Literature DB >> 28701562

Nutritional state reveals complex consequences of risk in a wild predator-prey community.

Philip D DeWitt1,2, Matthew S Schuler3, Darcy R Visscher4, Richard P Thiel5.   

Abstract

Animal populations are regulated by the combined effects of top-down, bottom-up and abiotic processes. Ecologists have struggled to isolate these mechanisms because their effects on prey behaviour, nutrition, security and fitness are often interrelated. We monitored how forage, non-consumptive effects (NCEs), consumptive predation and climatic conditions influenced the demography and nutritional state of a wild prey population during predator recolonization. Combined measures of nutrition, survival and population growth reveal that predators imposed strong effects on the prey population through interacting non-consumptive and consumptive effects, and forage mechanisms. Predation was directly responsible for adult survival, while declining recruitment was attributed to predation risk-sensitive foraging, manifested in poor female nutrition and juvenile recruitment. Substituting nutritional state into the recruitment model through a shared term reveals that predation risk-sensitive foraging was nearly twice as influential as summer forage conditions. Our findings provide a novel, mechanistic insight into the complex means by which predators and forage conditions affect prey populations, and point to a need for more ecological studies that integrate behaviour, nutrition and demography. This line of inquiry can provide further insight into how NCEs interactively contribute to the dynamics of terrestrial prey populations; particularly, how predation risk-sensitive foraging has the potential to stabilize predator-prey coexistence.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  citizen science; climate; non-consumptive effects; population ecology; predator–prey dynamics; wildlife monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701562      PMCID: PMC5524499          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Contrasting distribution and seasonal dynamics of carbohydrate reserves in stem wood of adult ring-porous sessile oak and diffuse-porous beech trees.

Authors:  C Barbaroux; N Bréda
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 2.  Mammal population regulation, keystone processes and ecosystem dynamics.

Authors:  A R E Sinclair
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Complex numerical responses to top-down and bottom-up processes in vertebrate populations.

Authors:  A R E Sinclair; Charles J Krebs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Evan L Preisser; John L Orrock; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Revisiting the classics: considering nonconsumptive effects in textbook examples of predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Barbara L Peckarsky; Peter A Abrams; Daniel I Bolnick; Lawrence M Dill; Jonathan H Grabowski; Barney Luttbeg; John L Orrock; Scott D Peacor; Evan L Preisser; Oswald J Schmitz; Geoffrey C Trussell
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Measuring the impact of dynamic antipredator traits on predator-prey-resource interactions.

Authors:  Peter A Abrams
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Trussell; Patrick J Ewanchuk; Catherine M Matassa
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Estimating the relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces on insect herbivore populations: a classic study revisited.

Authors:  M D Hunter; G C Varley; G R Gradwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The influence of top-down, bottom-up and abiotic factors on the moose (Alces alces) population of Isle Royale.

Authors:  John A Vucetich; Rolf O Peterson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The many faces of fear: comparing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey populations.

Authors:  Evan L Preisser; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fear of predators in free-living wildlife reduces population growth over generations.

Authors:  Marek C Allen; Michael Clinchy; Liana Y Zanette
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.