BACKGROUND: Dedifferentiation is a distinctive feature of cancer progression. Detailed histologic analysis of primary prostate carcinoma and synchronous lymph node metastases may improve our understanding of the complex process of cancer progression and metastasis. METHODS: The authors studied 242 regional lymph node positive prostate carcinoma patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy between 1987 and 1992 at the Mayo Clinic. Patients ranged in age from 47-79 years (median, 66 years). The median follow-up was 6.1 years. Gleason scores of lymph node metastases and primary tumors were compared and correlated with systemic disease progression. Histologic dedifferentiation was defined as a higher Gleason grade in the lymph node metastases than in the primary tumor. Systemic disease progression was defined as the presence of distant metastases documented by biopsies, abdominal computed tomography, plain radiograph, or bone scan. RESULTS: The 5-year systemic progression free survival (PFS) rate was 90%. The Gleason score in the lymph node metastases was higher than in the primary tumor in 45% of patients, lower in 12% of patients, and matched exactly in 43% of patients. The 5-year PFS was significantly different between patients with histologic dedifferentiation (88% +/- 3) and those without dedifferentiation (94% +/- 2) (P = 0.04). Adjusting for the Gleason grade of the primary tumor and total lymph node tumor volume, the relative risk for disease progression associated with dedifferentiation was 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-4.7; P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study demonstrate the morphologic heterogeneity of metastases from prostate carcinoma. There is a trend toward histologic dedifferentiation when prostate carcinoma metastasizes to regional lymph nodes. This dedifferentiation, although univariately significant, was not associated with disease progression when adjusted for lymph node tumor volume. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Dedifferentiation is a distinctive feature of cancer progression. Detailed histologic analysis of primary prostate carcinoma and synchronous lymph node metastases may improve our understanding of the complex process of cancer progression and metastasis. METHODS: The authors studied 242 regional lymph node positive prostate carcinomapatients who underwent radical prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy between 1987 and 1992 at the Mayo Clinic. Patients ranged in age from 47-79 years (median, 66 years). The median follow-up was 6.1 years. Gleason scores of lymph node metastases and primary tumors were compared and correlated with systemic disease progression. Histologic dedifferentiation was defined as a higher Gleason grade in the lymph node metastases than in the primary tumor. Systemic disease progression was defined as the presence of distant metastases documented by biopsies, abdominal computed tomography, plain radiograph, or bone scan. RESULTS: The 5-year systemic progression free survival (PFS) rate was 90%. The Gleason score in the lymph node metastases was higher than in the primary tumor in 45% of patients, lower in 12% of patients, and matched exactly in 43% of patients. The 5-year PFS was significantly different between patients with histologic dedifferentiation (88% +/- 3) and those without dedifferentiation (94% +/- 2) (P = 0.04). Adjusting for the Gleason grade of the primary tumor and total lymph node tumor volume, the relative risk for disease progression associated with dedifferentiation was 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 0.7-4.7; P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study demonstrate the morphologic heterogeneity of metastases from prostate carcinoma. There is a trend toward histologic dedifferentiation when prostate carcinoma metastasizes to regional lymph nodes. This dedifferentiation, although univariately significant, was not associated with disease progression when adjusted for lymph node tumor volume. Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Giampiero Giovacchini; Elena Incerti; Paola Mapelli; Margarita Kirienko; Alberto Briganti; Giorgio Gandaglia; Francesco Montorsi; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Edith D Canby-Hagino; Gregory P Swanson; E David Crawford; Joseph W Basler; Javier Hernandez; Ian M Thompson Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 2.862
Authors: Mitchell E Fane; Yash Chhabra; David E J Hollingsworth; Jacinta L Simmons; Loredana Spoerri; Tae Gyu Oh; Jagat Chauhan; Toby Chin; Lachlan Harris; Tracey J Harvey; George E O Muscat; Colin R Goding; Richard A Sturm; Nikolas K Haass; Glen M Boyle; Michael Piper; Aaron G Smith Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 8.143