Literature DB >> 25333823

Locomotion in extinct giant kangaroos: were sthenurines hop-less monsters?

Christine M Janis1, Karalyn Buttrill1, Borja Figueirido2.   

Abstract

Sthenurine kangaroos (Marsupialia, Diprotodontia, Macropodoidea) were an extinct subfamily within the family Macropodidae (kangaroos and rat-kangaroos). These "short-faced browsers" first appeared in the middle Miocene, and radiated in the Plio-Pleistocene into a diversity of mostly large-bodied forms, more robust than extant forms in their build. The largest (Procoptodon goliah) had an estimated body mass of 240 kg, almost three times the size of the largest living kangaroos, and there is speculation whether a kangaroo of this size would be biomechanically capable of hopping locomotion. Previously described aspects of sthenurine anatomy (specialized forelimbs, rigid lumbar spine) would limit their ability to perform the characteristic kangaroo pentapedal walking (using the tail as a fifth limb), an essential gait at slower speeds as slow hopping is energetically unfeasible. Analysis of limb bone measurements of sthenurines in comparison with extant macropodoids shows a number of anatomical differences, especially in the large species. The scaling of long bone robusticity indicates that sthenurines are following the "normal" allometric trend for macropodoids, while the large extant kangaroos are relatively gracile. Other morphological differences are indicative of adaptations for a novel type of locomotor behavior in sthenurines: they lacked many specialized features for rapid hopping, and they also had anatomy indicative of supporting their body with an upright trunk (e.g., dorsally tipped ischiae), and of supporting their weight on one leg at a time (e.g., larger hips and knees, stabilized ankle joint). We propose that sthenurines adopted a bipedal striding gait (a gait occasionally observed in extant tree-kangaroos): in the smaller and earlier forms, this gait may have been employed as an alternative to pentapedal locomotion at slower speeds, while in the larger Pleistocene forms this gait may have enabled them to evolve to body sizes where hopping was no longer a feasible form of more rapid locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25333823      PMCID: PMC4198187          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  20 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical consequences of scaling.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  An arid-adapted middle Pleistocene vertebrate fauna from south-central Australia.

Authors:  Gavin J Prideaux; John A Long; Linda K Ayliffe; John C Hellstrom; Brad Pillans; Walter E Boles; Mark N Hutchinson; Richard G Roberts; Matthew L Cupper; Lee J Arnold; Paul D Devine; Natalie M Warburton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Hind limb scaling of kangaroos and wallabies (superfamily Macropodoidea): implications for hopping performance, safety factor and elastic savings.

Authors:  C P McGowan; J Skinner; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running.

Authors:  J Nilsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1989-06

5.  Morphology and locomotor adaptations of the bovid femur in relation to habitat.

Authors:  J Kappelman
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Morphological variation of the thoracolumbar vertebrae in Macropodidae and its functional relevance.

Authors:  Xinmin Chen; Nick Milne; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Scaling of elastic strain energy in kangaroos and the benefits of being big.

Authors:  M B Bennett; G C Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Modelling digestive constraints in non-ruminant and ruminant foregut-fermenting mammals.

Authors:  Adam J Munn; W Jürgen Streich; Jürgen Hummel; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 2.320

9.  Locomotion energetics and gait characteristics of a rat-kangaroo, Bettongia penicillata, have some kangaroo-like features.

Authors:  K N Webster; T J Dawson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Energetic cost of locomotion as a function of ambient temperature and during growth in the marsupial Potorous tridactylus.

Authors:  R V Baudinette; E A Halpern; D S Hinds
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  10 in total

1.  Scaling of the ankle extensor muscle-tendon units and the biomechanical implications for bipedal hopping locomotion in the post-pouch kangaroo Macropus fuliginosus.

Authors:  Edward P Snelling; Andrew A Biewener; Qiaohui Hu; David A Taggart; Andrea Fuller; Duncan Mitchell; Shane K Maloney; Roger S Seymour
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The extraordinary osteology and functional morphology of the limbs in Palorchestidae, a family of strange extinct marsupial giants.

Authors:  Hazel L Richards; Rod T Wells; Alistair R Evans; Erich M G Fitzgerald; Justin W Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Introduced herbivores restore Late Pleistocene ecological functions.

Authors:  Erick J Lundgren; Daniel Ramp; John Rowan; Owen Middleton; Simon D Schowanek; Oscar Sanisidro; Scott P Carroll; Matt Davis; Christopher J Sandom; Jens-Christian Svenning; Arian D Wallach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Changes in shape and cross-sectional geometry in the tibia of mice selectively bred for increases in relative bone length.

Authors:  Miranda N Cosman; Leah M Sparrow; Campbell Rolian
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  A bipedal mammalian model for spinal cord injury research: The tammar wallaby.

Authors:  Norman R Saunders; Katarzyna M Dziegielewska; Sophie C Whish; Lyn A Hinds; Benjamin J Wheaton; Yifan Huang; Steve Henry; Mark D Habgood
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-06-15

6.  Limb bone scaling in hopping macropods and quadrupedal artiodactyls.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Alessandro A Felder; Melissa Y Chua; Kalyani Lodhia; Michał M Kłosowski; John R Hutchinson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  An eye for a tooth: Thylacosmilus was not a marsupial "saber-tooth predator".

Authors:  Christine M Janis; Borja Figueirido; Larisa DeSantis; Stephan Lautenschlager
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Divergent locomotor evolution in "giant" kangaroos: Evidence from foot bone bending resistances and microanatomy.

Authors:  Amber Y Wagstaffe; Adrian M O'Driscoll; Callum J Kunz; Emily J Rayfield; Christine M Janis
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 1.966

9.  Extinction of eastern Sahul megafauna coincides with sustained environmental deterioration.

Authors:  Scott A Hocknull; Richard Lewis; Lee J Arnold; Tim Pietsch; Renaud Joannes-Boyau; Gilbert J Price; Patrick Moss; Rachel Wood; Anthony Dosseto; Julien Louys; Jon Olley; Rochelle A Lawrence
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The anatomy of a crushing bite: The specialised cranial mechanics of a giant extinct kangaroo.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.