BACKGROUND: Examining responders and non-responders to behavioral lifestyle interventions among overweight/obese adults with additional comorbidities may aid in refining and tailoring obesity treatment. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the use of latent class analysis to identify patterns of response to behavioral lifestyle interventions based on adherence to diet and exercise recommendations. METHOD: Repeated measures latent class analysis was applied to two clinical trial datasets, combination of two active interventions in the PREMIER Trial (n = 501) and phase 1 of the Weight Loss Maintenance Trial (WLM; n = 1685), to identify patterns of response to behavioral lifestyle interventions. Treatment response was based on adherence to daily recommendations for fruit/vegetable, fat, saturated fat, sodium, and exercise at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: In PREMIER, three distinct latent classes emerged: responders (45.9%), non-responders (23.6%), and early adherers (30.5%). Responders and Early Adherers had greater weight loss at 6 and 18 months and were more likely to meet behavioral recommendations at 18 months than Non-responders. For WLM, there were four latent classes: partial responders (16%), non-responders (40%), early adherers (2%), and fruit/veggie only responders (41%). Non-responders in WLM had significantly less weight loss at 6 months compared to that of the other three latent classes. CONCLUSION: Latent class analysis is a useful method to apply to clinical trial data to identify distinct patterns of response to behavioral interventions. Overweight/ obese participants who respond to behavioral lifestyle treatment (i.e., meet behavioral recommendations) have significantly greater weight loss than that of participants who do not make behavioral changes.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Examining responders and non-responders to behavioral lifestyle interventions among overweight/obese adults with additional comorbidities may aid in refining and tailoring obesity treatment. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the use of latent class analysis to identify patterns of response to behavioral lifestyle interventions based on adherence to diet and exercise recommendations. METHOD: Repeated measures latent class analysis was applied to two clinical trial datasets, combination of two active interventions in the PREMIER Trial (n = 501) and phase 1 of the Weight Loss Maintenance Trial (WLM; n = 1685), to identify patterns of response to behavioral lifestyle interventions. Treatment response was based on adherence to daily recommendations for fruit/vegetable, fat, saturated fat, sodium, and exercise at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: In PREMIER, three distinct latent classes emerged: responders (45.9%), non-responders (23.6%), and early adherers (30.5%). Responders and Early Adherers had greater weight loss at 6 and 18 months and were more likely to meet behavioral recommendations at 18 months than Non-responders. For WLM, there were four latent classes: partial responders (16%), non-responders (40%), early adherers (2%), and fruit/veggie only responders (41%). Non-responders in WLM had significantly less weight loss at 6 months compared to that of the other three latent classes. CONCLUSION: Latent class analysis is a useful method to apply to clinical trial data to identify distinct patterns of response to behavioral interventions. Overweight/ obeseparticipants who respond to behavioral lifestyle treatment (i.e., meet behavioral recommendations) have significantly greater weight loss than that of participants who do not make behavioral changes.
Authors: J F Sallis; W L Haskell; P D Wood; S P Fortmann; T Rogers; S N Blair; R S Paffenbarger Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Catherine M Champagne; David W Harsha; Lawton S Cooper; Eva Obarzanek; Patricia J Elmer; Victor J Stevens; William M Vollmer; Pao-Hwa Lin; Laura P Svetkey; Sarah W Stedman; Deborah R Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rebecca H Neiberg; Rena R Wing; George A Bray; David M Reboussin; Amy D Rickman; Karen C Johnson; Abbas E Kitabchi; Lucy F Faulconbridge; Dalane W Kitzman; Mark A Espeland Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: P J Teixeira; S B Going; L B Houtkooper; E C Cussler; L L Metcalfe; R M Blew; L B Sardinha; T G Lohman Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2004-09
Authors: Laura P Svetkey; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jack F Hollis; Catherine M Loria; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Kristine Funk; Patti Smith; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Valerie Myers; Lillian F Lien; Daniel Laferriere; Betty Kennedy; Gerald J Jerome; Fran Heinith; David W Harsha; Pamela Evans; Thomas P Erlinger; Arline T Dalcin; Janelle Coughlin; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Champagne; Alan Bauck; Jamy D Ard; Kathleen Aicher Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jack F Hollis; Christina M Gullion; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jamy D Ard; Catherine M Champagne; Arlene Dalcin; Thomas P Erlinger; Kristine Funk; Daniel Laferriere; Pao-Hwa Lin; Catherine M Loria; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; William M Vollmer; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sarah J Schrauben; Jesse Y Hsu; Sylvia E Rosas; Bernard G Jaar; Xiaoming Zhang; Rajat Deo; Georges Saab; Jing Chen; Swati Lederer; Radhika Kanthety; L Lee Hamm; Ana C Ricardo; James P Lash; Harold I Feldman; Amanda H Anderson Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Melissa L Stansbury; Jean R Harvey; Rebecca A Krukowski; Christine A Pellegrini; Xuewen Wang; Delia S West Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Michael C Robertson; Margaret Raber; Yue Liao; Ivan Wu; Nathan Parker; Leticia Gatus; Thuan Le; Casey P Durand; Karen M Basen-Engquist Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-08-13 Impact factor: 3.046