Literature DB >> 25331229

Surgical results of idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane.

Kyung Tae Kang1, Kwang Soo Kim, Yu Cheol Kim.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare the surgical results of patients with an idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM) after pars plana vitrectomy and membranectomy. The medical records of 51 consecutive patients with ERM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and membranectomy with a follow-up >1 year were reviewed retrospectively. Age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), lens status, presence of additional removal of internal limiting membrane (ILM), and recurrence rate within 1 year after the operation were compared in the idiopathic and secondary ERM groups. Forty-one eyes had idiopathic ERM and 10 eyes had secondary ERM. Preoperative average BCVA values in the two groups were 0.47 and 0.70, respectively, and the postoperative average BCVA values were 0.28 and 0.18, respectively, with significant improvement postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). The recurrence rate within 1 year after surgery in the idiopathic group was 4.88 % and that in the secondary group was 20 % (p = 0.03). The recurrence rate was 4.3 % in the idiopathic group with ILM removal and it was 5.9 % without ILM removal (p = 0.03). No case recurred within 1 year in the secondary group with ILM removal but the recurrence rate was 33.3 % in the group without ILM removal (p = 0.01). Although patients with secondary ERM gained better visual acuity improvement postoperatively, the recurrence rate was higher within 1 year than that of patients with idiopathic ERM. Removal of the ILM may lower recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25331229     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-0010-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  17 in total

1.  Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Use after treatment of retinal tears or retinal detachment.

Authors:  S de Bustros; T A Rice; R G Michels; J T Thompson; S Marcus; B M Glaser
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-06

2.  Surgery for epimacular membrane: impact of retinal internal limiting membrane removal on functional outcome.

Authors:  Etienne H Bovey; Sylvie Uffer; Farid Achache
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Alvin Kh Kwok; Timothy Yy Lai; Kenneth Sc Yuen
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Complications of surgery for epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  G Donati; A D Kapetanios; C J Pournaras
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases.

Authors:  Otman Sandali; Mohamed El Sanharawi; Nicolas Lecuen; Pierre-Olivier Barale; Sebastien Bonnel; Elena Basli; Vincent Borderie; Laurent Laroche; Claire Monin
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Recurrent macular pucker.

Authors:  C P Wilkinson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Comprehensive analysis of inflammatory immune mediators in vitreoretinal diseases.

Authors:  Takeru Yoshimura; Koh-hei Sonoda; Mika Sugahara; Yasutaka Mochizuki; Hiroshi Enaida; Yuji Oshima; Akifumi Ueno; Yasuaki Hata; Hiroki Yoshida; Tatsuro Ishibashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane removal in epiretinal membrane surgery: a clinical and histologic study.

Authors:  Alvin K H Kwok; Timothy Y Y Lai; Winnie W Y Li; Donald C F Woo; Nongnart R Chan
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study.

Authors:  Donald W Park; Pravin U Dugel; Jennifer Garda; Jack O Sipperley; Allen Thach; Scott R Sneed; Jennifer Blaisdell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia. Prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement.

Authors:  S R Pesin; R J Olk; M G Grand; I Boniuk; N P Arribas; M A Thomas; D F Williams; D Burgess
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  10 in total

1.  Motorized Micro-Forceps with Active Motion Guidance based on Common-Path SSOCT for Epiretinal Membranectomy.

Authors:  Gyeong Woo Cheon; Berk Gonenc; Russell H Taylor; Peter L Gehlbach; Jin U Kang
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 5.303

2.  Comparison of photoreceptor outer segment length in diabetic and idiopathic epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  K Yüksel; Y Karaküçük; A Özkaya; G Pekel; Ö Baz; C Alagöz; A T Yazıcı
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Comparison of surgical outcomes after removal of epiretinal membrane associated with retinal break and idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Dong Ik Kim; Bo Hee Kim; Ki Woong Bae; Un Chul Park
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Visual outcomes of primary versus secondary epiretinal membrane following vitrectomy and cataract surgery.

Authors:  J Corbin Norton; Mohamed K Soliman; Yit C Yang; Shree Kurup; Ahmed B Sallam
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Recurrence rate and need for reoperation after surgery with or without internal limiting membrane removal for the treatment of the epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Fernando José De Novelli; Mauro Goldbaum; Mario Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro; Fabio Bom Aggio; Mario Junqueira Nóbrega; Walter Yukihiko Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2017-12-11

6.  Postoperative changes in the retinal thickness and volume after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Jae Yon Won; Mirinae Kim; Young-Hoon Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  The effect of multiple vitrectomies and its indications on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Hrvoje Kovacic; Roger C W Wolfs; Emine Kılıç; Wishal D Ramdas
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  With or without internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qinying Huang; Jinying Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Epiretinal membrane: optical coherence tomography-based diagnosis and classification.

Authors:  William Stevenson; Claudia M Prospero Ponce; Daniel R Agarwal; Rachel Gelman; John B Christoforidis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-29

10.  Does internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery induce microscotomas on microperimetry? Study protocol for PEELING, a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Ducloyer; Juliette Ivan; Alexandra Poinas; Olivier Lebreton; Alexandre Bonissent; Paul Fossum; Christelle Volteau; Ramin Tadayoni; Catherine Creuzot-Garchet; Yannick Le Mer; Julien Perol; June Fortin; Anne Chiffoleau; Fanny Billaud; Catherine Ivan; Michel Weber
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.