Literature DB >> 25339716

Prey state shapes the effects of temporal variation in predation risk.

Catherine M Matassa1, Geoffrey C Trussell2.   

Abstract

The ecological impacts of predation risk are influenced by how prey allocate foraging effort across periods of safety and danger. Foraging decisions depend on current danger, but also on the larger temporal, spatial or energetic context in which prey manage their risks of predation and starvation. Using a rocky intertidal food chain, we examined the responses of starved and fed prey (Nucella lapillus dogwhelks) to different temporal patterns of risk from predatory crabs (Carcinus maenas). Prey foraging activity declined during periods of danger, but as dangerous periods became longer, prey state altered the magnitude of risk effects on prey foraging and growth, with likely consequences for community structure (trait-mediated indirect effects on basal resources, Mytilus edulis mussels), prey fitness and trophic energy transfer. Because risk is inherently variable over time and space, our results suggest that non-consumptive predator effects may be most pronounced in productive systems where prey can build energy reserves during periods of safety and then burn these reserves as 'trophic heat' during extended periods of danger. Understanding the interaction between behavioural (energy gain) and physiological (energy use) responses to risk may illuminate the context dependency of trait-mediated trophic cascades and help explain variation in food chain length.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy transfer; food chain length; growth/predation risk trade-off; non-consumptive effect; risk allocation hypothesis; trophic heat

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25339716      PMCID: PMC4213655          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

1.  Simple rules yield complex food webs.

Authors:  R J Williams; N D Martinez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk.

Authors:  Scott Creel; David Christianson; Stewart Liley; John A Winnie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity.

Authors:  E E Werner; B R Anholt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Annual production of two Nova Scotian populations of Nucella lapillus (L.).

Authors:  R N Hughes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Generalized optimal risk allocation: foraging and antipredator behavior in a fluctuating environment.

Authors:  Andrew D Higginson; Tim W Fawcett; Pete C Trimmer; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Trussell; Patrick J Ewanchuk; Catherine M Matassa
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven L Lima; Peter A Bednekoff
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Landscape of fear influences the relative importance of consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects.

Authors:  Catherine M Matassa; Geoffrey C Trussell
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Coping with predator stress: interclonal differences in induction of heat-shock proteins in the water flea Daphnia magna.

Authors:  K Pauwels; R Stoks; L de Meester
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem.

Authors:  Michael R Heithaus; Alejandro Frid; Aaron J Wirsing; Lawrence M Dill; James W Fourqurean; Derek Burkholder; Jordan Thomson; Lars Bejder
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prey state shapes the effects of temporal variation in predation risk.

Authors:  Catherine M Matassa; Geoffrey C Trussell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parental and embryonic experiences with predation risk affect prey offspring behaviour and performance.

Authors:  Sarah C Donelan; Geoffrey C Trussell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Nutritional state reveals complex consequences of risk in a wild predator-prey community.

Authors:  Philip D DeWitt; Matthew S Schuler; Darcy R Visscher; Richard P Thiel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Moving beyond linear food chains: trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Trussell; Catherine M Matassa; Patrick J Ewanchuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Florivory indirectly decreases the plant reproductive output through changes in pollinator attraction.

Authors:  Kaoru Tsuji; Takayuki Ohgushi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Fears from the past? The innate ability of dogs to detect predator scents.

Authors:  Lydia Samuel; Charlotte Arnesen; Andreas Zedrosser; Frank Rosell
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Beaked whales and state-dependent decision-making: how does body condition affect the trade-off between foraging and predator avoidance?

Authors:  Eilidh Siegal; Sascha K Hooker; Saana Isojunno; Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Habitat use by female desert tortoises suggests tradeoffs between resource use and risk avoidance.

Authors:  Melia G Nafus; Jacob A Daly; Tracey D Tuberville; A Peter Klimely; Kurt A Buhlmann; Brian D Todd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Artificial light at night reverses monthly foraging pattern under simulated moonlight.

Authors:  Svenja Tidau; Jack Whittle; Stuart R Jenkins; Thomas W Davies
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.812

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.