Literature DB >> 2782094

Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running.

J Nilsson1, A Thorstensson.   

Abstract

In this study the variation in ground reaction force parameters was investigated with respect to adaptations to speed and mode of progression, and to type of foot-strike. Twelve healthy male subjects were studied during walking (1.0-3.0 m s-1) and running (1.5-6.0 m s-1). The subjects were selected with respect to foot-strike pattern during running. Six subjects were classified as rearfoot strikers and six as forefoot strikers. Constant speeds were accomplished by pacer lights beside an indoor straightway and controlled by means of a photo-electronic device. The vertical, anteroposterior and mediolateral force components were recorded with a force platform. Computer software was used to calculate durations, amplitudes and impulses of the reaction forces. The amplitudes were normalized with respect to body weight (b.w.). Increased speed was accompanied by shorter force periods and larger peak forces. The peak amplitude of the vertical reaction force in walking and running increased with speed from approximately 1.0 to 1.5 b.w. and 2.0 to 2.9 b.w. respectively. The anteroposterior peak force and mediolateral peak-to-peak force increased about 2 times with speed in walking and about 2-4 times in running (the absolute values were on average about 10 times smaller than the vertical). The transition from walking to running resulted in a shorter support phase duration and a change in the shape of the vertical reaction force curve. The vertical peak force increased whereas the vertical impulse and the anteroposterior impulses and peak forces decreased. In running the vertical force showed an impact peak at touch-down among the rearfoot strikers but generally not among the forefoot strikers. The first mediolateral force peak was laterally directed (as in walking) for the rearfoot strikers but medially for the forefoot strikers. Thus, there is a change with speed in the complex interaction between vertical and horizontal forces needed for propulsion and equilibrium during human locomotion. The differences present between walking and running are consequences of fundamental differences in motor strategies between the two major forms of human progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2782094     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08655.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6772


  106 in total

1.  Effects of forefoot running on chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a case series.

Authors:  Angela R Diebal; Robert Gregory; Curtis Alitz; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Acute effects of plyometric jumping and intermittent running on serum bone markers in young males.

Authors:  Che-Fu Lin; Tsang-hai Huang; Kuo-Cheng Tu; Linda L Lin; Yi-Hsuan Tu; Rong-Sen Yang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Dynamics of longitudinal arch support in relation to walking speed: contribution of the plantar aponeurosis.

Authors:  Paolo Caravaggi; Todd Pataky; Michael Günther; Russell Savage; Robin Crompton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Effect of surgery to implant motion and force sensors on vertical ground reaction forces in the ovine model.

Authors:  Safa T Herfat; Jason T Shearn; Denis L Bailey; R Michael Greiwe; Marc T Galloway; Cindi Gooch; David L Butler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  The independent effects of speed and propulsive force on joint power generation in walking.

Authors:  Michael G Browne; Jason R Franz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Effect of a robotic restraint gait training versus robotic conventional gait training on gait parameters in stroke patients.

Authors:  Céline Bonnyaud; Raphael Zory; Julien Boudarham; Didier Pradon; Djamel Bensmail; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Lower body negative pressure treadmill exercise as a countermeasure for bed rest-induced bone loss in female identical twins.

Authors:  Sara R Zwart; Alan R Hargens; Stuart M C Lee; Brandon R Macias; Donald E Watenpaugh; Kevin Tse; Scott M Smith
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Evaluation of measurements of propulsion used to reflect changes in walking speed in individuals poststroke.

Authors:  HaoYuan Hsiao; Thomas M Zabielski; Jacqueline A Palmer; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mouse incising central pattern generator: Characteristics and modulation by pain.

Authors:  Charles G Widmer; Joyce Morris-Wiman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-08-25

10.  Effects of exercise on bone mineral density in calcium-replete postmenopausal women with and without hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Scott Going; Timothy Lohman; Linda Houtkooper; Lauve Metcalfe; Hilary Flint-Wagner; Robert Blew; Vanessa Stanford; Ellen Cussler; Jane Martin; Pedro Teixeira; Margaret Harris; Laura Milliken; Arturo Figueroa-Galvez; Judith Weber
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.