PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between drusen areas measured with color fundus images (CFIs) and those with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). METHODS: Forty-two eyes from thirty patients with drusen in the absence of geographic atrophy were recruited to a prospective study. Digital color fundus images and SDOCT images were obtained at baseline and at follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. Registered, matched circles centered on the fovea with diameters of 3 mm and 5 mm were identified on both CFIs and SDOCT images. Spectral-domain OCT drusen measurements were obtained using a commercially available proprietary algorithm. Drusen boundaries on CFIs were traced manually at the Doheny Eye Institute Image Reading Center. RESULTS: Mean square root drusen area (SQDA) measurements for the 3-mm circles on the SDOCT images were 1.451 mm at baseline and 1.464 mm at week 26, whereas the measurements on CFIs were 1.555 mm at baseline and 1.584 mm at week 26. Mean SQDA measurements from CFIs were larger than those from the SDOCT measurements at all time points (P = 0.004 at baseline, P = 0.003 at 26 weeks). Changes in SQDA over 26 weeks measured with SDOCT were not different from those measured with CFIs (mean difference = 0.014 mm, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Spectral-domain OCT drusen area measurements were smaller than the measurements obtained from CFIs. However, there were no differences in the change in drusen area over time between the two imaging modalities. Spectral-domain OCT measurements were considerably more sensitive in assessing drusen area changes. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between drusen areas measured with color fundus images (CFIs) and those with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). METHODS: Forty-two eyes from thirty patients with drusen in the absence of geographic atrophy were recruited to a prospective study. Digital color fundus images and SDOCT images were obtained at baseline and at follow-up visits at 3 and 6 months. Registered, matched circles centered on the fovea with diameters of 3 mm and 5 mm were identified on both CFIs and SDOCT images. Spectral-domain OCT drusen measurements were obtained using a commercially available proprietary algorithm. Drusen boundaries on CFIs were traced manually at the Doheny Eye Institute Image Reading Center. RESULTS: Mean square root drusen area (SQDA) measurements for the 3-mm circles on the SDOCT images were 1.451 mm at baseline and 1.464 mm at week 26, whereas the measurements on CFIs were 1.555 mm at baseline and 1.584 mm at week 26. Mean SQDA measurements from CFIs were larger than those from the SDOCT measurements at all time points (P = 0.004 at baseline, P = 0.003 at 26 weeks). Changes in SQDA over 26 weeks measured with SDOCT were not different from those measured with CFIs (mean difference = 0.014 mm, P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Spectral-domain OCT drusen area measurements were smaller than the measurements obtained from CFIs. However, there were no differences in the change in drusen area over time between the two imaging modalities. Spectral-domain OCT measurements were considerably more sensitive in assessing drusen area changes. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Fenghua Wang; Philip J Rosenfeld; Fernando M Penha; William J Feuer; Giovanni Gregori Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Giovanni Gregori; SriniVas R Sadda; Fernando M Penha; Raquel Goldhardt; Muneeswar G Nittala; Ranjith K Konduru; William J Feuer; Pooja Gupta; Ying Li; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Giovanni Gregori; Fenghua Wang; Philip J Rosenfeld; Zohar Yehoshua; Ninel Z Gregori; Brandon J Lujan; Carmen A Puliafito; William J Feuer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-03-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Yogesan Kanagasingam; Alauddin Bhuiyan; Michael D Abràmoff; R Theodore Smith; Leonard Goldschmidt; Tien Y Wong Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Frederick L Ferris; C P Wilkinson; Alan Bird; Usha Chakravarthy; Emily Chew; Karl Csaky; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jessica N Leuschen; Stefanie G Schuman; Katrina P Winter; Michelle N McCall; Wai T Wong; Emily Y Chew; Thomas Hwang; Sunil Srivastava; Neeru Sarin; Traci Clemons; Molly Harrington; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-09-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Graham F Merry; Marion R Munk; Robert S Dotson; Michael G Walker; Robert G Devenyi Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Xiaoshuang Jiang; Mengxi Shen; Liang Wang; Luis de Sisternes; Mary K Durbin; William Feuer; Philip J Rosenfeld; Giovanni Gregori Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Muneeswar G Nittala; Yeunjoo E Song; Rebecca Sardell; Larry D Adams; Samuel Pan; Swetha B Velaga; Violet Horst; Debra Dana; Laura Caywood; Renee Laux; Denise Fuzzell; Sarada Fuzzell; William K Scott; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Robert P Igo; Jonathan Haines; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; SriniVas R Sadda; Dwight Stambolian Journal: Retina Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.975
Authors: Maximilian W M Wintergerst; Thomas Schultz; Johannes Birtel; Alexander K Schuster; Norbert Pfeiffer; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Frank G Holz; Robert P Finger Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Johanna M Seddon; James P Dossett; Rafael Widjajahakim; Bernard Rosner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799