. Male great tits (Parus major) extract relative information from such interactions between individuals unknown to them. Here, we show that male great tits can take information gathering a stage further and obtain more information about a previously unencountered intruder, by the hitherto unknown capability of combining information gathered by eavesdropping with that derived from their own direct interaction with an individual. Prior experience with an intruder (A) was achieved by subjecting a focal male to different levels of intrusion simulated using interactive playback. This intruder (A) then took part in a simulated interaction with an unknown male (B) outside the territorial boundary of the focal males. In response to subsequent intrusion by the second male (B), focal males showed low song output in response to males that had lost to a male that the subject was able to beat. Males of known high quality, or those about which information was ambiguous, elicited a high level of song output by focal males. We discuss the implications of this finding for the evolution of communication and social behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350255      PMCID: PMC1691105          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Cognitive ecology: a field of substance?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans.

Authors:  C Wedekind; M Milinski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Watching fights raises fish hormone levels.

Authors:  R F Oliveira; M Lopes; L A Carneiro; A V Canário
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel J Mennill; Laurene M Ratcliffe; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions.

Authors:  T M Peake; A M Terry; P K McGregor; T Dabelsteen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.

Authors:  M A Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley; Lee Alan Dugatkin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.844

  9 in total
  28 in total

Review 1.  Information and aggression in fishes.

Authors:  Tom M Peake; Peter K McGregor
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 2.  Social eavesdropping and the evolution of conditional cooperation and cheating strategies.

Authors:  Ryan L Earley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney; Liza R Moscovice; Marlies Heesen; Roger Mundry; Robert M Seyfarth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Responses to song playback vary with the vocal performance of both signal senders and receivers.

Authors:  Dana L Moseley; David C Lahti; Jeffrey Podos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Extent and limits of cooperation in animals.

Authors:  Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Social learning of acoustic anti-predator cues occurs between wild bird species.

Authors:  Sara C Keen; Ella F Cole; Michael J Sheehan; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  You talkin' to me? Interactive playback is a powerful yet underused tool in animal communication research.

Authors:  Stephanie L King
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Effects of personality on territory defence in communication networks: a playback experiment with radio-tagged great tits.

Authors:  Mathieu Amy; Philipp Sprau; Piet de Goede; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Triadic social interactions operate across time: a field experiment with wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Roman M Wittig; Catherine Crockford; Kevin E Langergraber; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Nest fidelity is driven by multi-scale information in a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  Alexandre Robert; Vítor H Paiva; Mark Bolton; Frédéric Jiguet; Joël Bried
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.