| Literature DB >> 25338651 |
Maria Cristina Carvalho Espírito-Santo1, Mónica Viviana Alvarado-Mora, Emmanuel Dias-Neto, Lívia Souza Botelho-Lima, João Paulo Moreira, Maria Amorim, Pedro Luiz Silva Pinto, Ashley R Heath, Vera Lúcia Pagliusi Castilho, Elenice Messias do Nascimento Gonçalves, Expedito José de Albuquerque Luna, Flair José Carrilho, João Renato Rebello Pinho, Ronaldo Cesar Borges Gryschek.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis constitutes a major public health problem, and 200 million people are estimated to be infected with schistosomiasis worldwide. In Brazil, schistosomiasis has been reported in 19 states, showing areas of high and medium endemicity and a wide range of areas of low endemicity (ALE). Barra Mansa in Rio de Janeiro state has an estimated prevalence of 1%. ALE represent a new challenge for the helminth control because about 75% of infected individuals are asymptomatic and infections occur with a low parasite load (<100 eggs per gram of feces), causing a decrease in sensitivity of stool parasitological techniques, which are a reference for the laboratory diagnosis of this helminth. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a TaqMan quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) technique in serum and feces DNA samples using the techniques of Kato-Katz (KK), Hoffman, Pons and Janer (HH) as references, during an epidemiological survey using fecal samples and sera from randomized residents from an ALE.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25338651 PMCID: PMC4210485 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-014-0558-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Algorithm of the criteria used to evaluate the results obtained by the TaqMan® Real-Time PCR technique using fecal and serum samples.
-positive infections for each diagnostic technique in samples collected from the sampled population in Barra Mansa/RJ - 2011
| Technique | Positive/Total | % |
|---|---|---|
| KK-HH | 5/572 | 0.9 |
| qPCR-feces | 55/572 | 9.6 |
| qPCR-serum | 8/572 | 1.4 |
KK, Kato-Katz technique.
HH, Hoffman technique.
qPCR-feces-qPCR-feces technique.
qPCR-serum-qPCR-serum technique.
Associations between parasitological tests positive for infection and molecular techniques of the sampled population in the municipality of Barra Mansa/RJ - 2011
| Sample | A | Sex | KK S1 | KK S2 | HH S1 | HH S2 | qPCR Feces | qPCR serum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J.B.S. | 46 | M | 1 egg | 0 | SM | SM | + | - |
| M.C. | 52 | M | 8 eggs | 19 eggs | SM | SM | + | - |
| I.R.S. | 42 | M | 6 eggs | 2 eggs | SM | SM | + | + |
| L.B.A. | 21 | M | 6 eggs | 1egg | - | SM | + | - |
| C.F.S. | 19 | F | 0 | 0 | SM | 0 | - | - |
A, Age.
KK, Kato-Katz technique.
HH, Hoffman technique.
S1, first slide; S2, second slide.
qPCR-feces- qPCR-feces technique.
qPCR-serum- qPCR-serum technique.
SM, positive for Schistosoma mansoni.
Rates of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the diagnostic techniques compared to the parasitological techniques
| Method | Measurement | Estimate (%) | CI 95%minimum | CI 95%maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| qPCR-feces | Sensitivity | 80.0 | 28.4 | 99.5 |
| Specificity | 92.4 | 90.0 | 94.4 | |
| Positive Predictive Value (PPV) | 8.0 | 2.2 | 19.2 | |
| Negative Predictive Value(NPV) | 99.8 | 99.0 | 100.0 | |
| qPCR-serum | Sensitivity | 20.0 | 0.5 | 71.6 |
| Specificity | 98.8 | 97.5 | 99.5 | |
| Positive Predictive Value (PPV) | 12.5 | 0.3 | 52.7 | |
| Negative Predictive Value (NPV) | 99.3 | 98.2 | 99.8 |
Results from positive and undetermined qPCR tests from fecal samples along with Ct values obtained from the sampled population in the municipality of Barra Mansa/RJ - 2011
| Method | Cases/Total | % | Ct values (Log) qPCR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum | |||
| Positive qPCR-feces | 55/572 | 9.6 | 33.6 | 4.9 | 34.8 | 14.7 | 38.8 |
| Undetermined qPCR-feces | 50/572 | 8.7 | 32.3 | 8.5 | 37.1 | 11.5 | 40 |
Results from positive and undetermined qPCR tests from serum samples along with Ct values obtained from the sampled population in the municipality of Barra Mansa/RJ - 2011
| Method | Cases/Total | % | Ct values (Log) qPCR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Median | Minimum | Maximum | |||
| Positive qPCR-serum | 8/572 | 1.4 | 36.9 | 1.3 | 36.3 | 38.8 | 35.2 |
| Undetermined qPCR-serum | 31/572 | 5.4 | 35.5 | 4.4 | 37 | 39.7 | 20.3 |
Agreement among the results obtained by the techniques KK and HH and those obtained by qPCR-serum and qPCR-feces, in fecal and serum samples collected from the sampled population in the municipality of Barra Mansa/RJ - 2011
| Test | KK-HH | Total | p McNemar | Kappa | CI (95%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Positive | |||||||||
| N | % | n | % | n | % | Minimum | Maximum | |||
| qPCR-feces | ||||||||||
| Negative | 549 | (90) | 1 | (0.2) | 550 | 90.2 | <0.001 | 0.110 | 0.008 | 0.212 |
| Positive | 56 | (9.2) | 4 | (0.7) | 60 | 9.8 | ||||
| Total | 605 | (99.2) | 5 | (0.8) | 610 | 100 | ||||
| qPCR-serum | ||||||||||
| Negative | 560 | (97.9) | 4 | (0.7) | 564 | 98.6 | 0.549 | 0.145 | −0.123 | 0.412 |
| Positive | 7 | (1.2) | 1 | (0.2) | 8 | 1.4 | ||||
| Total | 567 | (99.1) | 5 | (0.9) | 572 | 100 | ||||