Literature DB >> 12905005

Locomotion energetics and gait characteristics of a rat-kangaroo, Bettongia penicillata, have some kangaroo-like features.

K N Webster1, T J Dawson.   

Abstract

The locomotory characteristics of kangaroos and wallabies are unusual, with both energetic costs and gait parameters differing from those of quadrupedal running mammals. The kangaroos and wallabies have an evolutionary history of only around 5 million years; their closest relatives, the rat-kangaroos, have a fossil record of more than 26 million years. We examined the locomotory characteristics of a rat-kangaroo, Bettongia penicillata. Locomotory energetics and gait parameters were obtained from animals exercising on a motorised treadmill at speeds from 0.6 m s(-1) to 6.2 m s(-1). Aerobic metabolic costs increased as hopping speed increased, but were significantly different from the costs for a running quadruped; at the fastest speed, the cost of hopping was 50% of the cost of running. Therefore B. penicillata can travel much faster than quadrupedal runners at similar levels of aerobic output. The maximum aerobic output of B. penicillata was 17 times its basal metabolism. Increases in speed during hopping were achieved through increases in stride length, with stride frequency remaining constant. We suggest that these unusual locomotory characteristics are a conservative feature among the hopping marsupials, with an evolutionary history of 20-30 million years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12905005     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-003-0364-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  25 in total

1.  Energetic cost of locomotion in Australian hopping mice.

Authors:  T J Sawson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Energetic cost of locomotion in the tammar wallaby.

Authors:  R V Baudinette; G K Snyder; P B Frappell
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-05

3.  Determination of oxygen consumption by use of the paramagnetic oxygen analyzer.

Authors:  R W Hill
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; K Schmidt-Nielsen; J L Raab
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-10

5.  Design of the mammalian respiratory system. III Scaling maximum aerobic capacity to body mass: wild and domestic mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; G M Maloiy; E R Weibel; V A Langman; J M Kamau; H J Seeherman; N C Heglund
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1981-04

6.  The energetic cost of bipedal hopping in small mammals.

Authors:  S D Thompson; R E MacMillen; E M Burke; C R Taylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Energetics and biomechanics of locomotion by red kangaroos (Macropus rufus).

Authors:  R Kram; T J Dawson
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait?

Authors:  N C Heglund; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Maximum metabolism and the aerobic factorial scope of endotherms.

Authors:  D S Hinds; R V Baudinette; R E MacMillen; E A Halpern
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. I. Metabolic energy consumption as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals.

Authors:  C R Taylor; N C Heglund; G M Maloiy
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Myosin isoforms and fibre types in limb muscles of Australian marsupials: adaptations to hopping and non-hopping locomotion.

Authors:  Wendy W H Zhong; Christine A Lucas; Joseph F Y Hoh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Inter-stride variability triggers gait transitions in mammals and birds.

Authors:  Michael C Granatosky; Caleb M Bryce; Jandy Hanna; Aidan Fitzsimons; Myra F Laird; Kelsey Stilson; Christine E Wall; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Locomotion in extinct giant kangaroos: were sthenurines hop-less monsters?

Authors:  Christine M Janis; Karalyn Buttrill; Borja Figueirido
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Scaling of the ankle extensor muscle-tendon units and the biomechanical implications for bipedal hopping locomotion in the post-pouch kangaroo Macropus fuliginosus.

Authors:  Edward P Snelling; Andrew A Biewener; Qiaohui Hu; David A Taggart; Andrea Fuller; Duncan Mitchell; Shane K Maloney; Roger S Seymour
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Functional morphology of the ankle extensor muscle-tendon units in the springhare Pedetes capensis shows convergent evolution with macropods for bipedal hopping locomotion.

Authors:  Gabriela N Veiga; Andrew A Biewener; Andrea Fuller; Tanja M F N van de Ven; Craig P McGowan; Wendy Panaino; Edward P Snelling
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.921

6.  Terrestrial locomotion energy costs vary considerably between species: no evidence that this is explained by rate of leg force production or ecology.

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey; Craig R White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The energy allocation trade-offs underlying life history traits in hypometabolic strepsirhines and other primates.

Authors:  Bruno Simmen; Luca Morino; Stéphane Blanc; Cécile Garcia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Forelimb preferences in quadrupedal marsupials and their implications for laterality evolution in mammals.

Authors:  Andrey Giljov; Karina Karenina; Yegor Malashichev
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Does bipedality predict the group-level manual laterality in mammals?

Authors:  Andrey Giljov; Karina Karenina; Yegor Malashichev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.