Literature DB >> 25337262

Effect of Gleason scores of lymph node metastases on prognosis of patients with prostate cancer.

Kyungtae Ko1, In Gab Jeong2, Woo Suk Choi3, Ju Hyun Lim2, Ja Hee Suh4, Ja Hyeon Ku3, Yangsoon Park5, Kyung Cheol Moon4, Hyeon Hoe Kim3, Choung-Soo Kim2, Cheol Kwak3.   

Abstract

The long-term mortality risk from prostate cancer increases in lymph node (LN) positive patients. This study was done to assess the effect of lymph node Gleason score (LNGS) on prognosis in patients with LN-positive prostate cancer. Among the 1,415 patients who received pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), 117 (8.4%) patients had a positive LN. The PGS of the prostate specimens and the LNGS of the positive LNs were assessed by uropathologists. The median age of patients at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62-71 years) and the median follow-up duration was 44.3 months (IQR, 27.0-78.5 months). Pathologic Gleason scores (PGS) of 6-9 included one (0.9%), 53 (49.5%), 22 (20.6%), and 31 (29.0%) patients. The median total number of retrieved LNs was 9.0 (IQR, 5.3-12.8). The median number of positive LNs was one (IQR, 1-2). Cancer architecture with a Gleason pattern and score were observed in LNs as in ordinary prostate specimens. LNGS 6-9 included nine (8.1%), 57 (51.4%), 31 (27.9%), and 14 (12.6%) patients. The speaman's analysis showed the meaningful correlation between PGS and LNGS (P = 0.249, P = 0.011). The univariate analysis showed that the number of positive LNs and LNGS were significantly associated with prostate cancer-specific survival (P = 0.028; P = 0.005). The same architecture that is seen in the prostate was seen in positive LNs, and LNGS may be a significant prognostic factor in patients with LN-positive prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; lymph node metastasis; prognosis; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25337262      PMCID: PMC4203233     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  29 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason patterns of higher grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a proposal to modify the Gleason grading system.

Authors:  C C Pan; S R Potter; A W Partin; J I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Competing mortality contributes to excess mortality in patients with poor-risk lymph node-positive prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Albrecht Scholz; Rainer Koch; Oliver W Hakenberg; Gustavo B Baretton; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging.

Authors:  D F Gleason; G T Mellinger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Patrick C Walsh; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; David P Wood; James A Eastham; Ofer Yossepowitch; Danny M Rabah; Michael W Kattan; Changhong Yu; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Dedifferentiation in the metastatic progression of prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  L Cheng; J Slezak; E J Bergstralh; J C Cheville; S Sweat; H Zincke; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy in Korean men with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ja Hyeon Ku; Chang Wook Jeong; Yong Hyun Park; Min Chul Cho; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Darren E Whittemore; Eric J Hick; Mark R Carter; Judd W Moul; Alejandro J Miranda-Sousa; Wade J Sexton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The association between total and positive lymph node counts, and disease progression in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Fernando J Bianco; Andrew J Vickers; Christopher J DiBlasio; Paul A Fearn; Farhang Rabbani; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Good outcome for patients with few lymph node metastases after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Martin C Schumacher; Fiona C Burkhard; George N Thalmann; Achim Fleischmann; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Survival in surgically treated, nodal positive prostate cancer patients is predicted by histopathological characteristics of the primary tumor and its lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Achim Fleischmann; Sylviane Schobinger; Martin Schumacher; George N Thalmann; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transcriptome analysis reveals a long non-coding RNA signature to improve biochemical recurrence prediction in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jinyuan Xu; Yujia Lan; Fulong Yu; Shiwei Zhu; Jianrong Ran; Jiali Zhu; Hongyi Zhang; Lili Li; Shujun Cheng; Yun Xiao; Xia Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-18

2.  High concordance of TMPRSS-ERG fusion between primary prostate cancer and its lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Franziska Brandi; Katharina Grupp; Claudia Hube-Magg; Martina Kluth; Dagmar Lang; Sarah Minner; Christina Möller-Koop; Markus Graefen; Hans Heinzer; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Corinna Wittmer; Frank Jacobsen; Hartwig Huland; Stefan Steurer; Patrick Lebok; Andrea Hinsch; Waldemar Wilczak; Thorsten Schlomm; Ronald Simon
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.