Literature DB >> 23192781

Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality.

Matthew S Davenport1, Benjamin L Viglianti, Mahmoud M Al-Hawary, Elaine M Caoili, Ravi K Kaza, Peter S C Liu, Katherine E Maturen, Thomas L Chenevert, Hero K Hussain.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether acute transient dyspnea and/or arterial phase image degradation occurs more or less often after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium than with intravenous administration of gadobenate dimeglumine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained for this prospective observational study. One hundred ninety-eight gadolinium-based contrast media administrations (99 with gadoxetate disodium [10 mL, n = 97; 8 mL, n = 1; 16 mL, n = 1] and 99 with gadobenate dimeglumine [0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight, maximum dose, 20 mL]) for hepatobiliary indications were assessed in 192 patients. Subjective patient complaints were assessed. Objective respiratory motion degradation on T1-weighted precontrast and dynamic postcontrast (arterial, venous, or late dynamic or extracellular) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets were independently assessed in a randomized, blinded fashion by five readers using a five-point scale, with mean scores of 4 or greater indicating severe motion. Comparisons between agents were made by using χ(2) or Fisher exact test, where appropriate.
RESULTS: Significantly more patient complaints of acute transient dyspnea occurred after gadoxetate disodium administration than gadobenate dimeglumine (14% [14 of 99] vs 5% [five of 99], P = .05). There were significantly more severely degraded arterial phase data sets for gadoxetate disodium than for gadobenate dimeglumine for both the general population (17% [17 of 99] vs 2% [two of 99], P = .0007) and the subpopulation with cirrhosis (19% [14 of 72] vs 3% [one of 37], P = .02). This effect did not extend to venous (1% [one of 99] vs 2% [two of 99], P > .99 [overall population]) or late dynamic or extracellular (2% [two of 99] vs 0% [zero of 99], P = .5 [overall population]) phases. No patient required treatment for self-limited dyspnea.
CONCLUSION: Intravenous gadoxetate disodium can result in acute self-limiting dyspnea that can have a deleterious effect on arterial phase MR image quality and occurs significantly more often than with intravenous gadobenate dimeglumine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23192781     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  76 in total

1.  Advantages of radial volumetric breath-hold examination (VIBE) with k-space weighted image contrast reconstruction (KWIC) over Cartesian VIBE in liver imaging of volunteers simulating inadequate or no breath-holding ability.

Authors:  Yasunari Fujinaga; Yoshihiro Kitou; Ayumi Ohya; Yasuo Adachi; Naomichi Tamaru; Aya Shiobara; Hitoshi Ueda; Marcel D Nickel; Katsuya Maruyama; Masumi Kadoya
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Jeong-Min Lee; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Respiratory motion artefacts in dynamic liver MRI: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Julian A Luetkens; Patrick A Kupczyk; Jonas Doerner; Rolf Fimmers; Winfried A Willinek; Hans H Schild; Guido M Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents.

Authors:  Anum Aslam; Amita Kamath; Bradley Spieler; Mark Maschiocchi; Carl F Sabottke; Victoria Chernyak; Sara C Lewis
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-15

5.  Modified CAIPIRINHA-VIBE without view-sharing on gadoxetic acid-enhanced multi-arterial phase MR imaging for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE.

Authors:  Seung Baek Hong; Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Hyeong Il Seo; Hyun Sung Kim; Dong Uk Kim; Tae Un Kim; Hwa Seong Ryu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Insight into hepatocellular carcinoma biology with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Alexander Kagen; Kathryn Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20

7.  Evaluation of Transient Motion During Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Multiphasic Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Free-Breathing Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Mi Hye Yu; Bo Yun Hur; Robert Grimm; Kai Tobias Block; Hersh Chandarana; Berthold Kiefer; Yohan Son
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Functional MR Imaging Techniques in Oncology in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Reduction in respiratory motion artefacts on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI after training technicians to apply a simple and more patient-adapted breathing command.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Simon Matoori; Johannes M Froehlich; Constantin von Weymarn; Carolin Reischauer; Orpheus Kolokythas; Matthias Goyen; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Rosemarie Forstner; Jan D Soyka; Aleksis Doert; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma conspicuity on hepatobiliary phase images with gadoxetate disodium vs. delayed phase images with extracellular cellular contrast agent.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; En-Haw Wu; Seong Ho Park; Z Jane Wang; Thomas A Hope; Judy Yee; Li-Qin Zhao; Wei-Chou Chang; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.