| Literature DB >> 27989012 |
Graham F Merry1, Marion R Munk2, Robert S Dotson1, Michael G Walker3, Robert G Devenyi4,5,6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) treatment for patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Entities:
Keywords: age-related macular degeneration; contrast; drusen; photobiomodulation; sensitivity; visual acuity
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27989012 PMCID: PMC5484346 DOI: 10.1111/aos.13354
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Ophthalmol ISSN: 1755-375X Impact factor: 3.761
Figure 1Representative images from two different patients showing characteristic pathologic changes. Semi‐automated segmentation in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and geographic atrophy (GA) assessment in fundus autofluorescence (FAF) were performed. The left image (A) displays a representative drusen volume map of an AREDS 3 patient. Colour bars indicate ascending thickness values starting with 0 μm (black). The image in the middle (B) demonstrates the drusen alignment in one representative OCT section scan of the same patient. The right image (C) illustrates the assessment of the GA area using FAF at 488 nm wavelength in a patient with central involving GA of an AREDS 4 patient. The GA is measured by manually marking the area of homogenous hypo‐autofluorescence using the inbuilt Heidelberg software (yellow line).
Baseline Disease Distribution according to AREDS Classification, and Study Outcome Measures
| Baseline disease distribution according to AREDS classification | |
|---|---|
| AREDS classification | Number of eyes (%) |
| AREDS 2 | 9 (21%) |
| AREDS 3 | 20 (48%) |
| AREDS 4 | 13 (31%) |
| GA | 13 (31%) |
| RPD | 28 (67%) |
| Baseline clinical and functional outcome measures | |
| Study variables at BL (units) | Mean ± SD |
| ETDRS (letters) | 86.29 ± 11.36 |
| CS 1.5 CPD (log CS) | 1.36 ± 0.17 |
| CS 3.0 CPD (log CS) | 1.50 ± 0.23 |
| CS 6.0 CPD (log CS) | 1.54 ± 0.20 |
| Drusen volume (mm3) | 0.46 ± 0.14 |
| Central drusen thickness ( | 35.12 ± 36.58 |
| GA area (mm2) | 7.01 ± 5.22 |
| CRT ( | 278.67 ± 47.60 |
| RV (mm3) | 8.04 ± 0.78 |
RPD = reticular pseudodrusen, SD = standard deviation, ETDRS = early treatment diabetic retinopathy study, CS = contrast sensitivity, CPD = cycles per degree, log CS = log contrast sensitivity, GA = geographic atrophy, CRT = central retinal thickness, RV = retinal volume.
Summary table of results
| Measure | Comparison | Letter score increase | p‐value |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA letter score | BL to V1 | +5.90 | <0.001 |
| BCVA letter score | BL to V2 | +5.14 | <0.001 |
| Measure | Comparison | Log CS increase | p‐value |
| CS 1.5 CPD | BL to V1 | +0.102 | 0.0113 |
| CS 1.5 CPD | BL to V2 | +0.080 | 0.0558 |
| CS 3.0 CPD | BL to V1 | +0.109 | 0.0224 |
| CS 3.0 CPD | BL to V2 | +0.166 | 0.0155 |
| CS 6.0 CPD | BL to V1 | +0.117 | 0.0029 |
| CS 6.0 CPD | BL to V2 | +0.10 | 0.0360 |
| Measure | Comparison | mm3 decrease | p‐value |
| Drusen volume | BL to V1 | −0.024 | <0.001 |
| Drusen volume | BL to V2 | −0.029 | 0.0206 |
| Measure | Comparison |
| p‐value |
| Central drusen thickness | BL to V1 | −3.78 | <0.001 |
| Central drusen thickness | BL to V2 | −0.34 | 0.8781 |
| CRT | BL to V1 | −0.36 | 0.6872 |
| CRT | BL to V2 | 3.39 | 0.1422 |
| GA area | Comparison | mm change | p‐value |
| GA square root | BL to V1 | −0.021 | 0.2043 |
| GA square root | BL to V2 | 0.026 | 0.1618 |
| Measure | Comparison | mm3 decrease | p‐value |
| RV | BL to V1 | −0.066 | 0.1133 |
| RV | BL to V2 | −0.049 | 0.4639 |
BL = baseline, GA = geographic atrophy, early treatment diabetic retinopathy study letter score (BCVA = best‐corrected visual acuity), CS = contrast sensitivity at 1.5, 3.0 and 6.0 cycles per degree (CPD, log units), drusen volume reduction (mm3), central retinal drusen thickness (μm), retinal volume (RV, mm3) and central retinal thickness (CRT, μm).
Figure 2(A) Photobiomodulation (PBM) leads to significant improvement in early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) letter score (absolute plot – jitter) in individual subjects. The bold dotted line indicates the overall mean. (B) Contrast sensitivity (CS; 3.0 CPD) in logCS change from baseline (BL) following PBM treatment (absolute plot – jitter) in individual subjects. The bold dotted line indicates the overall mean. (C) This panel indicates the percentage of eyes presenting with one, two and three line ETDRS letter gain at visit 1 ( = immediate post‐treatment, 3 weeks after BL). (D) Drusen volume measurements in mm3 change from BL following PBM treatment (absolute plot – jitter) in individual subjects. The bold dotted line indicates the overall mean.
Figure 3Visual acuity change in magnitude categorized by baseline (BL) VA scores. Eyes with a BL VA letter score of between 70 and 89 (Snellen equivalent of 20/80–20/32) appeared to respond to photobiomodulation treatment with a high percentage gaining greater than five letters. Eyes with lower (60–69 letters) or higher (≥90 letters) BL VA letter score were less likely to gain more than five letters.
Figure 4Representative example of an eye categorized as AREDS 3 with mainly convex, homogenous and low reflective drusen larger than 125 μm. Baseline (Top) shows a drusen volume of 0.39 mm3 with a mean central 1‐mm drusen with thickness of 29 μm. Black numbers indicate the mean drusen thickness of each early treatment diabetic retinopathy study subgrid and red numbers indicate the corresponding drusen volume (mm3). Bottom: Follow‐up examination at visit 1. Overall drusen volume as well as mean central drusen thickness has significantly decreased without new formation of geographic atrophy or disruption of the photoreceptor layers.
Figure 5An individual cut segmented subtraction scan showing significant drusen regression at 3 months following the treatment course.