Literature DB >> 25333309

Estimating liver perfusion from free-breathing continuously acquired dynamic gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction.

Hersh Chandarana1, Tobias Kai Block, Justin Ream, Artem Mikheev, Samuel H Sigal, Ricardo Otazo, Henry Rusinek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to estimate perfusion metrics in healthy and cirrhotic liver with pharmacokinetic modeling of high-temporal resolution reconstruction of continuously acquired free-breathing gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced acquisition in patients undergoing clinically indicated liver magnetic resonance imaging. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study, 9 cirrhotic and 10 noncirrhotic patients underwent clinical magnetic resonance imaging, which included continuously acquired radial stack-of-stars 3-dimensional gradient recalled echo sequence with golden-angle ordering scheme in free breathing during contrast injection. A total of 1904 radial spokes were acquired continuously in 318 to 340 seconds. High-temporal resolution data sets were formed by grouping 13 spokes per frame for temporal resolution of 2.2 to 2.4 seconds, which were reconstructed using the golden-angle radial sparse parallel technique that combines compressed sensing and parallel imaging. High-temporal resolution reconstructions were evaluated by a board-certified radiologist to generate gadolinium concentration-time curves in the aorta (arterial input function), portal vein (venous input function), and liver, which were fitted to dual-input dual-compartment model to estimate liver perfusion metrics that were compared between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers.
RESULTS: The cirrhotic livers had significantly lower total plasma flow (70.1 ± 10.1 versus 103.1 ± 24.3 mL/min per 100 mL; P < 0.05), lower portal venous flow (33.4 ± 17.7 versus 89.9 ± 20.8 mL/min per 100 mL; P < 0.05), and higher arterial perfusion fraction (52.0% ± 23.4% versus 12.4% ± 7.1%; P < 0.05). The mean transit time was higher in the cirrhotic livers (24.4 ± 4.7 versus 15.7 ± 3.4 seconds; P < 0.05), and the hepatocellular uptake rate was lower (3.03 ± 2.1 versus 6.53 ± 2.4 100/min; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Liver perfusion metrics can be estimated from free-breathing dynamic acquisition performed for every clinical examination without additional contrast injection or time. This is a novel paradigm for dynamic liver imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25333309      PMCID: PMC4286452          DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  41 in total

1.  Combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging for highly accelerated first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Ricardo Otazo; Daniel Kim; Leon Axel; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Fast 3D contrast enhanced MRI of the liver using temporal resolution acceleration with constrained evolution reconstruction.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Pascal Spincemaille; Gang Chen; Mukta Agrawal; Thanh D Nguyen; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Improved hepatic arterial phase MRI with 3-second temporal resolution.

Authors:  Mukta D Agrawal; Pascal Spincemaille; Kevin W Mennitt; Bo Xu; Yi Wang; Silvina P Dutruel; Martin R Prince
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Combined quantification of liver perfusion and function with dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Steven Sourbron; Wieland H Sommer; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph J Zech
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis patients.

Authors:  Bang-Bin Chen; Chao-Yu Hsu; Chih-Wei Yu; Shwu-Yuan Wei; Jia-Horng Kao; Hsuan-Shu Lee; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Prediction of liver function by using magnetic resonance-based portal venous perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Hesheng Wang; Timothy D Johnson; Charlie Pan; Hero Hussain; James M Balter; Daniel Normolle; Edgar Ben-Josef; Randall K Ten Haken; Theodore S Lawrence; Mary Feng
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Quantitative evaluation of liver function with MRI Using Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  Hun-Kyu Ryeom; Seong-Hun Kim; Jong-Yeol Kim; Hye-Jeong Kim; Jong-Min Lee; Yong-Min Chang; Yong-Sun Kim; Duk-Sik Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement?

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Licht Tominaga; Takatoshi Kitamura; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Benjamin L Viglianti; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Elaine M Caoili; Ravi K Kaza; Peter S C Liu; Katherine E Maturen; Thomas L Chenevert; Hero K Hussain
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Li Feng; Tobias K Block; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ruth P Lim; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Compressed sensing for body MRI.

Authors:  Li Feng; Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Hersh Chandarana
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.

Authors:  Lihua Chen; Daihong Liu; Jiuquan Zhang; Bing Xie; Xiaoyue Zhou; Robert Grimm; Xuequan Huang; Jian Wang; Li Feng
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Quantification of liver function by linearization of a two-compartment model of gadoxetic acid uptake using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Josiah Simeth; Adam Johansson; Dawn Owen; Kyle Cuneo; Michelle Mierzwa; Mary Feng; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  Yousef Mazaheri; Nathanael Kim; Yulia Lakhman; Ramin Jafari; Alberto Vargas; Ricardo Otazo
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Detection of prostate cancer local recurrence following radical prostatectomy: assessment using a continuously acquired radial golden-angle compressed sensing acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Anunita Khasgiwala; Ankur M Doshi; Justin M Ream; Samir S Taneja; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-01

6.  Performance of simultaneous high temporal resolution quantitative perfusion imaging of bladder tumors and conventional multi-phase urography using a novel free-breathing continuously acquired radial compressed-sensing MRI sequence.

Authors:  Nainesh Parikh; Justin M Ream; Hoi Cheung Zhang; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Function Using Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Monitoring Transporter-Mediated Processes in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Leonidas Georgiou; Jeffrey Penny; Glynis Nicholls; Neil Woodhouse; François-Xavier Blé; Penny L Hubbard Cristinacce; Josephine H Naish
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Quantitative perfusion imaging of neoplastic liver lesions: A multi-institution study.

Authors:  Shivani Pahwa; Hao Liu; Yong Chen; Sara Dastmalchian; Gregory O'Connor; Ziang Lu; Chaitra Badve; Alice Yu; Katherine Wright; Hamid Chalian; Shengxiang Rao; Caixia Fu; Ignacio Vallines; Mark Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich; Mengsu Zeng; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A pharmacokinetic model including arrival time for two inputs and compensating for varying applied flip-angle in dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Tian Zhang; Jurgen H Runge; Cristina Lavini; Jaap Stoker; Thomas van Gulik; Kasia P Cieslak; Lucas J van Vliet; Frans M Vos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.