Literature DB >> 25337409

Estimation of optimal matching position for orthogonal kV setup images and minimal setup margins in radiotherapy of whole breast and lymph node areas.

Marko Laaksomaa1, Mika Kapanen2, Tanja Skyttä1, Seppo Peltola3, Simo Hyödynmaa3, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim was to find an optimal setup image matching position and minimal setup margins to maximally spare the organs at risk in breast radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy of breast cancer is a routine task but has many challenges. We investigated residual position errors in whole breast radiotherapy when orthogonal setup images were matched to different bony landmarks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1111 orthogonal setup image pairs and tangential field images were analyzed retrospectively for 50 consecutive patients. Residual errors in the treatment field images were determined by matching the orthogonal setup images to the vertebrae, sternum, ribs and their compromises. The most important region was the chest wall as it is crucial for the dose delivered to the heart and the ipsilateral lung. Inter-observer variation in online image matching was investigated.
RESULTS: The best general image matching position was the compromise of the vertebrae, ribs and sternum, while the worst position was the vertebrae alone (p ≤ 0.03). The setup margins required for the chest wall varied from 4.3 mm to 5.5 mm in the lung direction while in the superior-inferior (SI) direction the margins varied from 5.1 mm to 7.6 mm. The inter-observer variation increased the minimal margins by approximately 1 mm. The margin of the lymph node areas should be at least 4.8 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Setup margins can be reduced by proper selection of a matching position for the orthogonal setup images. To retain the minimal margins sufficient, systematic error of the chest wall should not exceed 4 mm in the tangential field image.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Free breathing; Image guidance; Radiotherapy; Setup errors; Setup margins

Year:  2014        PMID: 25337409      PMCID: PMC4201775          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  16 in total

1.  Effects of positioning uncertainty and breathing on dose delivery and radiation pneumonitis prediction in breast cancer.

Authors:  Panayiotis Mavroidis; Sofie Axelsson; Simo Hyödynmaa; Juha Rajala; Maunu A Pitkänen; Bengt K Lind; Anders Brahme
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Image-guided radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients: geometrical uncertainty of the heart.

Authors:  Rajko Topolnjak; Gerben R Borst; Jasper Nijkamp; Jan-Jakob Sonke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Breast movement during normal and deep breathing, respiratory training and set up errors: implications for external beam partial breast irradiation.

Authors:  S Chopra; K A Dinshaw; R Kamble; R Sarin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results.

Authors:  Rajko Topolnjak; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Jasper Nijkamp; Coen Rasch; Danny Minkema; Peter Remeijer; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparison of radiotherapy treatment plans for left-sided breast cancer patients based on three- and four-dimensional computed tomography imaging.

Authors:  C Bedi; T Kron; D Willis; P Hubbard; A Milner; B Chua
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.126

6.  Clinical results of image-guided deep inspiration breath hold breast irradiation.

Authors:  Gerben R Borst; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Suzanne den Hollander; Anja Betgen; Peter Remeijer; Aline van Giersbergen; Nicola S Russell; Paula H M Elkhuizen; Harry Bartelink; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Clinical and technological transition in breast cancer.

Authors:  Philip Poortmans; Hugo Marsiglia; Manuel De Las Heras; Manuel Algara
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-09-09

8.  Effects of setup errors and shape changes on breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Anke van Mourik; Simon van Kranen; Suzanne den Hollander; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Marcel van Herk; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Assessment of the residual error in soft tissue setup in patients undergoing partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective study using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Toyosi Fatunase; Zhiheng Wang; Sua Yoo; Jessica L Hubbs; Robert G Prosnitz; Fang-Fang Yin; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation using external beam radiotherapy-A feasibility study based on dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Surega Anbumani; Siddanna R Palled; Girish S Prabhakar; N Arunai Nambiraj; Anchineyan Pichandi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-06-15
View more
  10 in total

1.  Dosimetric feasibility of an "off-breast isocenter" technique for whole-breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Juan-Francisco Calvo-Ortega; Sandra Moragues; Miquel Pozo; Joan Casals
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-08-24

2.  Evaluation of mechanical and geometric accuracy of two different image guidance systems in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nithya Kanakavelu; Anand Mambakam Ravindran; Emmanvelrajan James Jebaseelan Samuel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-01-04

3.  Comparison of set-up errors by breast size on wing board by portal imaging.

Authors:  Waseem Raza; Sushma Agarwal; Koilpillai Joseph Maria Das; Sellepolyam Kaliyaperumal Senthil Kumar; Punita Lal
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-06

4.  Comparison of three differently shaped ROIs in free breathing breast radiotherapy setup using surface guidance with AlignRT®.

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Torsten Moser; Julia Kritz; Kiira Pynnönen; Maija Rossi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-08-12

5.  Determination of the optimal matching position for setup images and minimal setup margins in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast and lymph nodes treated in voluntary deep inhalation breath-hold.

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Mika Kapanen; Mikko Haltamo; Tanja Skyttä; Seppo Peltola; Simo Hyödynmaa; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Dosimetric effects of anatomical deformations and positioning errors in VMAT breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maija Rossi; Eeva Boman; Tanja Skyttä; Mikko Haltamo; Marko Laaksomaa; Mika Kapanen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  AlignRT® and Catalyst™ in whole-breast radiotherapy with DIBH: Is IGRT still needed?

Authors:  Marko Laaksomaa; Sebastian Sarudis; Maija Rossi; Turkka Lehtonen; Jani Pehkonen; Jenny Remes; Helmi Luukkanen; Tanja Skyttä; Mika Kapanen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole-breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sandra Helene Hattel; Peter Andreas Andersen; Isak Hannes Wahlstedt; Sidsel Damkjaer; Arpit Saini; Jakob Borup Thomsen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Feasibility of surface guided radiotherapy for patient positioning in breast radiotherapy versus conventional tattoo-based setups- a systematic review.

Authors:  Wesley Naidoo; Michelle Leech
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-16

10.  Evaluation of  interfraction setup variations for  postmastectomy radiation therapy using EPID-based in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  Shengwei Kang; Jie Li; Jiabao Ma; Wei Zhang; Xiongfei Liao; Hou Qing; Tingqiang Tan; Xin Xin; Bin Tang; Angelo Piermattei; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.