BACKGROUND: To improve methods for long-term weight management, the Weight Loss Maintenance (WLM) trial, a four-center randomized trial, was conducted to compare alternative strategies for maintaining weight loss over a 30-month period. This paper describes methods and results for the initial 6-month weight-loss program (Phase I). METHODS:Eligible adults were aged > or =25, overweight or obese (BMI=25-45 kg/m2), and on medications for hypertension and/or dyslipidemia. Anthropomorphic, demographic, and psychosocial measures were collected at baseline and 6 months. Participants (n=1685) attended 20 weekly group sessions to encourage calorie restriction, moderate-intensity physical activity, and the DASH (dietary approaches to stop hypertension) dietary pattern. Weight-loss predictors with missing data were replaced by multiple imputation. RESULTS:Participants were 44% African American and 67% women; 79% were obese (BMI> or =30), 87% were taking anti-hypertensive medications, and 38% were taking antidyslipidemia medications. Participants attended an average of 72% of 20 group sessions. They self-reported 117 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week, kept 3.7 daily food records per week, and consumed 2.9 servings of fruits and vegetables per day. The Phase-I follow-up rate was 92%. Mean (SD) weight change was -5.8 kg (4.4), and 69% lost at least 4 kg. All race-gender subgroups lost substantial weight: African-American men (-5.4 kg +/- 7.7); African-American women (-4.1 kg +/- 2.9); non-African-American men (-8.5 kg +/- 12.9); and non-African-American women (-5.8 kg +/- 6.1). Behavioral measures (e.g., diet records and physical activity) accounted for most of the weight-loss variation, although the association between behavioral measures and weight loss differed by race and gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: The WLM behavioral intervention successfully achieved clinically significant short-term weight loss in a diverse population of high-risk patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To improve methods for long-term weight management, the Weight Loss Maintenance (WLM) trial, a four-center randomized trial, was conducted to compare alternative strategies for maintaining weight loss over a 30-month period. This paper describes methods and results for the initial 6-month weight-loss program (Phase I). METHODS: Eligible adults were aged > or =25, overweight or obese (BMI=25-45 kg/m2), and on medications for hypertension and/or dyslipidemia. Anthropomorphic, demographic, and psychosocial measures were collected at baseline and 6 months. Participants (n=1685) attended 20 weekly group sessions to encourage calorie restriction, moderate-intensity physical activity, and the DASH (dietary approaches to stop hypertension) dietary pattern. Weight-loss predictors with missing data were replaced by multiple imputation. RESULTS:Participants were 44% African American and 67% women; 79% were obese (BMI> or =30), 87% were taking anti-hypertensive medications, and 38% were taking antidyslipidemia medications. Participants attended an average of 72% of 20 group sessions. They self-reported 117 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity per week, kept 3.7 daily food records per week, and consumed 2.9 servings of fruits and vegetables per day. The Phase-I follow-up rate was 92%. Mean (SD) weight change was -5.8 kg (4.4), and 69% lost at least 4 kg. All race-gender subgroups lost substantial weight: African-American men (-5.4 kg +/- 7.7); African-American women (-4.1 kg +/- 2.9); non-African-American men (-8.5 kg +/- 12.9); and non-African-American women (-5.8 kg +/- 6.1). Behavioral measures (e.g., diet records and physical activity) accounted for most of the weight-loss variation, although the association between behavioral measures and weight loss differed by race and gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: The WLM behavioral intervention successfully achieved clinically significant short-term weight loss in a diverse population of high-risk patients.
Authors: R W Jeffery; A Drewnowski; L H Epstein; A J Stunkard; G T Wilson; R R Wing; D R Hill Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: V J Stevens; E Obarzanek; N R Cook; I M Lee; L J Appel; D Smith West; N C Milas; M Mattfeldt-Beman; L Belden; C Bragg; M Millstone; J Raczynski; A Brewer; B Singh; J Cohen Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-01-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: J Tuomilehto; J Lindström; J G Eriksson; T T Valle; H Hämäläinen; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Laakso; A Louheranta; M Rastas; V Salminen; M Uusitupa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N V Dhurandhar; D Schoeller; A W Brown; S B Heymsfield; D Thomas; T I A Sørensen; J R Speakman; M Jeansonne; D B Allison Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: M L Fitzgibbon; L M Tussing-Humphreys; J S Porter; I K Martin; A Odoms-Young; L K Sharp Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Leonor Corsino; María Pilar Rocha-Goldberg; Bryan C Batch; David I Ortiz-Melo; Hayden B Bosworth; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Rachel W Goode; Melissa A Kalarchian; Linda Craighead; Molly B Conroy; John Wallace; Shaun M Eack; Lora E Burke Journal: Eat Behav Date: 2018-03-09